Heterozygous loss‐of‐function variants in the PKD1 gene are commonly associated with adult‐onset autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), where the formation of renal cysts depends on the dosage of the PKD1 gene. Biallelic null PKD1 variants are not viable, but biallelic hypomorphic variants could lead to early‐onset PKD. We report a non‐consanguineous Chinese family with recurrent fetal polycystic kidney and negative findings in the coding region of the PKHD1 gene or chromosomal microarray analysis. Trio exome analysis revealed compound heterozygous variants of uncertain significance in the PKD1 gene in the index pregnancy: a novel paternally inherited c.7863 + 5G > C and a maternally inherited c.9739C > T, p.(Arg3247Cys). Segregation analysis through long‐range PCR followed by nested PCR and Sanger sequencing confirmed another affected fetus had both variants, while the other two normal siblings and the parents carried either variant. Thus, these two variants, both of which were hypomorphic as opposed to null variants, co‐segregated with prenatal onset polycystic kidney disease in this family. Functional studies are needed to further determine the impact of these two variants. Our findings highlight the biallelic inheritance of hypomorphic PKD1 variants causing prenatal onset polycystic kidney disease, which provides a better understanding of phenotype‐genotype correlation and valuable information for reproductive counseling.

Introduction: This study aimed to report the screening performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing for chromosomal abnormalities in twins, triplets, and vanishing twin pregnancies.Material and Methods: Data were obtained from pregnant women with a multiple pregnancy or a vanishing twin pregnancy at ≥10 weeks’ gestation who requested self‐financed cfDNA testing between May 2015 and December 2021. Those that had positive screening results had diagnostic confirmatory procedures after counseling and consent. The performance of screening of the cfDNA test was determined by calculating confirmation rate and combined false‐positive rate (cFPR).Results: Data from 292 women were included after exclusion of those lost to follow‐up, with no‐result on cfDNA testing, or had reductions. Of the 292 pregnancies, 10 (3.4%) were triplets, including no cases of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18; 249 (85.3%) were twins, including 3 cases of trisomy 21 and no cases of trisomy 18 and 13; and 33 (11.3%) were vanishing twins, including 3 cases of trisomy 21 and 1 case of trisomy 18. The median (IQR) maternal age was 34 years (31–37). For triplet pregnancies, the initial no‐result rate was 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–26.4), all with results after redraw. For twin pregnancies, the initial no‐result rate was 12.9% (95% CI 9.6–17.0), and the no‐result rate after redraw was 1.6% (95% CI 0.7–3.6). For vanishing twins, there were no cases with no‐result. All triplets had low‐risk cfDNA results. The confirmation rate for trisomy 21 was 100% with a FPR at 0% due to the small number of positive cases for twins. For vanishing twins, one high‐risk case for trisomy 21 and the only high‐risk case for trisomy 18 were confirmed with a cFPR of 8.3% (n = 2/24; 95% CI 2.3–25.9).Conclusions: cfDNA testing in twin pregnancies has sufficient screening performance for trisomy 21 but the number of affected cases for other conditions is limited to draw any meaningful conclusion. The use of cfDNA testing in triplet pregnancies and vanishing twins remains an area for further research.

Introduction: Primary microcephaly (MCPH) is not an uncommon disorder with multiple etiologies. There are a growing number of MCPH-related genes discovered due to the extensive application of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in clinical and research settings. Biallelic mutations in the SASS6 gene cause an extremely rare MCPH, type 14. To date, only two families with SASS6 gene-related microcephaly have been reported. Case Description: We report a case of recurrent congenital microcephaly in a Chinese family. The two affected fetuses presented with microcephaly early in the second trimester with agenesis of the corpus callosum. In the first affected fetus, trio WES detected two compound heterozygous candidate variants c.1139T>C(p.L380P) and c.1223C>G (p.T408S) in the SASS6 gene. Another affected fetus also inherited both variants, while the normal child carried neither variant through Sanger sequencing analysis. Both variants were classified as a variant of uncertain significance according to the current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Conclusion: We reported novel biallelic variants in the SASS6 gene, encoding the SAS6 centriolar assembly protein, associated with prenatal onset of autosomal recessive microcephaly. We postulate that the pathomechanism of the compound heterozygous variants in close proximity could potentiate the overall coiled instability leading to the phenotypic features of our case.

This study aimed to compare the screening performance of genome-wide cfDNA testing for chromosomal abnormalities between two periods where additional findings were reported and not reported. Data were obtained from consecutive pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥10 weeks who requested cfDNA testing during 2015–2019. The performance of screening of the cfDNA test was determined by calculating the concordance rate, detection rate, and false-positive rate. Data from 3981 women were included. The no-result rates were similar between the two reporting periods (2.04% vs. 2.08%). Concordance rates for trisomy 21 and 18 were 100% and 100%, respectively. There were two cases tested high risk for trisomy 13, with a concordance rate of 0%. In total, 12 cases were high risk for any sex chromosome aneuploidy with an overall concordance of 75%, and 15 cases tested high risk for any rare autosomal trisomy, with a 13.3% concordance rate. The detection rates for trisomy 21 and 18 were 100% and 100%, respectively. For any SCA, the detection rate was 90%. For the two reporting periods, the combined false-positive rates were 0.93% and 0.17%, which were significantly different (p = 0.002). Restricting the reporting of additional findings from genome-wide cfDNA analysis has reduced the false-positive rate but without a reduction in the no-result rate.