Winnie KW So

Winnie KW So

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2009 in Oncology Nursing Forum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WSWinnie KW So
Winnie KW So
GMGene Marsh
Gene Marsh
WLW. M. Ling
W. M. Ling
FLF. Y. Leung
F. Y. Leung
JLJoe C. K. Lo
Joe C. K. Lo
GLGeorge K. H. Li
George K. H. Li
To examine the symptom cluster of fatigue, pain, anxiety, and depression and its effect on the quality of life (QOL) of women receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy for breast cancer. Descriptive. Oncology outpatient sections of four public hospitals in Hong Kong. 215 ethnic Chinese women who were midway through treatment for breast cancer. Chinese versions of the Brief Fatigue Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Brief Pain Inventory, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Breast Cancer, and Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey were used. Spearman rho correlation and structural equation modeling were used to examine the relationships among the study variables. Breast cancer, fatigue, pain, anxiety, depression, and QOL. Most participants reported mild-to-moderate levels of fatigue and pain. Twenty-one percent and 36% of patients might have had an anxiety or depression disorder, respectively. Significant correlations among the four symptoms supported the existence of the symptom cluster. The participants receiving chemotherapy had inadequate social support, experienced higher levels of symptoms, and were more likely to have a poorer QOL. The findings supported the existence of the symptom cluster that had detrimental effects on QOL. This study shed light on a contemporary approach of grouping several related symptoms together. The findings enhance nurses' clinical sensitivity when identifying patients in high-risk groups and provide useful information for designing and prioritizing symptom-management strategies to meet patients' needs.

21 March 2021 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WSWinnie KW So
Winnie KW So
BLBernard M.H. Law
Bernard M.H. Law
MNMarques Shek Nam Ng
Marques Shek Nam Ng
XHXiaole He
Xiaole He
DCDorothy N. S. Chan
Dorothy N. S. Chan
AMAlexandra L. McCarthy
Alexandra L. McCarthy
Breast cancer patients often experience symptoms that adversely affect their quality of life. It is understood that many of these symptoms tend to cluster together: while they might have different manifestations and occur during different phases of the disease trajectory, the symptoms often have a common aetiology that is a potential target for intervention. Understanding the symptom clusters associated with breast cancer might usefully inform the development of effective care plans for affected patients. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the known symptom clusters among breast cancer patients during and/or after cancer treatment. A search was conducted using five databases for studies reporting symptom clusters among breast cancer patients. The search yielded 32 studies for inclusion. The findings suggest that fatigue‐sleep disturbance and psychological symptom cluster (including anxiety, depression, nervousness, irritability, sadness, worry) are the most commonly‐reported symptom clusters among breast cancer patients. Further, the composition of symptom clusters tends to change across various stages of cancer treatment. While this review identified some commonalities, the different methodologies used to identify symptom clusters resulted in inconsistencies in symptom cluster identification. It would be useful if future studies could separately examine the symptom clusters that occur in breast cancer patients undergoing a particular treatment type, and use standardised instruments across studies to assess symptoms. The review concludes that further studies could usefully determine the biological pathways associated with various symptom clusters, which would inform the development of effective and efficient symptom management strategies.

1 September 2009 in Journal of Professional Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCChristine K.L. Chan
Christine K.L. Chan
WSWinnie KW So
Winnie KW So
Daniel FongDaniel Fong
Daniel Fong

1 February 2010 in European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WSWinnie KW So
Winnie KW So
GMGene Marsh
Gene Marsh
WLW.M. Ling
W.M. Ling
FLF.Y. Leung
F.Y. Leung
JLJoe C.K. Lo
Joe C.K. Lo
GLGeorge K.H. Li
George K.H. Li

1 October 2012 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WSWinnie KW So
Winnie KW So
RCRaymond J. Chan
Raymond J. Chan
DCDorothy N.S. CHAN
Dorothy N.S. CHAN
BHB.G.M. Hughes
B.G.M. Hughes
SCSek Ying Chair
Sek Ying Chair
CCCarmen W.H. Chan
Carmen W.H. Chan

14 July 2017 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlex Molassiotis
Alex Molassiotis
PYP. Yates
P. Yates
QLQ. Li
Q. Li
WSWinnie KW So
Winnie KW So
KPK. Pongthavornkamol
K. Pongthavornkamol
YXYinghua Xu
Yinghua Xu
To assess the supportive care needs, quality of life (QoL) and symptoms of patients with cancer after the end of first-line treatments and into survivorship in Asian countries using Australian data as benchmark. A cross-sectional survey was carried out in Australia and nine high-income (HICs) and low-/middle-income (LMICs) Asian countries (China, Japan, Hong Kong SAR, South Korea, Myanmar, Thailand, India, Singapore, Philippines) using validated scales (Cancer Survivors Unmet Needs scale), physical-symptom concerns (Cancer Survivors Survey of Needs subscale) and a single-item measure of global QoL perception. Data were collected from 1873 patients. QoL was highest in Australia; all other countries had significantly lower QoL than Australia (all P < 0.001). One-quarter of the patients reported low QoL (scores 1–3/10). The most frequently reported symptoms were fatigue (66.6%), loss of strength (61.8%), pain (61.6%), sleep disturbance (60.1%), and weight changes (57.7%), with no difference in symptom experience between Australian data and all other countries, or between HICs and LMICs. Unmet needs of moderate/strong level were high, particularly in the area of existential survivorship (psychosocial care) and receiving comprehensive cancer care. Australia and HICs had unmet needs (all low), but LMICs had a significantly higher number of needs both compared with Australia and HICs (all P < 0.001). Health care systems in Asian countries need to re-think and prioritize survivorship cancer care and put action plans in place to overcome some of the challenges surrounding the delivery of optimal supportive cancer care, use available resource-stratified guidelines for supportive care and test efficient and cost-effective models of survivorship care.