In clinical practice, patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangement–positive non–small-cell lung cancer commonly receive sequential treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The third-generation agent lorlatinib has been shown to inhibit a wide range of ALK resistance mutations and thus offers potential benefit in later lines, although real-world data are lacking. This multicenter study retrospectively investigated later-line, real-world use of lorlatinib in patients with advanced ALK- or ROS1-positive lung cancer. Fifty-one patients registered in a compassionate use program in Austria, who received second- or later-line lorlatinib between January 2016 and May 2020, were included in this retrospective real-world data analysis. Median follow-up was 25.3 months. Median time of lorlatinib treatment was 4.4 months for ALK-positive and 12.2 months for ROS-positive patients. ALK-positive patients showed a response rate of 43.2%, while 85.7% percent of the ROS1-positive patients were considered responders. Median overall survival from lorlatinib initiation was 10.2 and 20.0 months for the ALK- and ROS1-positive groups, respectively. In the ALK-positive group, lorlatinib proved efficacy after both brigatinib and alectinib. Lorlatinib treatment was well tolerated. Later-line lorlatinib treatment can induce sustained responses in patients with advanced ALK- and ROS1-positive lung cancer.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), less than 10% of patients survive the first five years when the disease has already spread at primary diagnosis. Methods: Blood samples were taken from 118 NSCLC patients at primary diagnosis or at progression of the disease before the start of a new treatment line and enriched for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by microfluidic Parsortix™ (Angle plc, Guildford GU2 7AF, UK) technology. The gene expression of epithelial cancer stem cell (CSC), epithelial to mesenchymal (EMT), and lung-related markers was assessed by qPCR, and the association of each marker with overall survival (OS) was evaluated using log-rank tests. Results: EpCAM was the most prevalent transcript, with 53.7% positive samples at primary diagnosis and 25.6% at recurrence. EpCAM and CK19, as well as NANOG, PROM1, TERT, CDH5, FAM83A, and PTHLH transcripts, were associated with worse OS. However, only the CSC-specific NANOG and PROM1 were related to the outcome both at primary diagnosis (NANOG: HR 3.21, 95%CI 1.02–10.14, p = 0.016; PROM1: HR 4.23, 95% CI 0.65–27.56, p = 0.007) and disease progression (NANOG: HR 4.17, 95%CI 0.72–24.14, p = 0.025; PROM1: HR 4.77, 95% CI 0.29–78.94, p = 0.032). Conclusions: The present study further underlines the relevance of the molecular characterization of CTCs. Our multi-marker analysis highlighted the prognostic value of cancer stem cell-related transcripts at primary diagnosis and disease progression.

EGFR exon 20 (EGFR Ex20) insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are insensitive to traditional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Mobocertinib is the only approved TKI specifically designed to target EGFR Ex20. We performed an international, real-world safety and efficacy analysis on patients with EGFR Ex20-positive NSCLC enrolled in a mobocertinib early access program. We explored the mechanisms of resistance by analyzing postprogression biopsies, as well as cross-resistance to amivantamab. Data from 86 patients with a median age of 67 years and a median of two prior lines of treatment were analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 95% of patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 38% of patients and included diarrhea (22%) and rash (8%). In 17% of patients, therapy was permanently discontinued, and two patients died due to TRAEs. Women were seven times more likely to discontinue treatment than men. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate to mobocertinib was 34% (95% CI, 24–45). The response rate in treatment-naïve patients was 27% (95% CI, 8–58). The median progression-free and overall survival was 5 months (95% CI, 3.5–6.5) and 12 months (95% CI, 6.8–17.2), respectively. The intracranial response rate was limited (13%), and one-third of disease progression cases involved the brain. Mobocertinib also showed antitumor activity following EGFR Ex20-specific therapy and vice versa. Potential mechanisms of resistance to mobocertinib included amplifications in MET, PIK3CA, and NRAS. Mobocertinib demonstrated meaningful efficacy in a real-world setting but was associated with considerable gastrointestinal and cutaneous toxicity.

About 15% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor the Kirsten rat sarcoma homolog G12C mutation (KRAS^G12C). Selective KRAS^G12C inhibitors offer new treatment opportunities, but little is known about the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of standard-of-care treatment (SOC) in this population. We retrospectively assessed the clinicopathological features of patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC and responses to SOC at two high-volume centers in Austria. Out of 2495 NSCLC patients tested, we identified 174 patients with advanced-stage disease carrying a KRAS^G12C mutation. Most patients were ≥65 years old (55%), heavy smokers (55%), and presented with comorbidities. The most frequent co-alteration was TP53 (18%). PD-L1 expression was high (TPS ≥ 50%) in 31%, very high (TPS ≥ 90%) in 11%, and negative in 31% of patients. A total of 138 patients (79%) received oncologic systemic treatment. The most common first-line therapy (1 L) was anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus platinum-based chemotherapy. Median overall survival measured from 1 L treatment was 15.3 months (95% CI, 8.6–21.9), 9.4 (95% CI, 5.3–13.5) from 2 L treatment, and 8.4 (95% CI, 1.7–15.1) from 3 L treatment. The time-to-next-treatment was 8.4 (95% CI, 5.2–11.6) from 1 L and 6.1 (95% CI, 2.7–9.7) months from 2 L to 3 L. These poor outcomes underscore the need for the implementation of new treatment options and for specific molecular testing.

Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare type of cancer with poor prognosis. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers could improve treatment strategies in these patients. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and breast cancer gene 1-associated protein (BAP-1) have been proposed to predict outcomes in PM, but existing data are limited and controversial. Design and Methods: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed data on expression patterns and the prognostic role of PD-L1, ILK and BAP-1 in consecutive patients diagnosed with PM. Results: Of all patients (n = 52) included, more than half showed a positive PD-L1 expression (52% TPS ≥ 1%, 65% CPS ≥ 1), 69% showed a BAP-1 loss and 80% an ILK ≥ 50%. Positive PD-L1 expression was more frequent in the non-epithelioid subtype (p = 0.045). ILK intensity (p = 0.032) and positive PD-L1 (p = 0.034) were associated with more advanced tumor stages. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 (95% CI 13.1–25.2) months. Multimodality therapy (MMT) including surgery and early stage were independent prognostic factors for longer OS (MMT: HR 0.347, 95% CI 0.13–0.90, p = 0.029; advanced stage: HR 4.989; 95% CI 1.64–15.13, p = 0.005). Patients with an expression of PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1% or BAP-1 positivity showed numerically worse survival with a median OS of 15.3 (11.5; 24.4) vs. 20.0 (11.2; 34.9) and 11.3 (5.6; 31.0) vs. 20.0 (15.2; 28.1) months, respectively. Furthermore, PD-L1 was associated with worse survival in patients receiving MMT (PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1%: 15.8 (12.1–25.4) vs. 31.3 (17.4–95.4) p = 0.053). ILK expression ≥50% did not influence survival. The combinations of CPS ≥ 1% with BAP-1 positivity or ILK expression ≥50% were associated with worse survival (p = 0.045, p = 0.019). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, expressions of PD-L1 and BAP-1 were associated with worse survival in patients with PM. ILK showed no prognostic value. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers facilitating optimized individual treatment decision in this rare type of cancer.

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in advanced stages, has poor prognosis. The main objective of the study is to evaluate real-world treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients harboring an EGFR mutation and being treated with TKIs. Methods: The EGFR mutation status was ascertained by next-generation sequencing. The observational cohort study used prospectively maintained registry data. Patient data were collected at two high-volume institutions in Austria between November 2020 and February 2025. The prevalence of EGFR mutations was 11% (145 out of 1267 patients). Results: Among 53 patients (stage IIIB or higher) with an EGFR mutation, median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 17.7 months (95% CI: 10.4–24.9) and 14.2 months (95% CI: 7.4–20.9), respectively. A total of 36 patients harbored common EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation) and exhibited a significantly better OS than those with an uncommon EGFR genotype (p < 0.005). Patients with exon 19 deletion (n = 25) showed the longest mOS, followed by those with L858R mutation (32.5 vs. 17 months). In multivariable analysis, the EGFR common mutation subtype (HR = 3.71 95%CI: 1.23–11.2) was associated with better OS. Patients with common EGFR genotypes, especially exon 19 deletion obtained longer OS and PFS compared with those with uncommon mutations in exon 18–21. Conclusions: The results underscore the prognostic role of distinct EGFR genotypes and the urgency of determining the mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer patients to ensure the best treatment decision. The study also highlights the challenges regarding to EGFR uncommon mutations and the resulting need for further research to investigate alternative treatment options.