Individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) commonly present with component risk factors for cardiometabolic risk and combined risk factors for cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS). These primary risk factors include obesity, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia/insulin resistance, and hypertension. Commonly referred to as “silent killers”, cardiometabolic risk and CMS increase the threat of cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of death after SCI. This narrative review will examine current data and the etiopathogenesis of cardiometabolic risk, CMS, and cardiovascular disease associated with SCI, focusing on pivotal research on cardiometabolic sequelae from the last five years. The review will also provide current diagnosis and surveillance criteria for cardiometabolic disorders after SCI, a novel obesity classification system based on percent total body fat, and lifestyle management strategies to improve cardiometabolic health.

Although early studies suggest the Acuity Circles (AC) allocation policy has increased access to deceased donor liver transplants (DDLTs) for patients with the highest MELD scores, changes in center- and region-level practices among patients with the highest MELD scores in response to AC are not well-characterized. OPTN/UNOS data were analyzed to compare center-level changes in the number of DDLTs based on allocation-MELD (aMELD) categories used for AC sharing performed in the 18-month periods before and after AC enactment on February 4, 2020. There was large center-level variation in the number and proportion of aMELD ≥ 37 DDLTs performed from pre-AC to AC period; 13 centers accounted for 196 of the 198 total net increase in aMELD ≥ 37 DDLTs performed after AC, 5 of these being from UNOS region 5. Similar center-level variation was seen for MELD 33-36 and MELD 29-32 DDLTs, with 17 centers and 14 centers, respectively, accounting for the entire net increase in DDLTs in the aMELD categories. In conclusion, AC increased access to livers for transplantation for high MELD patients nationally, but imbalances remain in transplant practice patterns at the center and regional levels. Longer-term study is necessary to assess effectiveness of AC in improving equitability of liver transplantations.

Introduction: Clostridioides difficile is the primary cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. The most common laboratory testing methods for C. difficile infection (CDI) are toxin detection via enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which detect a toxogenic strain. This study examines the impact of Rhode Island’s largest hospital system changing from PCR-only to two-step CDI testing. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 2,173 adult inpatients was conducted. Patients were grouped into two cohorts: those tested for toxigenic C. difficile via PCR-only (June 2019–May 2021, n = 1,194) and those tested with the two-step algorithm (June 2021–May 2023, n = 979). Cluster analysis identified patient risk groups for hypothesis generation, and complications such as death, colectomy, intensive care unit ICU transfer, and 30-day readmission were compared across these groups. Results: In the moderate-risk group, there was a significant reduction in ICU transfers and readmission rates with the two-step testing by 5% and 7%, respectively. There were no other significant differences in complications between testing groups. Anti-CDI antibiotics were discontinued in 15% ( n = 106) of EIA-negative patients in the two-step testing group. Moderate-risk patients were less likely to have treatment discontinued than severe-risk patients (OR = 2.00, p = 0.016). Discussion: The two-step testing algorithm did not negatively affect patient outcomes and led to a modest decrease in anti-CDI treatment, supporting the safety of two-step CDI testing in hospitalized patients.