Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is well-established as a first line therapy instead of corticosteroid (CS) therapy to treat active Crohn's disease (CD) in children. It also has been shown to have benefits over and above induction of disease remission in paediatric populations. However, other than in Japanese populations, this intervention is not routinely utilised in adults. To investigate potential reasons for variation in response between adult studies of EEN and CS therapy. The Ovid database was searched over a 6-mo period. Articles directly comparing EEN and CS therapy in adults were included. Eleven articles were identified. EEN therapy remission rates varied considerably. Poor compliance with EEN therapy due to unpalatable formula was an issue in half of the studies. Remission rates of studies that only included patients with previously untreated/new CD were higher than studies including patients with both existing and new disease. There was limited evidence to determine if disease location, duration of disease or age of diagnosis affected EEN therapy outcomes. There is some evidence to support the use of EEN as a treatment option for a select group of adults, namely those motivated to adhere to an EEN regimen and possibly those newly diagnosed with CD. In addition, the use of more palatable formulas could improve treatment compliance.

Background and Aims: The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is rising worldwide and no cure is available. Many patients require surgery and they often present with nutritional deficiencies. Although randomised controlled trials of dietary therapy are lacking, expert IBD centres have long-established interdisciplinary care, including tailored nutritional therapy, to optimise clinical outcomes and resource utilisation. This topical review aims to share expertise and offers current practice recommendations to optimise outcomes of IBD patients who undergo surgery.Methods: A consensus expert panel consisting of dietitians, surgeons, and gastroenterologists, convened by the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation, performed a systematic literature review. Nutritional evaluation and dietary needs, perioperative optimis ation, surgical complications, long-term needs, and special situations were critically appraised. Statements were developed using a Delphi methodology incorporating three successive rounds. Current practice positions were set when ≥80% of participants agreed on a recommendation.Results: A total of 26 current practice positions were formulated which address the needs of IBD patients perioperatively and in the long term following surgery. Routine screening, perioperative optimisation by oral, enteral, or parenteral nutrition, dietary fibre, and supplements were reviewed. IBD-specific situations, including management of patients with a restorative proctocolectomy, an ostomy, strictures, or short-bowel syndrome, were addressed.Conclusions: Perioperative dietary therapy improves the outcomes of IBD patients who undergo a surgical procedure. This topical review shares interdisciplinary expertise and provides guidance to optimise the outcomes of patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. taking advantage of contemporary nutrition science.

Background and Aim: Enteral nutrition (EN) is not commonly used for the treatment of adults with active Crohn’s disease (CD), despite patient interest in nutrition-based alternatives to corticosteroids and evidence of efficacy in paediatric CD. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of 2 different EN regimens on disease symptoms, nutrition and inflammatory markers in young adults with active CD. Methods: A prospective non-randomized pilot study of adults aged 16–40 years with active CD on endoscopy or imaging was undertaken. Patients were sequentially recruited to use 2 weeks of exclusive EN (EEN) followed by either 6 weeks of EEN or partial EN (PEN) with usual diet. Assessments of disease symptoms, nutrition and inflammatory markers were undertaken at baseline and throughout the treatment. Results: Thirty-eight patients with active disease were recruited. Thirty-two (84%) patients completed 2 weeks of EEN and had significant improvements in disease symptoms (p = 0.003), serum c-reactive protein (CRP; p = 0.005), insulin-like growth factor-1 (p = 0.006) and faecal calprotectin (FC; p = 0.028). During the following 6 weeks, 21 patients continued EEN (14 [67%] completed treatment) and 11 patients used PEN (9 [82%] completed treatment). Initial improvements in symptoms, CRP and nutrition markers were sustained over the next 6 weeks on both treatments. FC non-significantly increased in 5 out of 9 patients who used PEN and at week 8 FC was greater than 500 µg/g in 9 out of 14 and 7 out of 9 patients who used exclusive or PEN respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups at week 8. Conclusion: Two weeks of EEN significantly improved disease symptoms, nutrition and inflammatory markers. Further treatment with exclusive or PEN maintained initial improvements.