Nuria Cuadrado

Dr. Nuria Cuadrado

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2009 in International Journal of Plasticity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jordina FornellJordina Fornell
Jordina Fornell
ACA. Concustell
A. Concustell
SSS. Suriñach
S. Suriñach
WLW.H. Li
W.H. Li
NCNuria Cuadrado
Nuria Cuadrado
Jordi SortJordi Sort
Jordi Sort

1 May 2012 in Scripta Materialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNuria Cuadrado
Nuria Cuadrado
DCD. Casellas
D. Casellas
MAM. Anglada
M. Anglada
Emilio Jiménez PiqueEmilio Jiménez Pique
Emilio Jiménez Pique

1 January 2021 in Materials Science and Engineering: A
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DFDavid Frómeta
David Frómeta
NCNuria Cuadrado
Nuria Cuadrado
JRJ. Rehrl
J. Rehrl
CSC. Suppan
C. Suppan
TDT. Dieudonné
T. Dieudonné
DCD. Casellas
D. Casellas

1 April 2010 in Procedia Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IPIngrid Picas
Ingrid Picas
NCNuria Cuadrado
Nuria Cuadrado
DCDaniel Casellas
Daniel Casellas
AGAlexey Goez
Alexey Goez
LLLuis Llanes
Luis Llanes
Crack nucleation mechanisms in two types of cold work tool steels were evaluated under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. The effect of the microstructural constituents: the primary alloy carbides and the tempered martensite matrix, and their interaction, was identified through fractographic analysis and determination of mechanical properties such as the bending strength, σR, the fatigue limit, Δσfat, and the fracture strength of the primary carbides under static tensile stressing, σRC. The response under monotonic loading was found to be governed by the fracture of primary carbides. The cracks nucleated when the applied stresses were higher than the carbides fracture strength, accordingly depending on their properties, morphology and arrangement. Under cyclic loading, despite failure origins were located at the primary carbides and cracks emanating from them and propagating through the metallic matrix were evidenced, crack nucleation phenomena could not be explained as in monotonic loading since the applied stresses in fatigue were lower than the determined σRC. Carbides fracture was then probably caused by damage observed in the metallic matrix. Primary carbides acted as stress concentrators and strain localization was more likely occurring in the matrix around them. Thus, fatigue failure was attributed to the destabilization of the tempered martensite of the matrix, induced by the strain localization processes around carbides, which produced their breakage and gave rise to fatigue propagating cracks.Postprint (published version

1 August 2011 in Surface and Coatings Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJ. Caro
J. Caro
NCNuria Cuadrado
Nuria Cuadrado
IGI. González
I. González
DCD. Casellas
D. Casellas
JPJ.M. Prado
J.M. Prado
JDJ.C. Dürsteler
J.C. Dürsteler

1 September 2015 in Journal of the European Ceramic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NCNuria Cuadrado
Nuria Cuadrado
JSJ. Seuba
J. Seuba
DCD. Casellas
D. Casellas
MAM. Anglada
M. Anglada
Emilio Jiménez PiqueEmilio Jiménez Pique
Emilio Jiménez Pique
When indenting a brittle material with a sharp indenter, cracks can be generated at the corners of the imprint. From the length of these cracks, the fracture resistance can be estimated. This technique is simple and allows characterizing small volumes of materials, especially if nanoindentation cube-corners tips are used. For evaluation of fracture resistance, a number of different models based on crack morphology have been proposed. However, the morphology of the cracks is difficult to determine due to the small scales involved. In this work, indentation fracture with a cube-corner nanoindentation tip on different materials is investigated by FIB tomography to obtain the generated crack morphology. Experimental observations are rationalized in terms of applied load, tip geometry and crystal anisotropy. Once the crack morphology is visualized, the two most commonly used equations for calculating the fracture resistance are discussed. Finally, guidelines for better estimation of fracture resistance are proposed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author’s final draft