Yvonne Teuschl

Dr. Yvonne Teuschl

Center for Neurosciences, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 January 2017 in BMC Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMilija Mijajlovic
Milija Mijajlovic
APAleksandra Pavlović
Aleksandra Pavlović
MBMichael Brainin
Michael Brainin
WHWolf-Dieter Heiss
Wolf-Dieter Heiss
TQTerence J. Quinn
Terence J. Quinn
NBNatan M. Bornstein
Natan M. Bornstein
Post-stroke dementia (PSD) or post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) may affect up to one third of stroke survivors. Various definitions of PSCI and PSD have been described. We propose PSD as a label for any dementia following stroke in temporal relation. Various tools are available to screen and assess cognition, with few PSD-specific instruments. Choice will depend on purpose of assessment, with differing instruments needed for brief screening (e.g., Montreal Cognitive Assessment) or diagnostic formulation (e.g., NINDS VCI battery). A comprehensive evaluation should include assessment of pre-stroke cognition (e.g., using Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly), mood (e.g., using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and functional consequences of cognitive impairments (e.g., using modified Rankin Scale). A large number of biomarkers for PSD, including indicators for genetic polymorphisms, biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum, inflammatory mediators, and peripheral microRNA profiles have been proposed. Currently, no specific biomarkers have been proven to robustly discriminate vulnerable patients (‘at risk brains’) from those with better prognosis or to discriminate Alzheimer’s disease dementia from PSD. Further, neuroimaging is an important diagnostic tool in PSD. The role of computerized tomography is limited to demonstrating type and location of the underlying primary lesion and indicating atrophy and severe white matter changes. Magnetic resonance imaging is the key neuroimaging modality and has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting pathological changes, including small vessel disease. Advanced multi-modal imaging includes diffusion tensor imaging for fiber tracking, by which changes in networks can be detected. Quantitative imaging of cerebral blood flow and metabolism by positron emission tomography can differentiate between vascular dementia and degenerative dementia and show the interaction between vascular and metabolic changes. Additionally, inflammatory changes after ischemia in the brain can be detected, which may play a role together with amyloid deposition in the development of PSD. Prevention of PSD can be achieved by prevention of stroke. As treatment strategies to inhibit the development and mitigate the course of PSD, lowering of blood pressure, statins, neuroprotective drugs, and anti-inflammatory agents have all been studied without convincing evidence of efficacy. Lifestyle interventions, physical activity, and cognitive training have been recently tested, but large controlled trials are still missing.

1 November 2007 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMichaela Trapl
Michaela Trapl
PEPaul Enderle
Paul Enderle
MNMonika Nowotny
Monika Nowotny
YTYvonne Teuschl
Yvonne Teuschl
KMKarl Matz
Karl Matz
MBMichael Brainin
Michael Brainin
Background and Purpose— Acute-onset dysphagia after stroke is frequently associated with an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia. Because most screening tools are complex and biased toward fluid swallowing, we developed a simple, stepwise bedside screen that allows a graded rating with separate evaluations for nonfluid and fluid nutrition starting with nonfluid textures. The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) aims at reducing the risk of aspiration during the test to a minimum; it assesses the severity of aspiration risk and recommends a special diet accordingly. Methods— Fifty acute-stroke patients were assessed prospectively. The validity of the GUSS was established by fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. For interrater reliability, 2 independent therapists evaluated 20 patients within a 2-hour period. For external validity, another group of 30 patients was tested by stroke nurses. For content validity, the liquid score of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing was compared with the semisolid score. Results— Interrater reliability yielded excellent agreement between both raters (κ=0.835, P <0.001). In both groups, GUSS predicted aspiration risk well (area under the curve=0.77; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.02 in the 20-patient sample; area under the curve=0.933; 95% CI, 0.833 to 1.033 in the 30-patient sample). The cutoff value of 14 points resulted in 100% sensitivity, 50% specificity, and a negative predictive value of 100% in the 20-patient sample and of 100%, 69%, and 100%, respectively, in the 30-patient sample. Content validity showed a significantly higher aspiration risk with liquids compared with semisolid textures ( P =0.001), therefore confirming the subtest sequence of GUSS. Conclusions— The GUSS offers a quick and reliable method to identify stroke patients with dysphagia and aspiration risk. Such a graded assessment considers the pathophysiology of voluntary swallowing in a more differentiated fashion and provides less discomfort for those patients who can continue with their oral feeding routine for semisolid food while refraining from drinking fluids.

9 December 2014 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBM. Brainin
M. Brainin
JTJ. Tuomilehto
J. Tuomilehto
WHW.‐D. Heiss
W.‐D. Heiss
NBN. M. Bornstein
N. M. Bornstein
PBP. M. W. Bath
P. M. W. Bath
TGthe Post Stroke Cognition Study Group
the Post Stroke Cognition Study Group

1 May 2002 in Behavioral Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WBWolf U. Blanckenhorn
Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
DHDavid J. Hosken
David J. Hosken
OMOliver Martin
Oliver Martin
CRConstanze Reim
Constanze Reim
YTYvonne Teuschl
Yvonne Teuschl
PWPaul I. Ward
Paul I. Ward
Finding, assessing, rejecting, and copulating with a mate is assumed to carry fitness costs, particularly for females, that have to be traded off against fitness benefits of mating such as increased fecundity, fertility, longevity, or better quality offspring. Female dung flies, Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae), typically attempt to dislodge mounted males harassing them by vigorous shaking. Shaking duration has been shown to reflect both direct and indirect female choice in this species. The latter is an expression of the females' general reluctance to mate due to presumed costs of mating. We investigated the costs of copulation in the laboratory. Females were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups and allowed to copulate either not at all, once, or twice. The males' armored genitalia injured females internally during copula. Injuries were visible as sclerotized scars in the female ovipositor, and their occurrence increased with mating frequency. Presumably due to these injuries, mated females showed higher mortality. This effect was statistically independent from additional costs of reproduction related to oviposition, as copulation also increased lifetime egg production and tended to augment oviposition rate (eggs per day), while fertility (proportion of offspring emerged) was unaffected. We thus found high mortality costs of copulating, indicating substantial sexual conflict, which helps explain female reluctance to mate in this species.

3 September 2021 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TQTerence J Quinn
Terence J Quinn
EREdo Richard
Edo Richard
YTYvonne Teuschl
Yvonne Teuschl
TGThomas Gattringer
Thomas Gattringer
MHMelanie Hafdi
Melanie Hafdi
HMHugh S. Markus
Hugh S. Markus
Background and purpose: The optimal management of post‐stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) remains controversial. These joint European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Academy of Neurology (EAN) guidelines provide evidence‐based recommendations to assist clinicians in decision making regarding prevention, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.Methods: Guidelines were developed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and made specific recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided where insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations.Results: There was limited randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence regarding single or multicomponent interventions to prevent post‐stroke cognitive decline. Lifestyle interventions and treating vascular risk factors have many health benefits, but a cognitive effect is not proven. We found no evidence regarding routine cognitive screening following stroke, but recognize the importance of targeted cognitive assessment. We describe the accuracy of various cognitive screening tests, but found no clearly superior approach to testing. There was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for use of cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine nootropics or cognitive rehabilitation. There was limited evidence on the use of prediction tools for post‐stroke cognition. The association between PSCI and acute structural brain imaging features was unclear, although the presence of substantial white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin on brain magnetic resonance imaging may help predict cognitive outcomes.Conclusions: These guidelines highlight fundamental areas where robust evidence is lacking. Further definitive RCTs are needed, and we suggest priority areas for future research.

1 June 2007 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael Brainin
Michael Brainin
YTYvonne Teuschl
Yvonne Teuschl
LKLalit Kalra
Lalit Kalra