Alexander S. Sobolev

Prof. Dr. Alexander S. Sobolev

1. Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia</br> 2. Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow 119334, Russia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

52Years (1975-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 October 2018 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTatiana A. Slastnikova
Tatiana A. Slastnikova
AUA. V. Ulasov
A. V. Ulasov
ARAndrey A Rosenkranz
Andrey A Rosenkranz
Alexander S. SobolevAlexander S. Sobolev
Alexander S. Sobolev
A dominant area of antibody research is the extension of the use of this mighty experimental and therapeutic tool for the specific detection of molecules for diagnostics, visualization, and activity blocking. Despite the ability to raise antibodies against different proteins, numerous applications of antibodies in basic research fields, clinical practice, and biotechnology are restricted to permeabilized cells or extracellular antigens, such as membrane or secreted proteins. With the exception of small groups of autoantibodies, natural antibodies to intracellular targets cannot be used within living cells. This excludes the scope of a major class of intracellular targets, including some infamous cancer-associated molecules. Some of these targets are still not druggable via small molecules because of large flat contact areas and the absence of deep hydrophobic pockets in which small molecules can insert and perturb their activity. Thus, the development of technologies for the targeted intracellular delivery of antibodies, their fragments, or antibody-like molecules is extremely important. Various strategies for intracellular targeting of antibodies via protein-transduction domains or their mimics, liposomes, polymer vesicles, and viral envelopes, are reviewed in this article. The pitfalls, challenges, and perspectives of these technologies are discussed.

1 January 2015 in Theranostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMikhail Durymanov
Mikhail Durymanov
ARAndrey A Rosenkranz
Andrey A Rosenkranz
Alexander S. SobolevAlexander S. Sobolev
Alexander S. Sobolev
The ability of nanoparticles and macromolecules to passively accumulate in solid tumors and enhance therapeutic effects in comparison with conventional anticancer agents has resulted in the development of various multifunctional nanomedicines including liposomes, polymeric micelles, and magnetic nanoparticles. Further modifications of these nanoparticles have improved their characteristics in terms of tumor selectivity, circulation time in blood, enhanced uptake by cancer cells, and sensitivity to tumor microenvironment. These “smart” systems have enabled highly effective delivery of drugs, genes, shRNA, radioisotopes, and other therapeutic molecules. However, the resulting therapeutically relevant local concentrations of anticancer agents are often insufficient to cause tumor regression and complete elimination. Poor perfusion of inner regions of solid tumors as well as vascular barrier, high interstitial fluid pressure, and dense intercellular matrix are the main intratumoral barriers that impair drug delivery and impede uniform distribution of nanomedicines throughout a tumor. Here we review existing methods and approaches for improving tumoral uptake and distribution of nano-scaled therapeutic particles and macromolecules (i.e. nanomedicines). Briefly, these strategies include tuning physicochemical characteristics of nanomedicines, modulating physiological state of tumors with physical impacts or physiologically active agents, and active delivery of nanomedicines using cellular hitchhiking.

1 August 2000 in Immunology & Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAndrey A Rosenkranz
Andrey A Rosenkranz
DJDavid A Jans
David A Jans
Alexander S. SobolevAlexander S. Sobolev
Alexander S. Sobolev

1 August 1997 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TATamara V. Akhlynina
Tamara V. Akhlynina
DJDavid A. Jans
David A. Jans
ARAndrey A Rosenkranz
Andrey A Rosenkranz
NSNatalia Statsyuk
Natalia Statsyuk
IBIrina Y. Balashova
Irina Y. Balashova
Alexander S. SobolevAlexander S. Sobolev
Alexander S. Sobolev
Although photosensitizers, molecules that produce active oxygen species upon activation by visible light, are being extensively used in photodynamic therapy to treat cancer and other clinical conditions, problems include normal cell and tissue damage and associated side effects, which are attributable in part to the fact that cytotoxic effects are largely restricted to the plasma membrane. We have previously shown that the photosensitizer chlorin e6 has significantly higher photosensitizing activity when present in conjugates containing specific ligands and thus able to be internalized by receptor-expressing cells. In this study we use insulin-containing conjugates to which variants of the simian virus SV40 large tumor antigen nuclear localization signal (NLS) were linked to target chlorin e6 to the nucleus, a hypersensitive site for active oxygen species-induced damage. NLSs were either included as peptides cross-linked to the carrier bovine serum albumin or encoded within the sequence of a beta-galactosidase fusion protein carrier. The results for photosensitization demonstrate clearly for the first time that NLSs increase the photosensitizing activity of chlorin e6, maximally reducing the EC50 by a factor of over 2000-fold. This has wide-reaching implications for achieving efficient cell type-specific photodynamic therapy.

1 January 2000 in Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexander S. SobolevAlexander S. Sobolev
Alexander S. Sobolev
DJDavid A. Jans
David A. Jans
ARAndrey A Rosenkranz
Andrey A Rosenkranz

1 January 2011 in Molecular Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AUAlexey V Ulasov
Alexey V Ulasov
YKYuri V Khramtsov
Yuri V Khramtsov
GTGeorgiy A Trusov
Georgiy A Trusov
ARAndrey A Rosenkranz
Andrey A Rosenkranz
ESEugene D Sverdlov
Eugene D Sverdlov
Alexander S. SobolevAlexander S. Sobolev
Alexander S. Sobolev
We have evaluated the key properties of the polyethylenimine (PEI)-polyethylene glycol (PEG)-TAT peptide polyplex nanoparticles including their behavior in cells and compared them with the transfection efficacy (TE) using 11 different cell lines. We found statistically significant positive correlation between TE and the share of 50–75 nm fraction in the whole mixture of nanoparticles estimated with atomic force microscopy. Variations in PEG/PEI and N/P ratios (PEI nitrogen to DNA phosphate ratio) enabled us to find their optimal combinations, which resulted in up to 100% TE for several cell lines. Surfaces of the TE dependence of both PEG/PEI and N/P turned out to be similar in appearance for all investigated cell lines, while maximum TEs were different. We investigated subcellular transport kinetics and unpacking of the polyplex nanoparticles labeled with quantum dots (plasmid DNA) and AlexaFluor647 (block-copolymer part) using Förster Resonance Energy Transfer approach. The results demonstrated clear and statistically significant positive correlation of TE with the cellular uptake rate of the nanoparticles and negative correlation with the rate constant of their unpacking within endo/lysosomal compartments in the living cells.