N ⁶ -Methyladenosine (m ⁶ A) refers to methylation modification of the adenosine nucleotide acid at the nitrogen-6 position. Many conventional computational methods for identifying N ⁶ -methyladenosine sites are limited by the small amount of data available. Taking advantage of the thousands of m ⁶ A sites detected by high-throughput sequencing, it is now possible to discover the characteristics of m ⁶ A sequences using deep learning techniques. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to use word embedding and deep neural networks for m ⁶ A prediction from mRNA sequences. Using four deep neural networks, we developed a model inferred from a larger sequence shifting window that can predict m ⁶ A accurately and robustly. Four prediction schemes were built with various RNA sequence representations and optimized convolutional neural networks. The soft voting results from the four deep networks were shown to outperform all of the state-of-the-art methods. We evaluated these predictors mentioned above on a rigorous independent test data set and proved that our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art predictors. The training, independent, and cross-species testing data sets are much larger than in previous studies, which could help to avoid the problem of overfitting. Furthermore, an online prediction web server implementing the four proposed predictors has been built and is available at http://server.malab.cn/Gene2vec/ .

MicroRNAs (miRNA) play critical roles in regulating gene expressions at the posttranscriptional levels. The prediction of disease-related miRNA is vital to the further investigation of miRNA’s involvement in the pathogenesis of disease. In previous years, biological experimentation is the main method used to identify whether miRNA was associated with a given disease. With increasing biological information and the appearance of new miRNAs every year, experimental identification of disease-related miRNAs poses considerable difficulties (e.g. time-consumption and high cost). Because of the limitations of experimental methods in determining the relationship between miRNAs and diseases, computational methods have been proposed. A key to predict potential disease-related miRNA based on networks is the calculation of similarity among diseases and miRNA over the networks. Different strategies lead to different results. In this review, we summarize the existing computational approaches and present the confronted difficulties that help understand the research status. We also discuss the principles, efficiency and differences among these methods. The comprehensive comparison and discussion elucidated in this work provide constructive insights into the matter.

The development of transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) has enabled researchers to better identify and interpret causal genes in many diseases. However, there are currently no resources providing a comprehensive listing of gene-disease associations discovered by TWAS from published GWAS summary statistics. TWAS analyses are also difficult to conduct due to the complexity of TWAS software pipelines. To address these issues, we introduce a new resource called webTWAS, which integrates a database of the most comprehensive disease GWAS datasets currently available with credible sets of potential causal genes identified by multiple TWAS software packages. Specifically, a total of 235 064 gene-diseases associations for a wide range of human diseases are prioritized from 1298 high-quality downloadable European GWAS summary statistics. Associations are calculated with seven different statistical models based on three popular and representative TWAS software packages. Users can explore associations at the gene or disease level, and easily search for related studies or diseases using the MeSH disease tree. Since the effects of diseases are highly tissue-specific, webTWAS applies tissue-specific enrichment analysis to identify significant tissues. A user-friendly web server is also available to run custom TWAS analyses on user-provided GWAS summary statistics data. webTWAS is freely available at http://www.webtwas.net.

Circular RNA (circRNA) is mainly generated by the splice donor of a downstream exon joining to an upstream splice acceptor, a phenomenon known as backsplicing. It has been reported that circRNA can function as microRNA (miRNA) sponges, transcriptional regulators, or potential biomarkers. The availability of massive non-polyadenylated transcriptomes data has facilitated the genome-wide identification of thousands of circRNAs. Several circRNA detection tools or pipelines have recently been developed, and it is essential to provide useful guidelines on these pipelines for users, including a comprehensive and unbiased comparison. Here, we provide an improved and easy-to-use circRNA read simulator that can produce mimicking backsplicing reads supporting circRNAs deposited in CircBase. Moreover, we compared the performance of 11 circRNA detection tools on both simulated and real datasets. We assessed their performance regarding metrics such as precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and Area under Curve. It is concluded that no single method dominated on all of these metrics. Among all of the state-of-the-art tools, CIRI, CIRCexplorer, and KNIFE, which achieved better balanced performance between their precision and sensitivity, compared favorably to the other methods.

A clear identification of the primary site of tumor is of great importance to the next targeted site-specific treatments and could efficiently improve patient‘s overall survival. Even though many classifiers based on gene expression had been proposed to predict the tumor primary, only a few studies focus on using DNA methylation (DNAm) profiles to develop classifiers, and none of them compares the performance of classifiers based on different profiles. We introduced novel selection strategies to identify highly tissue-specific CpG sites and then used the random forest approach to construct the classifiers to predict the origin of tumors. We also compared the prediction performance by applying similar strategy on miRNA expression profiles. Our analysis indicated that these classifiers had an accuracy of 96.05% (Maximum–Relevance–Maximum–Distance: 90.02–99.99%) or 95.31% (principal component analysis: 79.82–99.91%) on independent DNAm datasets, and an overall accuracy of 91.30% (range 79.33–98.74%) on independent miRNA test sets for predicting tumor origin. This suggests that our feature selection methods are very effective to identify tissue-specific biomarkers and the classifiers we developed can efficiently predict the origin of tumors. We also developed a user-friendly webserver that helps users to predict the tumor origin by uploading miRNA expression or DNAm profile of their interests. The webserver, and relative data, code are accessible at http://server.malab.cn/MMCOP/. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.