David John Saxby

Prof. David John Saxby

Griffith Centre for Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2016 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDavid John Saxby
David John Saxby
LMLuca Modenese
Luca Modenese
ABAdam L. Bryant
Adam L. Bryant
GPGerus Pauline
Gerus Pauline
Bryce Adrian KillenBryce Adrian Killen
Bryce Adrian Killen
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd
We explored the tibiofemoral contact forces and the relative contributions of muscles and external loads to those contact forces during various gait tasks. Second, we assessed the relationships between external gait measures and contact forces. A calibrated electromyography-driven neuromusculoskeletal model estimated the tibiofemoral contact forces during walking (1.44±0.22ms(-1)), running (4.38±0.42ms(-1)) and sidestepping (3.58±0.50ms(-1)) in healthy adults (n=60, 27.3±5.4years, 1.75±0.11m, and 69.8±14.0kg). Contact forces increased from walking (∼1-2.8 BW) to running (∼3-8 BW), sidestepping had largest maximum total (8.47±1.57 BW) and lateral contact forces (4.3±1.05 BW), while running had largest maximum medial contact forces (5.1±0.95 BW). Relative muscle contributions increased across gait tasks (up to 80-90% of medial contact forces), and peaked during running for lateral contact forces (∼90%). Knee adduction moment (KAM) had weak relationships with tibiofemoral contact forces (all R(2)<0.36) and the relationships were gait task-specific. Step-wise regression of multiple external gait measures strengthened relationships (0.20

18 April 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CPClaudio Pizzolato
Claudio Pizzolato
MRMonica Reggiani
Monica Reggiani
DSDavid John Saxby
David John Saxby
ECElena Ceseracciu
Elena Ceseracciu
LMLuca Modenese
Luca Modenese
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd
Biofeedback assisted rehabilitation and intervention technologies have the potential to modify clinically relevant biomechanics. Gait retraining has been used to reduce the knee adduction moment, a surrogate of medial tibiofemoral joint loading often used in knee osteoarthritis research. In this paper, we present an electromyogram-driven neuromusculoskeletal model of the lower-limb to estimate, in real-time, the tibiofemoral joint loads. The model included 34 musculotendon units spanning the hip, knee, and ankle joints. Full-body inverse kinematics, inverse dynamics, and musculotendon kinematics were solved in real-time from motion capture and force plate data to estimate the knee medial tibiofemoral contact force (MTFF). We analyzed five healthy subjects while they were walking on an instrumented treadmill with visual biofeedback of their MTFF. Each subject was asked to modify their gait in order to vary the magnitude of their MTFF. All subjects were able to increase their MTFF, whereas only three subjects could decrease it, and only after receiving verbal suggestions about possible gait modification strategies. Results indicate the important role of knee muscle activation patterns in modulating the MTFF. While this paper focused on the knee, the technology can be extended to examine the musculoskeletal tissue loads at different sites of the human body.

1 November 2016 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDavid John Saxby
David John Saxby
ABAdam L. Bryant
Adam L. Bryant
LMLuca Modenese
Luca Modenese
GPGerus Pauline
Gerus Pauline
Bryce Adrian KillenBryce Adrian Killen
Bryce Adrian Killen
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd
Tepping gait tasks. Methods A computational EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal model was used to estimate the muscle and tibiofemoral contact forces in those with single-bundle combined semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autograft ACLR (n = 104, 29.7 ± 6.5 yr, 78.1 ± 14.4 kg) and healthy controls (n = 60, 27.5 ± 5.4 yr, 67.8 ± 14.0 kg) during walking (1.4 ± 0.2 m·s−1), running (4.5 ± 0.5 m·s−1) and sidestepping (3.7 ± 0.6 m·s−1). Within the computational model, the semitendinosus of ACLR participants was adjusted to account for literature reported strength deficits and morphological changes subsequent to autograft harvesting. Results ACLR had smaller maximum total and medial tibiofemoral contact forces (~80% of control values, scaled to bodyweight) during the different gait tasks. Compared with controls, ACLR were found to have a smaller maximum knee flexion moment, which explained the smaller tibiofemoral contact forces. Similarly, compared with controls, ACLR had both a smaller maximum knee flexion angle and knee flexion excursion during running and sidestepping, which may have concentrated the articular contact forces to smaller areas within the tibiofemoral joint. Mean relative muscle and external load contributions to the tibiofemoral contact forces were not significantly different between ACLR and controls. Conclusions ACLR had lower bodyweight-scaled tibiofemoral contact forces during walking, running, and sidestepping, likely due to lower knee flexion moments and straighter knee during the different gait tasks. The relative contributions of muscles and external loads to the contact forces were equivalent between groups....

16 July 2020 in Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDavid John Saxby
David John Saxby
Bryce Adrian KillenBryce Adrian Killen
Bryce Adrian Killen
CPClaudio Pizzolato
Claudio Pizzolato
CCC. P. Carty
C. P. Carty
LDL. E. Diamond
L. E. Diamond
DLD. G. Lloyd
D. G. Lloyd

1 February 2017 in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDavid John Saxby
David John Saxby
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd

18 October 2017 in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CPClaudio Pizzolato
Claudio Pizzolato
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd
RBRod S. Barrett
Rod S. Barrett
JCJill L. Cook
Jill L. Cook
MZMing H. Zheng
Ming H. Zheng
DSDavid John Saxby
David John Saxby
Musculoskeletal tissues respond to optimal mechanical signals (e.g., strains) through anabolic adaptations, while mechanical signals above and below optimal levels cause tissue catabolism. If an individual’s physical behaviour could be altered to generate optimal mechanical signalling to musculoskeletal tissues, then targeted strengthening and/or repair would be possible. We propose new bioinspired technologies to provide real-time biofeedback of relevant mechanical signals to guide training and rehabilitation. In this review we provide a description of how wearable devices may be used in conjunction with computational rigid-body and continuum models of musculoskeletal tissues to produce real-time estimates of localised tissue stresses and strains. It is proposed that these bioinspired technologies will facilitate a new approach to physical training that promotes tissue strengthening and/or repair through optimal tissue loading.