Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu

Dr. Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2011 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJacob Scott
Jacob Scott
YTYa-Yu Tsai
Ya-Yu Tsai
PCPrakash Chinnaiyan
Prakash Chinnaiyan
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael YuHsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu

7 March 2014 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKamran A. Ahmed
Kamran A. Ahmed
JFJessica M. Freilich
Jessica M. Freilich
YAYazan Abuodeh
Yazan Abuodeh
NFNicholas Figura
Nicholas Figura
NPNeha Patel
Neha Patel
NRNikhil G. Rao
Nikhil G. Rao

1 April 2012 in Cancer Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael YuHsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
YTYa-Yu Tsai
Ya-Yu Tsai
SHSarah E. Hoffe
Sarah E. Hoffe
Background: Bone metastases occur frequently in patients with advanced cancer and are a serious complication of cancer. The decision to treat is often individualized, based on each patient's clinical presentation, life expectancy, and quality of life. Methods: We reviewed the current literature pertaining to management of metastatic disease to bone, and the medical, radiotherapeutic, and surgical treatment options for management of bone metastasis are discussed. Results: Current management of skeletal metastasis includes analgesia, systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. We propose treatment algorithms for management of vertebral and nonvertebral bone metastases and suggest individualized interventions based on clinical presentation. Conclusions: Management of bone metastases is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The goal of treatment is often palliative, and intervention and treatment regimens should be individualized based on the specific clinical presentation of each patient.

30 April 2020 in Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAnupam Rishi
Anupam Rishi
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael YuHsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu

1 July 2007 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael YuHsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
DSDanny Y. Song
Danny Y. Song
YTYa-Yu Tsai
Ya-Yu Tsai
TTTravis Thompson
Travis Thompson
DFDeborah A. Frassica
Deborah A. Frassica
TDTheodore L. DeWeese
Theodore L. DeWeese

1 August 2016 in Melanoma Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPBindiya G. Patel
Bindiya G. Patel
KAKamran A. Ahmed
Kamran A. Ahmed
PJPeter A.S. Johnstone
Peter A.S. Johnstone
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael YuHsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
AEArnold Etame
Arnold Etame
The combined use of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and MEK inhibitor trametinib has been found to improve survival over dabrafenib alone. The management of melanoma brain metastases continues to present challenges. In this study, we report our initial experience in the management of melanoma brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. We identified six patients treated with SRS for 17 brain metastases within 3 months of BRAF and MEK inhibitor administration. The median planning target volume was 0.42 cm3 (range: 0.078–2.08 cm3). The median treatment dose was 21 Gy (range 18–24 Gy). The median follow-up of all lesions from SRS was 10.6 months (range 5.8–28.5 months). One lesion was found to undergo local failure 21.7 months following SRS treatment. The median overall survival was 20.0 months (range 6.1–31.8 months) from the time of SRS treatment and 23.1 months (range: 12.1–30.9 months) from the date of BRAFi and MEKi administration. There was no evidence of increased nor unexpected toxicity with the two modalities combined. In this initial experience of melanoma brain metastases treated with BRAF and MEK inhibition with SRS, we find the two modalities can be combined safely. These outcomes should be assessed further in prospective evaluations.