Atrial fibrosis is a hallmark of atrial cardiomyopathy and plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF), contributing to its onset and progression. The mechanisms underlying atrial fibrosis are multifaceted, involving stretch-induced fibroblast activation, oxidative stress, inflammation, and coagulation pathways. Variations in fibrosis types—reactive and replacement fibrosis—are influenced by patient-specific factors such as age, sex, and comorbidities, complicating therapeutic approaches. The heterogeneity of fibrosis leads to distinct electrophysiological abnormalities that promote AF via reentrant activity and enhanced automaticity mechanisms. Despite advancements in imaging, such as late gadolinium enhancement CMR and electroanatomical mapping, challenges in accurately quantifying fibrosis persist. Emerging therapeutic strategies include antifibrotic agents targeting the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, novel pathways like TGF-β signaling, and cardio-metabolic drugs like SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Innovative interventions, including microRNA modulation and lipid nanoparticle-based therapies, show promise but require validation. Knowledge gaps remain in correlating clinical outcomes with fibrosis patterns and optimizing diagnostic tools. Future research should focus on precise phenotyping, integrating advanced imaging with molecular biomarkers, and conducting robust trials to evaluate antifibrotic therapies’ efficacy in reducing AF burden and related complications.

Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials

The global rise in diabetes prevalence has significantly contributed to the increasing burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Diabetes accelerates atherosclerosis through mechanisms such as hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and epigenetic dysregulation, leading to unstable plaques and an elevated risk of cardiovascular events. Despite advancements in controlling traditional risk factors like dyslipidemia and hypertension, a considerable residual cardiovascular risk persists, highlighting the need for innovative therapeutic approaches. Emerging treatments, including sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, epigenetic modulators, and RNA-based therapies, are showing promise in addressing the unique challenges of diabetes-associated ASCVD. Precision medicine strategies, such as nanoparticle-based drug delivery and cell-specific therapies, offer further potential for mitigating cardiovascular complications. Advances in multiomics and systems biology continue to deepen our understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. This review synthesizes recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of diabetes-related atherosclerosis, offering a roadmap for future research and precision medicine approaches to mitigate cardiovascular risk in this growing population.

Amyand’s hernia is defined as an inguinal hernia, containing the appendix within the hernia sac. Incidence of this rare condition rises up to 1% (0.19–1.7%) of all inguinal hernia cases. Inflammation of the appendix within the inguinal sac is even rarer, as it corresponds to 0.1% (0.07–0.13%) of all Amyand’s hernia cases. After a comprehensive review of the limited relevant literature, we aim through this review study to describe the pathophysiology of inflammation of the appendix – contained in the hernia sac – and present the latest data about the diagnostic approach and surgical treatment of Amyand’s hernia.

Current guidelines suggest that asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) is independently associated with increased risks of stroke and mortality compared with symptomatic AF. Considering that recent investigations have provided conflicting results, the present study aimed to evaluate the association between symptom status and clinical outcomes in patients with AF. Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched until 25 March 2024. Triple-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Thirty-six studies (217 850 participants) were included. Based on the frequentist analysis, symptomatic individuals had no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) .97, 95% confidence interval (CI) .80–1.17], cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI .72–1.49), thromboembolism (HR 1.06, 95% CI .87–1.28), stroke (HR 1.06, 95% CI .84–1.34), hospitalization (HR 1.34, 95% CI .89–2.02), and myocardial infarction (HR .98, 95% CI .70–1.36), compared to the asymptomatic group. Symptomatic patients had a 33% increased risk of new-onset heart failure (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19–1.49) and a 30% lower risk of progression to permanent AF (HR .70, 95% CI .54–.89). The Bayesian analysis yielded comparable results, yet the association between symptom status and new-onset heart failure was not significant (HR 1.27, 95% credible interval .76–1.93; Bayes factor = 1.2). Symptomatic patients had higher odds of receiving antiarrhythmic drugs (odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.33–2.03) and ablation therapy (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06–2.05) compared to asymptomatic cases. The risk of major clinical outcomes did not differ between individuals with and without AF-related symptoms. Asymptomatic patients had a greater hazard of progression to permanent AF. Major clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic vs. asymptomatic atrial fibrillation. AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; CrI, credible interval; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio. * A two-tailed P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant