Denis Mottet

Dr. Denis Mottet

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2007 in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDenis Mottet
Denis Mottet
CVCASTRONOVO VINCENT
CASTRONOVO VINCENT

24 April 2018 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAnna Lechanteur
Anna Lechanteur
VSVincent Sanna
Vincent Sanna
ADAmandine Duchemin
Amandine Duchemin
BEBrigitte Alice Evrard
Brigitte Alice Evrard
DMDenis Mottet
Denis Mottet
GPGéraldine Piel
Géraldine Piel
In recent year, cationic liposomes have gained a lot of attention for siRNA delivery. Despite this, intracellular barriers as endosomal escape and cytosolic delivery of siRNA still represent a challeng, as well as the cytotoxicity due to cationic lipids. To address these issues, we developed four liposomal formulations, composed of two different cationic lipids (DOTAP and DC-Cholesterol) and different ratio of co-lipids (cholesterol and DOPE). The objective is to dissect these impacts on siRNA efficacy and cytotoxicity. Liposomes were complexed to siRNA at six different N/P molar ratios, physico-chemical properties were characterized, and consequently, N/P 2.5, 5 and 10 were selected for in vitro experiments. We have shown that cytotoxicity is influenced by the N/P ratio, the concentration of cationic lipid, as well as the nature of the cationic lipid. For instance, cell viability decreased by 70% with liposomes composed of DOTAP/Cholesterol/DOPE 1/0.75/0.5 at a N/P ratio 10, whereas the same formulation at a N/P ratio of 2.5 was safe. Interestingly, we have observed differences in terms of mRNA knock-down efficiency, whereas the transfection rate was quite similar for each formulation. Liposomes containing 50% of DOPE induced a mRNA silencing of around 80%. This study allowed us to highlight crucial parameters in order to develop lipoplexes which are safe, and which induce an efficient intracytoplasmic release of siRNA.

3 February 2012 in Cell Death & Differentiation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPP Peixoto
P Peixoto
VCV Castronovo
V Castronovo
NMN Matheus
N Matheus
CPC Polese
C Polese
Olivier PeulenOlivier Peulen
Olivier Peulen
DMDenis Mottet
Denis Mottet

2 August 2023 in Journal of Controlled Release
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBManon Berger
Manon Berger
FTFrançois Toussaint
François Toussaint
SDSanaa Ben Djemaa
Sanaa Ben Djemaa
JLJulie Laloy
Julie Laloy
HPHélène Pendeville
Hélène Pendeville
GPGéraldine Piel
Géraldine Piel

17 November 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAmandine Duchemin
Amandine Duchemin
TOTina O’gRady
Tina O’gRady
SHSarah Hanache
Sarah Hanache
AMAgnès Mereau
Agnès Mereau
MTMarc Thiry
Marc Thiry
DMDenis Mottet
Denis Mottet
The U6 snRNA, the core catalytic component of the spliceosome, is extensively modified post-transcriptionally, with 2’-O-methylation being most common. However, how U6 2’-O-methylation is regulated remains largely unknown. Here we report that TFIP11, the human homolog of the yeast spliceosome disassembly factor Ntr1, localizes to nucleoli and Cajal Bodies and is essential for the 2’-O-methylation of U6. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that TFIP11 knockdown reduces the association of U6 snRNA with fibrillarin and associated snoRNAs, therefore altering U6 2′-O-methylation. We show U6 snRNA hypomethylation is associated with changes in assembly of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP leading to defects in spliceosome assembly and alterations in splicing fidelity. Strikingly, this function of TFIP11 is independent of the RNA helicase DHX15, its known partner in yeast. In sum, our study demonstrates an unrecognized function for TFIP11 in U6 snRNP modification and U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP assembly, identifying TFIP11 as a critical spliceosome assembly regulator.

1 December 2010 in Current Cancer Drug Targets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDenis Mottet
Denis Mottet
VCV. Castronovo
V. Castronovo
Judah Folkman was the first in 1971 to observe and report that cancer growth and dissemination were dependent on angiogenesis - the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vasculature. For almost 40 years, this concept has inspired generations of researchers to identify anti-angiogenic molecules that could be used therapeutically to stop blood vessels formation and starve tumors of nutrients and oxygen. Tumor angiogenesis requires complex cellular and molecular interactions between endothelial and cancer cells. In response to external stimuli such as hypoxia, cancer cells secrete pro-angiogenic factors into the extracellular matrix that activate the surrounding endothelial cells to proliferate, migrate and form new blood vessels. So, vascularization of malignant lesions depends on the expression of specific genes in both endothelial and tumor cells and accumulating evidence shows that several members of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) family play key roles in the regulation of these genes. Indeed, numerous in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that inhibitors of HDAC modulate angiogenic gene expression in both endothelial and cancer cells and disturb the delicate and complex balance between the collective action of pro-angiogenic factors and angiogenesis inhibitors. Thus, HDAC are currently recognized as promising targets for the development of anti-cancer drugs. This review is an effort to present and discuss the role, functions and mechanisms of action of HDAC during tumor-driven angiogenesis as well as a brief summary of the clinical status of the main HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) currently under development in cancer therapy.