Nuciferine (Nuci), the main aporphine alkaloid component in lotus leaf, was reported to reduce lipid accumulation in vitro. Herein we investigated whether Nuci prevents obesity in high fat diet (HFD)-fed mice and the underlying mechanism in liver/HepG2 hepatocytes and epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) /adipocytes. Male C57BL/6J mice were fed with HFD supplemented with Nuci (0.10%) for 12 weeks. We found that Nuci significantly reduced body weight and fat mass, improved glycolipid profiles, and enhanced energy expenditure in HFD-fed mice. Nuci also ameliorated hepatic steatosis and decreased the size of adipocytes. Furthermore, Nuci remarkably promoted the phosphorylation of AMPK, suppressed lipogenesis (SREBP1, FAS, ACC), promoted lipolysis (HSL, ATGL), and increased the expressions of adipokines (FGF21, ZAG) in liver and eWAT. Besides, fatty acid oxidation in liver and thermogenesis in eWAT were also activated by Nuci. Similar results were further observed at cellular level, and these beneficial effects of Nuci in cells were abolished by an effective AMPK inhibitor compound C. In conclusion, Nuci supplementation prevented HFD-induced obesity, attenuated hepatic steatosis, and reduced lipid accumulation in liver/hepatocytes and eWAT/adipocytes through regulating AMPK-mediated FAS/HSL pathway. Our findings provide novel insight into the clinical application of Nuci in treating obesity and related complications.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) activate host antitumor immunity to kill tumor cells. However, ICI therapy may be accompanied by a series of immunotherapy‐related adverse effects (irAEs) caused by activated autoreactive T cells. Glucocorticoids are the mainstream therapy for irAEs. However, the usage, dosage and course of treatment of irAEs with glucocorticoids differs from those used in classic autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, the long‐term use of large doses of glucocorticoids may cause serious adverse effects. In this article, the mechanism, dosage forms, adverse effects and management of glucocorticoids are described in detail, providing references and suggestions for oncologists to use glucocorticoids in the treatment of irAEs.

Background: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a relatively common autosomal dominant disorder. The most common vascular abnormality in patients with NF1 is bilateral or unilateral renal artery stenosis.Case report: A 16-year-old boy presented with a headache of 4-year duration and was found to be moderately hypertensive. On physical examination, axillary freckling and multiple café-au-lait spots were revealed over the trunk, while numerous small nodules were palpable on the limbs. Biopsy of subcutaneous nodule showed neurofibroma. Lisch nodules were identified on slit-lamp examination and grade I hypertensive retinopathy was present on fundoscopy. Clinical laboratory investigations revealed that renal and liver function tests, blood cells count, urinalysis, serum electrolytes, serum levels of renin and aldosterone, and 24-hour urine levels of catecholamines were all within normal ranges. Abdominal ultrasound and CT were normal. Both kidneys were of normal size. CT angiography showed right renal artery stenosis (>90%) at the ostium. The final diagnosis of NF1 with right renal artery stenosis and secondary hypertension was then made. The patient was treated with Procardin (30 mg/d) and improved with a significant decline in blood pressure. The main outcomes were to control blood pressure without necessarily proceeding with PTRA. We also present a review of the literature.Conclusions: NF1 may present with hypertension due to renal artery stenosis in children. All young patients (<30 year) with hypertension should be clinically screened for secondary causes of hypertension, including NF1, so that renal revascularization can be offered before permanent end organ damage has occurred. First-line management using medication alone could be appropriate, keeping the interventional options for when the patient's condition deteriorates.

This study aimed to investigate preoperative somatostatin analogs (SSAs) treatment on the surgical outcome in patients with acromegaly. An analysis of 358 patients with acromegaly was conducted. The preoperative medical therapy group (81 patients) received SSA treatment for at least 3 months prior to surgery, while the primary surgery group (277 patients) underwent transsphenoidal surgery directly. Follow-up duration was ≥3 months. Tumor invasion was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classified according to the Knosp grading system. Most patients were diagnosed with macroadenoma. Among all patients (Knosp grades 0–4), preoperative SSA therapy did not significantly improve the curative effect of surgery, according to the levels of growth hormone (GH) and/or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) markers. In patients with macroadenoma (Knosp grades 1–3), the remission rates were significantly higher in the SSA group compared to the surgery group when considering GH (56.4% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.048) and IGF-1 (43.2% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.004). In the preoperative medical therapy group, long-term use of SSAs (>6 months) led to higher remission rates (GH, 72.2% vs. 51.0%; and IGF-1, 61.1% vs. 29.8%; P = 0.12 and 0.02, respectively]. The long-term preoperative SSAs treatment may improve the surgical curative rate in acromegalic patients with invasive macroadenomas (Knosp grades 1–3).

As a new class of antitumor drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable efficacy toward the treatment of various malignant tumors. By virtue of their targets and mechanisms of action, ICIs can cause autoimmune and inflammatory effects, termed as immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) and unlike the adverse reactions of traditional therapies, irAEs are occult and not fixed, with some serious adverse reactions forcing patients to stop treatment which might even affect their survival. Therefore, with the wide clinical application of ICIs, clinicians need to fully understand the possible adverse reactions of these drugs and devise reasonable treatment strategies to improve the survival rate and therapeutic effects of patients receiving ICIs. In this article, we review the incidence, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of immune‐related endocrine events that may occur with the administration of ICIs.