Background: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare lysosomal storage disease causing progressive loss of target organ function. All renal cell types are involved from the early stages, even before clinical signs can be detected. FD-specific therapies can stop/mitigate disease progression. Thus, it is important to validate early markers of renal lesions so that they can be adopted as criteria for timely treatment initiation. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed and extensively evaluated 21 FD case patients; this evaluation included a kidney biopsy. We looked for the influence of pathological findings on the management of FD patients. In addition, we investigated the association between general and FD-specific features and long-term patients’ outcomes. We defined a combined endpoint as being at least one of the following: 50% decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, kidney failure (KF), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or death and mortality. Results: Our cohort of 21 FD patients (11 males and 10 females) was stratified according to the presence of the combined endpoint: group 1 (n = 15) included patients without the combined endpoint, while group 2 (n = 6) patients reached the combined endpoint outcome. Patients from group 2 presented lower mean baseline eGFR (72.2 ± 38.7 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. 82.5 ± 26.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) without statistical significance (p = 0.44), but significantly (p = 0.22) higher median baseline proteinuria (2.7 g/24 h vs. 0.4 g/24 h). Specific lysosomal deposits were identified in all patients. Segmental sclerosis was present in all patients with the combined endpoint and in only 33% of patients without the combined endpoint (p = 0.009). Global sclerosis and interstitial fibrosis were present in both groups, with no significant differences. A total of 15 out of the 16 treatment-naïve patients (7 males and 9 females) started FD-specific therapy after kidney biopsy. Treatment was initiated in all male FD patients and in 8 female patients. In 2 females, pathological findings in kidney biopsy offered important reasons to start FD treatment, although specific criteria of the Romanian protocol for prescription of FD-specific therapy were still not fulfilled. Cox univariate analysis showed that every increase in 24 h proteinuria with 1 g is associated with a 65% risk of developing the combined endpoint (HR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.05–2.58; p = 0.02), and that the presence of segmental sclerosis increased the risk of developing the combined endpoint by 51.3 times (HR = 51.3; 95% CI: 95% CI: 1.67–103.5; p = 0.01). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the cumulative risk of developing the combined endpoint was higher in patients in whom segmental sclerosis (100% vs. 0%, log-rank test, p = 0.03) was present. Conclusions: Histological evaluation is an important tool for the detection of early kidney involvement and provides additional support to the early initiation of FD-specific therapy. Presence of segmental sclerosis can predict the long-term outcomes of kidney disease deterioration and mortality and may be used as an early indicator of disease progression. Additionally, in the absence of other criteria according to current guidelines, specific FD renal lesions as revealed by kidney biopsy might become a distinct criterion to initiate FD therapy.

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a distressing symptom that affects both dialysis and non-dialysis patients, significantly impairing their quality of life. Despite its multifactorial pathophysiology, no gold-standard treatment has been established. This review explores various therapeutic options and evaluates their effectiveness based on recent clinical studies and meta-analyses. Therapies targeting novel mechanisms have evolved in recent years. Difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, represents a breakthrough in systemic treatment, demonstrating efficacy with a favorable safety profile. Another opioid-based therapy, nalfurafine, has shown notable symptom relief in multiple clinical studies, with a low risk of abuse. Sertraline, an antidepressant, offers another alternative, although its delayed onset remains a limitation. Nonpharmacologic approaches are also evolving. Phototherapy, particularly UV-B therapy, modulates the immune response, reduces inflammation, and effectively alleviates itching in hemodialysis patients. Personalized treatment strategies are crucial, as responses vary among patients. Further research, including comparative and long-term studies, is essential to refine treatment algorithms and improve patient outcomes. By integrating new pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options, CKD-aP management is shifting toward a more tailored and effective approach that addresses the individual needs of each patient.

Background: Data on diuretic treatment in nephrotic syndrome (NS) are scarce. Our goal was to assess the non-inferiority of the combined oral diuretics (furosemide/hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride) compared to intravenous (i.v.) furosemide in patients with NS and resistant edema. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial on 22 patients with resistant nephrotic edema (RNE), defined as hypervolemia and a FENa < 0.2%. Based on a computer-generated 1:1 randomization, we assigned patients to receive either intravenous furosemide (40 mg bolus and then continuous administration of 5 mg/h) or oral furosemide (40 mg/day) and hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride (50/5 mg/day) for a period of 5 days. Clinical and laboratory measurements were performed daily. Hydration status was assessed by bioimpedance on day 1 and at the end of day 5 after treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was weight change from baseline to day 5. Secondary endpoints were hydration status change measured by bioimpedance and safety outcomes (low blood pressure, severe electrolyte disturbances, acute kidney injury and worsening hypervolemia). Results: Primary endpoint analysis showed that after 5 days of treatment, there was a significant difference in weight change from baseline between groups [adjusted mean difference: −3.33 kg (95% CI: −6.34 to −0.31), p = 0.03], with a higher mean weight change in the oral diuretic treatment group [−7.10 kg (95% CI: −18.30 to −4.30) vs. −4.55 kg (95%CI: −6.73 to −2.36)]. Secondary endpoint analysis showed that there was no significant difference between groups regarding hydration status change [adjusted mean difference: −0.05 L (95% CI: −2.6 to 2.6), p = 0.96], with a mean hydration status change in the oral diuretic treatment group of −4.71 L (95% CI: −6.87 to −2.54) and −3.91 L (95% CI: −5.69 to −2.13) in the i.v. diuretic treatment group. We observed a significant decrease in adjusted mean serum sodium of −2.15 mmol/L [(95% CI: −4.25 to −0.05), p = 0.04]), favored by the combined oral diuretic treatment [−2.70 mmol/L (95% CI: −4.89 to −0.50) vs. −0.10 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.30 to 1.10)]. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of adverse events. Conclusions: A combination of oral diuretics based on furosemide, amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide is non-inferior to i.v. furosemide in weight control of patients with RNE and a similar safety profile.

Background: Molecular analysis in patients with nephrolithiasis (NL) and/or nephrocalcinosis (NC) enables more accurate evaluation of underlying etiologies. The existing clinical evidence regarding genetic testing in adults with NL comprises only a few cohort studies. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 49 adult patients diagnosed with NL and/or NC from a single center, on whom we performed a genetic test using a nephrolithiasis panel. We reviewed the phenotype of the patients and compared the cases with positive and negative molecular diagnosis. Results: In total, 49 adult patients with NL and/or NC underwent genetic testing. Of the tested patients, 29 (59.2%) patients had 24 abnormal variants in 14 genes. Mendelian diseases were diagnosed in 14 (28.6%) cases: cystinuria (SLC3A1, SLC7A9; n = 4), hereditary distal renal tubular acidosis (SLC4A1; n = 3), Dent disease (CLCN5; n = 2), familial hypomagnesaemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis (CLDN16; n = 1), infantile hypercalcemia type 1 (CYP24A1; n = 1), primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (AGXT; n = 1), Bartter syndrome type 2 (KCNJ1; n = 1), and autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (UMOD; n = 1). Eight (16.3%) patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic monoallelic variants as predisposing factors for NL and/or NC, and seven (14.3%) had biallelic or monoallelic variants of uncertain significance. Patients with positive genetic tests had a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.03) and more frequent NL associated with NC (p = 0.007) and were unlikely to have arterial hypertension (p = 0.03) when compared with patients with negative tests. Conclusions: Our study shows an increased effectiveness of molecular diagnosis and highlights the benefits of genetic testing. NL associated with NC and the presence of chronic kidney disease are the characteristics that should prompt the clinician to suspect an inherited form of NL and/or NC.

Background: Alport syndrome (AS) is one of the most common monogenic kidney disorders. Recent studies have highlighted the modifier effect of variants involving podocyte and non-collagenous extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in AS. Methods: We report a case series of eight patients with genetically proven AS and simultaneous variants involving podocyte and non-collagenous ECM proteins. Our aim is to describe the influence of such variants on the phenotype of patients with AS. Results: We identified 10 different type IV collagen variants. Patients were diagnosed with autosomal dominant (3/8), autosomal recessive (2/8), digenic (2/8) and X-linked AS (1/8). There were eight different variants involving podocyte and non-collagenous ECM proteins. The genes involved were CRB2, LAMA5, LAMB2, NUP107, MYO1E and PLCE1. Four patients (LAMB2, LAMA5 and PLCE1 variants) presented with nephrotic syndrome or nephrotic range proteinuria. Two patients had hearing loss. Most patients (7/8) had a family history of kidney disease. Two patients (LAMB2 and LAMA5 variants) were diagnosed with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Two patients developed end-stage kidney disease (LAMA5, MYO1E and NUP107 variants). Conclusions: Although mutations of podocyte and ECM proteins do not have phenotypic expression in monoallelic form, the presence of such variants could explain the phenotypic variability of AS.

Background: Molecular analysis in patients with nephrolithiasis (NL) and/or nephrocalcinosis (NC) enables an accurate evaluation. The existing clinical evidence regarding genetic testing in adults with NL is comprised of only a few cohort studies. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 49 adult patients diagnosed with NL and/or NC from a single center, on whom we performed a genetic test using a nephrolithiasis panel. We reviewed the phenotype of the patients and compared the cases with positive and negative molecular diagnosis. Results: 49 adult patients with NL and/or NC underwent genetic testing. Of the tested patients, 29 (59.2%) patients had 24 abnormal variants in 14 genes. Mendelian diseases were diagnosed in 14 (28.6%) cases: cystinuria (SLC3A1, SLC7A9; n=4), hereditary distal renal tubular acidosis (SLC4A1; n=3), Dent disease (CLCN5; n=2), familial hypomagnesaemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis (CLDN16; n=1), infantile hypercalcemia type 1 (CYP24A1; n=1), primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (AGXT; n=1), Bartter syndrome type 2 (KCNJ1; n=1) and autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (UMOD; n=1); 8 (16.3%) patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic monoallelic variants as predisposing factors for NL and/or NC, and 7 (14.3%) had biallelic or monoallelic variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Patients with positive genetic tests had a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (p=0.03), had more frequently NL associated with NC (p=0.007), and were unlikely to have arterial hypertension (p=0.03) when compared with patients with negative test. Conclusions: Our study shows an increased effectiveness of molecular diagnosis and highlights the benefits of genetic testing. NL associated with NC and the presence of chronic kidney disease are the characteristics that should prompt the clinician to suspect an inherited form of NL and/or NC.