The ground vibration caused by rock blasting is an extremely hazardous outcome of the blasting operation. Blasting activity has detrimental effects on both the ecology and the human population living in proximity to the area. Evaluating the magnitude of blasting vibrations requires careful evaluation of the peak particle velocity (PPV) as a fundamental and essential parameter for quantifying vibration velocity. Therefore, this study employs models using the relevance vector machine (RVM) approach for predicting the PPV resulting from quarry blasting. This investigation utilized the conventional and optimized RVM models for the first time in ground vibration prediction. This work compares thirty-three RVM models to choose the most efficient performance model. The following conclusions have been mapped from the outcomes of the several analyses. The performance evaluation of each RVM model demonstrates each model achieved a performance of more than 0.85 during the testing phase, there was a strong correlation observed between the actual ground vibrations and the predicted ones. The analysis of performance metrics (RMSE = 21.2999 mm/s, 16.2272 mm/s, R = 0.9175, PI = 1.59, IOA = 0.8239, IOS = 0.2541), score analysis (= 93), REC curve (= 6.85E−03, close to the actual, i.e., 0), curve fitting (= 1.05 close to best fit, i.e., 1), AD test (= 11.607 close to the actual, i.e., 9.790), Wilcoxon test (= 95%), Uncertainty analysis (WCB = 0.0134), and computational cost (= 0.0180) demonstrate that PSO_DRVM model MD29 outperformed better than other RVM models in the testing phase. This study will help mining and civil engineers and blasting experts to select the best kernel function and its hyperparameters in estimating ground vibration during rock blasting project. In the context of the mining and civil industry, the application of this study offers significant potential for enhancing safety protocols and optimizing operational efficiency.

Rock blasting is one of the most common and cost-effective excavation techniques. However, rock blasting has various negative environmental effects, such as air overpressure, fly rock, and ground vibration. Ground vibration is the most hazardous of these inevitable impacts since it has a negative impact not only on the environment of the surrounding area but also on the human population and the rock itself. The PPV is the most critical base parameter practice for understanding, evaluating, and predicting ground vibration in terms of vibration velocity. This study aims to predict the blast-induced ground vibration of the Mikurahana quarry, using Bayesian neural network (BNN) and four machine learning techniques, namely, gradient boosting, k-neighbors, decision tree, and random forest. The proposed models were developed using eight input parameters, one output, and one hundred blasting datasets. The assessment of the suitability of one model in comparison to the others was conducted by using different performance evaluation metrics, such as R, RMSE, and MSE. Hence, this study compared the performances of the BNN model with four machine learning regression analyses, and found that the result from the BNN was superior, with a lower error: R = 0.94, RMSE = 0.17, and MSE = 0.03. Finally, after the evaluation of the models, SHAP was performed to describe the importance of the models’ features and to avoid the black box issue.

The optimization of blasting operations greatly benefits from the prediction of rock fragmentation. The main factors that affect fragmentation are rock mass characteristics, blast geometry, and explosive properties. This paper is a step towards the implementation of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for predicting the extent of fragmentation (in percentage) in open pit mining. While various parameters can affect rock fragmentation, this study considers ten among them (i.e., spacing, drill hole diameter, burden, average bench height, powder factor, number of holes, charge per delay, uniaxial compressive strength, specific drilling, and stemming) to train and test the models. However, due to a weak correlation with rock fragmentation, drill diameter, average bench height, compressive strength, stemming, and charge per delay are eliminated to reduce model complexity. A total of 219 data sets having five input features including the number of holes, spacing, burden, specific drilling, and powder factor are used to develop the models. Machine learning models (random forest regression, support vector regression, and XG boost), as well as a deep learning model (neural network regression), are applied to develop a practical way that can optimize the prediction of fragmentation. This study employs performance measures such as R-squared, RMSE, MSE, MAPE, and MAE. The optimization of the model revealed promising results, indicating that the architecture 5-64-32-16-1 exhibits strong performance. Specifically, the model achieved mean squared error (MSE) values of 41.32 and 28.59 on the training and test datasets, respectively. The R² value for both training and test is 0.83. RFR is also performing well compared to SVR and XG boost with MSE values of 12.37 and 9.89 on training and testing data, respectively.in both sets, the R² value is 94%. Based on permutation importance and shapely plot values, it is observed that the powder factor has the highest impact, while the burden has the lowest impact on fragmentation.

Ground vibration is one of the most hazardous outcomes of blasting. It has a negative impact both on the environment and the human population near to the blasting area. To evaluate the magnitude of blasting vibrations, it is important to consider PPV as a fundamental critical base parameter practice in terms of vibration velocity. This study aims to explore the application of different soft computing techniques, including a Gaussian process regression (GPR), decision tree (DT), and support vector regression (SVR), for the prediction of blast-induced ground vibration (PPV) in quarry mining. The three models were evaluated using classical mathematical evaluation metrics (R², RMSE, MSE, MAE). The result shows that the GPR model achieves an excellent prediction result; with R² = 0.94, RMSE = 0.0384, MSE = 0.0014, and MAE = 0.0265, it shows high accuracy in predicting PPV. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) results emphasize the importance of understanding the interactions between the various factors and their effects on the vibration assessment. The findings can inform the development of more sustainable and environmentally friendly models for predicting blasting vibrations. Using a GPR to simulate and predict blasting-induced ground vibrations is the study’s main contribution. The GPR can capture complicated, non-linear correlations in data, making it ideal for blast-induced ground vibrations, which are dynamic and nonlinear. By using a Gaussian process regression, we can help companies and researchers improve the safety and efficiency in blast-induced ground vibration environments.

Mineral grade estimation is a vital phase in mine planning and design, as well as in the mining project’s economic assessment. In mining, commonly accepted methods of ore grade estimation include geometrical approaches and geostatistical techniques such as kriging, which effectively capture the spatial grade variation within a deposit. The application of machine-learning (ML) techniques has been explored in the estimation of mineral resources, where complex correlations need to be captured. In this paper, the authors developed four machine-learning regression models, i.e., support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), k-nearest neighbour (KNN) regression, and extreme gradient boost (XGBoost) regression, using a geological database to predict the grade in an Indian iron ore deposit. When compared with ordinary kriging (R² = 0.74; RMSE = 2.09), the RFR (R² = 0.74; RMSE = 2.06), XGBoost (R² = 0.73; RMSE = 2.12), and KNN (R² = 0.73; RMSE = 2.11) regression models produced similar results. The block model predictions generated using the RFR, XGBoost, and KNN models show comparable accuracy and spatial trends to those of ordinary kriging, whereas SVR was identified as less effective. When integrated with geological methods, these models demonstrate significant potential for enhancing and optimizing mine planning and design processes in similar iron ore deposits.