Personal health records (PHR) systems are designed to ensure that individuals have access and control over their health information and to support them in being active participants rather than passive ones in their healthcare process. Yet, PHR systems have not yet been widely adopted or used by consumers despite their benefits. For these advantages to be realized, adoption of the system is necessary. In this study, we examined how self-determination of health management influences individuals’ intention to implement a PHR system, i.e., their ability to actively manage their health. Using an extended technology acceptance model (TAM), the researchers developed and empirically tested a model explaining public adoption of PHRs. In total, 389 Saudi Arabian respondents were surveyed in a quantitative cross-sectional design. The hypotheses were analysed using structural equation modelling–partial least squares (SEM-PLS4). Results indicate that PHR system usage was influenced by three major factors: perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), and security towards intention to use. PHR PEOU and PHR intention to use were also found to be moderated by privacy, whereas usability positively moderated PHR PEOU and PHR intention to use and negatively moderated PHR PU and PHR intention to use. For the first time, this study examined the use of personal health records in Saudi Arabia, including the extension of the TAM model as well as development of a context-driven model that examines the relationship between privacy, security, usability, and the use of PHRs. Furthermore, this study fills a gap in the literature regarding the moderating effects of privacy influence on PEOU and intention to use. Further, the moderating effects of usability on the relationship between PEOU, PU, and intention to use. Study findings are expected to assist government agencies, health policymakers, and health organizations around the world, including Saudi Arabia, in understanding the adoption of personal health records.

The pandemic’s context is rife with numerous dangerous threats and high fear levels, influencing human decision-making. Such characteristics are identified by investigating the acceptance of exposure detection apps from the technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. This study purposed a model to investigate protection technology acceptance, specifically exposure detection apps in the context of COVID-19. Quantitative study approach and a cross-section design targeted 586 participants from Saudi Arabia. As the study model is complex, the study hypotheses were analysed using the structural equation modelling–partial least squares (SEM-PLS3) approach. The findings support the entire model hypothesis except the link between social media awareness and exposure detection apps’ intention. Mediation of COVID-19 anxiety and influence was confirmed as well. The current paper contributes to the technologies acceptance domain by developing a context-driven model comprising the major pandemic characteristics that lead to various patterns of technology acceptance. This study also fills the literature gap regarding mediating effects of social influence and COVID-19 anxiety in the relationship between trust in government and exposure detection apps implementation, and between COVID-19 anxiety and exposure detection apps implementation, respectively. The results may assist government agencies, health policymakers, and health organisations in the wide world and specifically Saudi Arabia, in their attempts to contain the COVID-19 pandemic spread.

Objective: The emergence of more contagious SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as EG.5 (Eris), has heightened the urgency of assessing associated risks and managing the spread of infections. Digital Contact Tracing (DCT) tools have been widely adopted to mitigate these risks, although the factors driving their acceptance are complex and multifaceted. However, there is a significant lack of research on the application of DCT within Saudi Arabia, despite its proactive use of such technologies in public health strategies. This study investigates the key determinants of DCT adoption and acceptance by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with psychological, social, and regulatory factors related to the context of the study. Methods: Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were collected from Saudi participants through an online survey and analysed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS4. Results: The results supported all the hypotheses except for the relationship between social media awareness and DCT tool usage. The findings revealed that COVID-19-induced anxiety significantly influenced technology acceptance, with social influence playing a mediating role. This study introduces a novel, context-specific model contributing to the technology acceptance field by exploring how pandemic-related factors, such as anxiety and social influence, affect DCT tool adoption. It also addresses a critical gap in the previous literature by examining the mediating role of social impact in the association between privacy and event-related fear and the moderating effect of COVID-19 anxiety on social media awareness and DCT usage. The findings offer valuable insights for governmental interventions, health institutions, and legislators in managing pandemics globally and within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Conclusion: We introduce a novel, context-specific model for understanding how pandemic-related psychological and social factors influence DCT adoption in this study. Those results provide insight into how policymakers, health institutions, and legislators can use DCT tools to manage pandemics globally and in Saudi Arabia.

Musculoskeletal pain and disorders (MSDs) constitute a well-recognised occupational hazard to the dental community. Fortunately, they are preventable. Dental office ergonomics plays a key role in addressing these musculoskeletal challenges. An ergonomic improvement project based on Kotter’s eight-step change model management theory was implemented within a dental practice. The project provided valuable evidence-based ergonomic interventions to prevent or reduce MSDs. The task force motivated staff to engage in strategies and interventions to enact an ergonomic vision. This case study represents an action plan to guide this ergonomic change. The key results of this project were an evidence-based ergonomics health promotional brochure, reduced sick leave attributable to MSDs, and workplace ergonomic checkpoints. The ergonomic change model represents an ongoing process where innovative trends and evaluative methods can be supported. Research limitations and practical implications were acknowledged.

Purpose: This study focuses on the concept of medical tourism, its significance, and its implications for the Jordanian health sector. Patients travel to Jordan to seek elective, less expensive medical procedures while having a vacation. Other factors that promote medical tourism include better quality of care, shorter queues, exotic locations, and culture. The Medical Liability Law passed not long ago, further encouraged more patients to seek treatment in Jordan. Medical tourism's contribution to Jordanian GDP is noteworthy; providing economic growth and employment opportunities. Though medical tourism received great recognition, little is said about specific concerns like the brain drain of health workers and incurring high costs on Jordanian citizens. This issue needs further attention. Design/methodology/approach: This research employed qualitative analysis by conducting semi-structured, in-person interviews with ten Jordanian professionals who have an interest in the field of medical tourism. The interviewees included a health marketer, private hospital directors, a health policymaker, a health accreditation expert, a quality assurance manager, and health care professionals. The key participants responded to the same open-ended interview questions. The selected participants represent a diversity of facilitators involved in the medical tourism industry. Interviews were transcribed and correlated with the literature. Findings: The competitive edge of Jordan in medical tourism arises from cost-effective health services, its renowned reputation in healthcare, and the diversity of touristic attractions. Most foreign patients that come to Jordan are from Arab countries. Jordan offers no language barrier and similar culture. The importance of medical tourism to Jordan is reflected in its contribution to the GDP by 3.5 percent or $1 billion. Little attention is drawn to some issues such as brain drain, high-incurring costs, promotional campaigns, medical inequality, and other pitfalls. Practical implications: Health policymakers and health services providers around the globe with similar health systems have expressed interest in facilitating the growth of the medical tourism industry. They should encourage what reduces operational and medical risks that may accompany the medical tourism industry. This paper could provide a better understanding of medical tourism in Jordan as a hot spot in the world for medical tourism. Social implications: Medical tourism can drive a robust social multiplier effect on a nation in terms of enhancing employment generation as well as fostering a culture of innovation and advancement in the field of healthcare and medicine. Originality/value: The interviews and other secondary data sources help shed some insight into the current status and ramifications of medical tourism in Jordan.

Background: Appraising patient expectations and misinterpretations about dental implants affects the overall treatment experience and aftermath. This study highlights perceptions of paramount importance in implant success. Purpose: This cross-sectional study aims to acquire the public’s primary perceptions about dental implant therapy. Materials and Methods: A 10-item questionnaire was circulated to a random community group of 454 participants who visited dental clinics in Northern Jordan. The questionnaire covered sociodemographic parameters and perceptions items. Data were analyzed and statistical tests were computed. Results: The survey revealed several key misconceptions about dental implants, many of which vary based on demographics, such as education, age, gender, and income. Around half of the respondents believed implants could not be placed immediately after tooth extraction, reflecting a lack of awareness about modern dental techniques, such as immediate implant placement. Eight percent of the participants, especially the lower education bracket, thought only individuals who had lost all their teeth could receive implants. This indicates a misunderstanding of the broad applications of dental implants, which can be used to replace individual teeth, not just full arches. About 23% viewed implant treatment as risky, painful, and associated with prolonged recovery times. About 33.3% had a belief that implants impose dietary restrictions. This belief was more likely pronounced among men and the younger public. Six percent agree that implants are less durable than other treatment options. In addition, 23% thought implants do not require special aftercare and 5.3%, especially the younger respondents, underestimated the qualifications necessary for performing the procedure. Around 3%, particularly the seniors and middle-aged adults viewed implants as functionally poor and not cost-effective. Conclusion: Though a relatively fair level of awareness about dental implants exists among most of the subjects in this study, some assume various unrealistic perceptions that are devoid of evidence-based and impartial information.