MANESH KUMAR

Dr. MANESH KUMAR


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 May 2015 in Veterinary World
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAmruta Amruta
Amruta Amruta
TBT. Balasaravanan
T. Balasaravanan
SMS. V. S Malik
S. V. S Malik
VMVysakh Mohan
Vysakh Mohan
MKMANESH KUMAR
MANESH KUMAR
DRDeepak B. Rawool
Deepak B. Rawool
This study was carried out to determine the prevalence, distribution, and identification of Salmonella serotypes in diarrheagenic infants and young animals, including sewage waste and fresh vegetables. A total of 550 samples were processed for the isolation of Salmonella spp., using standard microbiological and biochemical tests. Further polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Salmonella genus was carried out using self-designed primers targeting invA gene and thereafter identification of important serotypes namely Salmonella Enterica serovar Typhimurium, Salmonella Enterica serovar Enteritidis, Salmonella Enterica serovar Typhi was performed using published standardized multiplex PCR. An overall low prevalence of 2.5% (14/550) was observed. The observed prevalence of Salmonella spp. in diarrheagenic infants was 1.2% (05/400), diarrheagenic young animals 4% (02/50), sewage waste 10% (05/50), and fresh vegetables 4% (02/50), respectively. In diarrheagenic infants, of the five Salmonella isolates identified, two were Salmonella Typhimurium, two Salmonella Enteritidis, and one was unidentified and hence designated as other Salmonella serovar. All the Salmonella isolates identified from diarrheagenic young animals and sewage waste belonged to other Salmonella serovar, whereas, of the two isolates recovered from fresh vegetables, one was identified as other Salmonella serovar, and one as Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively. Isolation of Salmonella spp. especially from sewage waste and fresh vegetable is a matter of great concern from public health point of view because these sources can accidentally serve as a potential vehicle for transmission of Salmonella spp. to animals and human beings.

22 September 2022 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKushal Grakh
Kushal Grakh
DMDinesh Mittal
Dinesh Mittal
TKTarun Kumar
Tarun Kumar
STSwati Thakur
Swati Thakur
DPDiksha Panwar
Diksha Panwar
NJNaresh Jindal
Naresh Jindal
The indiscriminate usage and overuse of antimicrobials in pets or companion animals are underlying causes of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Despite the multi-faceted global challenge presented by antimicrobial resistance, very few studies have appraised pet practitioners’ factors, such as written policy on antimicrobials, dose rate prescribed, use of critically important antimicrobials, and antimicrobial prescription in clean surgical procedures, which can contribute to AMR. In the present study, an online cross-sectional survey among randomly selected pet practitioners (n = 104) of various Indian provinces and union territories was conducted using a questionnaire comprising 33 closed-ended questions on different parameters, viz., the dosage regimen and level of compliance towards guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO), other relevant veterinary associations, and their opinion while prescribing antimicrobials. Almost every practitioner of the 104 respondents had revealed the difficulties with owner compliance; i.e., incomplete course of the antibiotics, inappropriate follow-ups, and improper care of the sick animals. The majority of practitioners (95%) reported self-prescription of antimicrobials by the owner before presenting the pet(s) to the veterinary clinic, whereas more than half of the respondents (64%) revealed unavailability of antibiogram facilities. Furthermore, a large number (76%) of practitioners stated empirical treatment based on their experience as the main criteria for antimicrobial choice in the absence of timely results from the laboratory. Although non-necessitated use of antimicrobials in clean surgical procedures has been claimed, surprisingly, the majority of pet practitioners (97%) reported their use to reduce the post-operative complications. The use of the highest priority, critically important antimicrobials (HPCIA) listed by the WHO for humans, particularly quinolones and third-generation cephalosporin, also has been reported for different infections. The treatment durations were nearly as per the recommended guidelines issued by the Danish Small Animal Veterinary Association (DSAVA) for different ailments. Analysis using chi-square tests exhibited a significant correlation between less experienced veterinarians (less than 5 years) and prescription of antimicrobials restricted for critically important infections in human medicine. However, there seems to be no association between the experience of the practitioner and the further studied parameters, namely, antimicrobial regimen prescription, weighing the animals before prescription, dose rate calculation, and antimicrobial selection and use after clean surgical operations. The findings suggest periodic awareness campaigns among practitioners regarding the implementation of the official guidelines, the need for systematic surveillance of AMR, awareness among pet owners about antimicrobial resistance, and the importance of rational use of antimicrobials on their pets.
1

10 April 2025 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDinesh Mittal
Dinesh Mittal
KGKushal Grakh
Kushal Grakh
MKMANESH KUMAR
MANESH KUMAR
PJPunit Jhandai
Punit Jhandai
SDSwati Dahiya
Swati Dahiya
NJNaresh Jindal
Naresh Jindal
Brucellosis, a contagious reproductive disease of livestock, has a significant economic impact in terms of abortions and stillbirths and has zoonotic importance. A study was conducted to estimate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in a bovine population in Haryana state, India. This study was carried out on 4325 bovine serum samples (Cattle: 2151, Buffalo: 2174) using the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (i-ELISA). The seroprevalence, estimated individually by the RBPT and i-ELISA, was found to be 6.86% (95% CI: 6.11–7.62) and 6.05% (95% CI: 5.34–6.76), respectively. In total, 258 out of 4325 (5.96%; 95% CI: 5.25–6.67) samples were found to be positive by both assays. The prevalence was found to be significantly higher in the cattle population (7.58%) as compared to buffalo (4.37%) (Chi-square = 19, p < 0.001). Seroprevalence was highest in the agroclimatic zone I (8.73%), followed by zone II (7.33%) and zone III (1.45%) (Chi-square = 76.27, p < 0.001).