Peter Baumann

Prof. Dr. Peter Baumann

computer science and electrical engineering, Constructor University, Bremen, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2015 in International Journal of Digital Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Peter BaumannPeter Baumann
Peter Baumann
PMPaolo Mazzetti
Paolo Mazzetti
JUJoachim Ungar
Joachim Ungar
RBRoberto Barbera
Roberto Barbera
DBDamiano Barboni
Damiano Barboni
SWSebastian Wagner
Sebastian Wagner
Big Data Analytics is an emerging field since massive storage and computing capabilities have been made available by advanced e-infrastructures. Earth and Environmental sciences are likely to benefit from Big Data Analytics techniques supporting the processing of the large number of Earth Observation datasets currently acquired and generated through observations and simulations. However, Earth Science data and applications present specificities in terms of relevance of the geospatial information, wide heterogeneity of data models and formats, and complexity of processing. Therefore, Big Earth Data Analytics requires specifically tailored techniques and tools. The EarthServer Big Earth Data Analytics engine offers a solution for coverage-type datasets, built around a high performance array database technology, and the adoption and enhancement of standards for service interaction (OGC WCS and WCPS). The EarthServer solution, led by the collection of requirements from scientific communities and international initiatives, provides a holistic approach that ranges from query languages and scalability up to mobile access and visualization. The result is demonstrated and validated through the development of lighthouse applications in the Marine, Geology, Atmospheric, Planetary and Cryospheric science domains.

15 July 2009 in GeoInformatica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Peter BaumannPeter Baumann
Peter Baumann

1 October 1994 in The VLDB Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Peter BaumannPeter Baumann
Peter Baumann

14 June 2015 in Earth Science Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PYPeng Yue
Peng Yue
Peter BaumannPeter Baumann
Peter Baumann
KBKaylin Bugbee
Kaylin Bugbee
LJLiangcun Jiang
Liangcun Jiang

2 February 2021 in Journal of Big Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Peter BaumannPeter Baumann
Peter Baumann
DMDimitar Misev
Dimitar Misev
VMVlad Merticariu
Vlad Merticariu
BHBang Pham Huu
Bang Pham Huu
Multi-dimensional arrays (also known as raster data or gridded data) play a key role in many, if not all science and engineering domains where they typically represent spatio-temporal sensor, image, simulation output, or statistics “datacubes”. As classic database technology does not support arrays adequately, such data today are maintained mostly in silo solutions, with architectures that tend to erode and not keep up with the increasing requirements on performance and service quality. Array Database systems attempt to close this gap by providing declarative query support for flexible ad-hoc analytics on large n-D arrays, similar to what SQL offers on set-oriented data, XQuery on hierarchical data, and SPARQL and CIPHER on graph data. Today, Petascale Array Database installations exist, employing massive parallelism and distributed processing. Hence, questions arise about technology and standards available, usability, and overall maturity. Several papers have compared models and formalisms, and benchmarks have been undertaken as well, typically comparing two systems against each other. While each of these represent valuable research to the best of our knowledge there is no comprehensive survey combining model, query language, architecture, and practical usability, and performance aspects. The size of this comparison differentiates our study as well with 19 systems compared, four benchmarked to an extent and depth clearly exceeding previous papers in the field; for example, subsetting tests were designed in a way that systems cannot be tuned to specifically these queries. It is hoped that this gives a representative overview to all who want to immerse into the field as well as a clear guidance to those who need to choose the best suited datacube tool for their application. This article presents results of the Research Data Alliance (RDA) Array Database Assessment Working Group (ADA:WG), a subgroup of the Big Data Interest Group. It has elicited the state of the art in Array Databases, technically supported by IEEE GRSS and CODATA Germany, to answer the question: how can data scientists and engineers benefit from Array Database technology? As it turns out, Array Databases can offer significant advantages in terms of flexibility, functionality, extensibility, as well as performance and scalability—in total, the database approach of offering “datacubes” analysis-ready heralds a new level of service quality. Investigation shows that there is a lively ecosystem of technology with increasing uptake, and proven array analytics standards are in place. Consequently, such approaches have to be considered a serious option for datacube services in science, engineering and beyond. Tools, though, vary greatly in functionality and performance as it turns out.