Mahesh Padukudru Anand

Dr. Mahesh Padukudru Anand

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2022 in ERJ Open Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSheetu Singh
Sheetu Singh
SSSundeep Salvi
Sundeep Salvi
DMDaya Krishan Mangal
Daya Krishan Mangal
MSMeenu Singh
Meenu Singh
SAShally Awasthi
Shally Awasthi
VSVirendra Singh
Virendra Singh
Objective: The objective of this subanalysis of data from centres across urban areas in India of the Global Asthma Network (GAN) was to study 1) the prevalence of symptoms of asthma in children and adults, 2) the change in prevalence of asthma and its trigger factors since the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC), and 3) current asthma treatment practice.Methods: In this cross-sectional, multicentre, school-based and self-administered questionnaire, responses from children aged 6–7 years and 13–14 years, and their respective parents, were analysed.Results: The GAN Phase I study included 20 084 children in the 6–7-year age group, 25 887 children in the 13–14-year age group and 81 296 parents. The prevalence of wheeze in the previous 12 months was 3.16%, 3.63% and 3.30% in the three groups, respectively. In comparison to the ISAAC studies, there was a significant reduction in the prevalence of current wheeze (p<0.001). Bivariate analysis revealed a significant reduction in the prevalence of trigger factors. Almost 82% of current wheezers and 70% of subjects with symptoms of severe asthma were not clinically diagnosed as having asthma. The daily use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) was less than 2.5% in subjects with current wheeze and those with symptoms of severe asthma but less than 1% used daily ICS when asthma remained undiagnosed.Conclusion: The prevalence of current wheeze and its causal factors showed a significant reduction compared to previous ISAAC studies. Among subjects with current wheeze and symptoms of severe asthma, the problem of under-diagnosis and under-treatment was widespread.

6 April 2016 in Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mahesh Padukudru AnandMahesh Padukudru Anand
Mahesh Padukudru Anand
GWGary W. K. Wong
Gary W. K. Wong
LOLudmila Ogorodova
Ludmila Ogorodova
JPJames Potts
James Potts
TLTing Fan Leung
Ting Fan Leung
PBP. Burney
P. Burney
Background: Data are lacking regarding the prevalence of food sensitization and probable food allergy among general population in India. We report the prevalence of sensitization and probable food allergy to 24 common foods among adults from general population in Karnataka, South India.Methodology: The study was conducted in two stages: a screening study and a case–control study. A total of 11 791 adults in age group 20–54 were randomly sampled from general population in South India and answered a screening questionnaire. A total of 588 subjects (236 cases and 352 controls) participated in the case–control study involving a detailed questionnaire and specific IgE estimation for 24 common foods.Results: A high level of sensitization (26.5%) was observed for most of the foods in the general population, higher than that observed among adults in Europe, except for those foods that cross‐react with birch pollen. Most of the sensitization was observed in subjects who had total IgE above the median IgE level. A high level of cross‐reactivity was observed among different pollens and foods and among foods. The prevalence of probable food allergy (self‐reports of adverse symptoms after the consumption of food and specific IgE to the same food) was 1.2%, which was mainly accounted for cow's milk (0.5%) and apple (0.5%).Conclusion: Very high levels of sensitization were observed for most foods, including those not commonly consumed in the general population. For the levels of sensitization, the prevalence of probable food allergy was low. This disassociation needs to be further explored in future studies.

13 October 2022 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRaja Dhar
Raja Dhar
SSSheetu Singh
Sheetu Singh
DTDeepak Talwar
Deepak Talwar
BMB.V. Murali Mohan
B.V. Murali Mohan
STSurya Kant Tripathi
Surya Kant Tripathi
JCJames D. Chalmers
James D. Chalmers
Background: Identifying risk factors for poor outcomes can help with risk stratification and targeting of treatment. Risk factors for mortality and exacerbations have been identified in bronchiectasis but have been almost exclusively studied in European and North American populations. This study investigated the risk factors for poor outcome in a large population of bronchiectasis patients enrolled in India.Methods: The European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) and Respiratory Research Network of India (EMBARC-India) registry is a prospective observational study of adults with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis enrolled at 31 sites across India. Baseline characteristics of patients were used to investigate associations with key clinical outcomes: mortality, severe exacerbations requiring hospital admission, overall exacerbation frequency and decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s.Results: 1018 patients with at least 12-month follow-up data were enrolled in the follow-up study. Frequent exacerbations (≥3 per year) at baseline were associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 3.23, 95% CI 1.39–7.50), severe exacerbations (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.92–3.83), future exacerbations (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3.08, 95% CI 2.36–4.01) and lung function decline. Coexisting COPD, dyspnoea and current cigarette smoking were similarly associated with a worse outcome across all end-points studied. Additional predictors of mortality and severe exacerbations were increasing age and cardiovascular comorbidity. Infection with Gram-negative pathogens (predominantlyKlebsiella pneumoniae) was independently associated with increased mortality (HR 3.13, 95% CI 1.62–6.06), whilePseudomonas aeruginosainfection was associated with severe exacerbations (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.97) and overall exacerbation rate (IRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13–1.91).Conclusions: This study identifies risk factors for morbidity and mortality among bronchiectasis patients in India. Identification of these risk factors may support treatment approaches optimised to an Asian setting.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMahendra M
Mahendra M
ANAbhishek Nuchin
Abhishek Nuchin
RKRanjith Kumar
Ranjith Kumar
SSShreedhar S
Shreedhar S
Mahesh Padukudru AnandMahesh Padukudru Anand
Mahesh Padukudru Anand
Introduction: The novel coronavirus pandemic has caused significant mortality throughout the world. This study was done as there is scarce data on mortality predictors in severe COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to ICU in the Indian population. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to tertiary care center during June–October 2020. The records of patients admitted to ICU were collected and data included demography, symptoms, comorbidites and vital parameters. Laboratory parameters included complete hemogram, random blood sugar, S.Ferritin, S.LDH, renal function test, liver function test. Treatment-associated information such as the use of remdesivir, timing of initiating rem-desivir after the symptom onset, the use of steroids, use of anticoagulants, use of HFNC, NIV, ventilator were collected. 30 days mortality data post-discharge was collected via telephonic interview. Results: 4,012 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were admitted to hospital, of which 560 (13.95%) with severe pneumonia were included in the study. Mean age was 57.75 ± 13.96 years. The mortality rates were 54.64% among severe COVID-19 cases and 5% among mild to moderate COVID-19 cases. The Cox multinominal regression analysis identified SpO2/FiO2 < 400, age > 50 years, duration of symptom > 4 days, serum ferritin > 450 µg/L, respiratory rate > 23/min, the presence of comorbidities and non-usage of remdesivir were independently associated with increased mortality. Mortality rate at 30 days was 56.60%. Conclusion: Severe COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with very high mortality, especially in a resource-constrained setting. The use of remdesivir may have to be considered early in the course of disease to prevent excess mortality related to COVID-19.

1 April 2021 in Toxics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSshyam prasad bellipady shetty
shyam prasad bellipady shetty
SCSindaghatta Krishnarao Chaya
Sindaghatta Krishnarao Chaya
SVSravan Kumar V
Sravan Kumar V
MMMaheswarappa Mahendra
Maheswarappa Mahendra
JSJayaraju Biligere Siddaiah
Jayaraju Biligere Siddaiah
Mahesh Padukudru AnandMahesh Padukudru Anand
Mahesh Padukudru Anand
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, is characterized by abnormal activation of inflammatory cells. The increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), further amplify the inflammation. We evaluated the dose response relationship of IL-1β and TNF-α levels and severity of airflow limitation, and differential responses in IL-1β and TNF-α between biomass COPD (BMS-COPD) and tobacco smoke COPD (TS-COPD) using a case control design in 160 subjects. Patients with COPD had higher serum levels of both IL-1β and TNF-α compared to healthy controls. A large difference in TNF-α was observed between TS-COPD and BMS-COPD, where TS-COPD patients had much higher levels. Serum IL-1β levels were higher in BMS-COPD. Levels of IL-1β correlated better with severity of airflow limitation than TNF-α levels. Both TNF-α and IL-1β levels had a negative linear relationship with Forced Expiratory Volume in 1st second (FEV1) and six-minute walk distance. The correlations were stronger with FEV1 than six-minute walk distance. The correlations of TNF-α and IL-1β with St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores and body mass index (BMI) were not significant. In conclusion, the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β are differently elevated in TS-COPD and BMS-COPD, respectively.

1 August 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAshwaghosha Parthasarathi
Ashwaghosha Parthasarathi
SPSunag Padukudru
Sunag Padukudru
SASumalata Arunachal
Sumalata Arunachal
CBChetak Kadabasal Basavaraj
Chetak Kadabasal Basavaraj
MKMamidipudi Thirumala Krishna
Mamidipudi Thirumala Krishna
Mahesh Padukudru AnandMahesh Padukudru Anand
Mahesh Padukudru Anand
Several studies have proposed that the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is one of the various biomarkers that can be useful in assessing COVID-19 disease-related outcomes. Our systematic review analyzes the relationship between on-admission NLR values and COVID-19 severity and mortality. Six different severity criteria were used. A search of the literature in various databases was conducted from 1 January 2020 to 1 May 2021. We calculated the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for the collected NLR values. A meta-regression analysis was performed, looking at the length of hospitalization and other probable confounders, such as age, gender, and comorbidities. A total of sixty-four studies were considered, which included a total of 15,683 patients. The meta-analysis showed an SMD of 3.12 (95% CI: 2.64–3.59) in NLR values between severe and non-severe patients. A difference of 3.93 (95% CI: 2.35–5.50) was found between survivors and non-survivors of the disease. Upon summary receiver operating characteristics analysis, NLR showed 80.2% (95% CI: 74.0–85.2%) sensitivity and 75.8% (95% CI: 71.3–79.9%) specificity for the prediction of severity and 78.8% (95% CI: 73.5–83.2%) sensitivity and 73.0% (95% CI: 68.4–77.1%) specificity for mortality, and was not influenced by age, gender, or co-morbid conditions. Conclusion: On admission, NLR predicts both severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients, and an NLR > 6.5 is associated with significantly greater the odds of mortality.