Dylan Gilbey

Dr. Dylan Gilbey


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 December 2020 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDylan Gilbey
Dylan Gilbey
HMHelen Morgan
Helen Morgan
ALAshleigh Lin
Ashleigh Lin
YPYael Perry
Yael Perry
Background: Young people (aged 12-25 years) with diverse sexuality, gender, or bodily characteristics, such as those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, or queer (LGBTIQ+), are at substantially greater risk of a range of mental, physical, and sexual health difficulties compared with their peers. Digital health interventions have been identified as a potential way to reduce these health disparities. Objective: This review aims to summarize the characteristics of existing evidence-based digital health interventions for LGBTIQ+ young people and to describe the evidence for their effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using internet databases and gray literature sources, and the results were screened for inclusion. The included studies were synthesized qualitatively. Results: The search identified 38 studies of 24 unique interventions seeking to address mental, physical, or sexual health–related concerns in LGBTIQ+ young people. Substantially more evidence-based interventions existed for gay and bisexual men than for any other population group, and there were more interventions related to risk reduction of sexually transmitted infections than to any other health concern. There was some evidence for the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of these interventions overall; however, the quality of evidence is often lacking. Conclusions: There is sufficient evidence to suggest that targeted digital health interventions are an important focus for future research aimed at addressing health difficulties in LGBTIQ+ young people. Additional digital health interventions are needed for a wider range of health difficulties, particularly in terms of mental and physical health concerns, as well as more targeted interventions for same gender–attracted women, trans and gender-diverse people, and people with intersex variations. Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020128164; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=128164

9 August 2019 in Adolescent Research Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDylan Gilbey
Dylan Gilbey
SMSimone Mahfouda
Simone Mahfouda
JOJeneva Lee Ohan
Jeneva Lee Ohan
ALAshleigh Lin
Ashleigh Lin
YPYael Perry
Yael Perry

23 August 2022 in Youth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDylan Gilbey
Dylan Gilbey
YPYael Perry
Yael Perry
ALAshleigh Lin
Ashleigh Lin
JOJeneva Lee Ohan
Jeneva Lee Ohan
Many adolescents with diverse sexual orientations lead happy and fulfilled lives. However, evidence consistently suggests elevated rates of mental health difficulties in this population relative to heterosexual peers, and internalization of stigma (i.e., self-stigma) is implicated in these elevated rates. This study aimed to understand and describe the lived experience of self-stigma with respect to participants’ sexual orientations. To do this, N = 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescents aged 14–18 who are attracted to the same gender, asking about how their stigma experiences affected their views of their sexual orientation, and themselves. A community reference group of young people with diverse sexual orientations was also consulted in the development of the study, and interpretation of the themes. Through thematic analysis of the self-stigma data and the consultation process, four themes were developed: (1) stigma is a precursor to self-stigma; (2) acceptance is a precursor to self-acceptance; (3) contents of self-stigma, characterized by two subthemes: (i) self-shame (comprised of feelings of abnormality, self-disgust and/or being a ‘bad’ person) and (ii) self-invalidation; and (4) self-stigma is painful and can be damaging. There is a contrast between the way that internalized homophobia is operationalized, and the way self-stigma was characterized in this study with young people, and conceptualizing and measuring self-stigma may need to be updated. Based on the analysis, we suggest four ways to address self-stigma and its impacts: (1) individual intervention; (2) increasing acceptance in families and communities; (3) providing respectful and normalizing sexuality education and information; and (4) overcoming community stigma.

1 May 2021 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMichael J. Kyron
Michael J. Kyron
PMPeter M. McEvoy
Peter M. McEvoy
DGDylan Gilbey
Dylan Gilbey
ALAshleigh Lin
Ashleigh Lin
CMCatherine Mazza
Catherine Mazza
DLDavid Lawrence
David Lawrence

12 May 2020 in JMIR Preprints
Verified
Preprint
Open access
DGDylan Gilbey
Dylan Gilbey
HMHelen Morgan
Helen Morgan
ALAshleigh Lin
Ashleigh Lin
YPYael Perry
Yael Perry
BACKGROUND Young people (aged 12-25 years) with diverse sexuality, gender, or bodily characteristics, such as those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, or queer (LGBTIQ+), are at substantially greater risk of a range of mental, physical, and sexual health difficulties compared with their peers. Digital health interventions have been identified as a potential way to reduce these health disparities. OBJECTIVE This review aims to summarize the characteristics of existing evidence-based digital health interventions for LGBTIQ+ young people and to describe the evidence for their effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using internet databases and gray literature sources, and the results were screened for inclusion. The included studies were synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS The search identified 38 studies of 24 unique interventions seeking to address mental, physical, or sexual health–related concerns in LGBTIQ+ young people. Substantially more evidence-based interventions existed for gay and bisexual men than for any other population group, and there were more interventions related to risk reduction of sexually transmitted infections than to any other health concern. There was some evidence for the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of these interventions overall; however, the quality of evidence is often lacking. CONCLUSIONS There is sufficient evidence to suggest that targeted digital health interventions are an important focus for future research aimed at addressing health difficulties in LGBTIQ+ young people. Additional digital health interventions are needed for a wider range of health difficulties, particularly in terms of mental and physical health concerns, as well as more targeted interventions for same gender–attracted women, trans and gender-diverse people, and people with intersex variations. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020128164; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=128164

28 May 2026 in Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MEMichael C. W. English
Michael C. W. English
APAlana Papageorgiou
Alana Papageorgiou
ZWZoe Waters
Zoe Waters
AFAmy Finlay-Jones
Amy Finlay-Jones
DGDylan Gilbey
Dylan Gilbey
ALAshleigh Lin
Ashleigh Lin