Sheng FANG

Dr. Sheng FANG

Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BNBaojie Nie
Baojie Nie
SFSheng FANG
Sheng FANG
MJMan Jiang
Man Jiang
LWLaishun Wang
Laishun Wang
MNMuyi Ni
Muyi Ni
FLFengchen Li
Fengchen Li

1 November 2019 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XLXinpeng Li
Xinpeng Li
SSSida Sun
Sida Sun
XHXiaofeng Hu
Xiaofeng Hu
HHHong Huang
Hong Huang
HLHong Li
Hong Li
SFSheng FANG
Sheng FANG

24 October 2018 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYousuke Sato
Yousuke Sato
MTMasayuki Takigawa
Masayuki Takigawa
TSThomas Tsuyoshi Sekiyama
Thomas Tsuyoshi Sekiyama
Mizuo KajinoMizuo Kajino
Mizuo Kajino
HTHiroaki Terada
Hiroaki Terada
TNTeruyuki Nakajima
Teruyuki Nakajima
A model intercomparison of the atmospheric dispersion of cesium‐137 (137Cs) emitted after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in Japan was conducted to understand the behavior of atmospheric 137Cs in greater detail. The same meteorological data with a fine spatiotemporal resolution and an emission inventory were applied to all models to exclude the differences among the models originating from differences in meteorological and emission data. The meteorological data were used for initial, boundary, and nudging data or offline meteorological field. Furthermore, a horizontal grid with the same resolution as that of the meteorological data was adopted for all models. This setup enabled us to focus on model variability originating from the processes included in each model, for example, physical processes. The multimodel ensemble captured 40% of the atmospheric 137Cs events observed by measurements, and the figure of merit in space for the total deposition of 137Cs exceeded 80. The lower score of the atmospheric 137Cs than that of the deposition originated from the difference in timing between observed and simulated atmospheric 137Cs. Our analyses indicated that meteorological data were most critical for reproducing the atmospheric 137Cs events. The results further revealed that differences in 137Cs concentrations among the models originated from deposition and diffusion processes when the meteorological field was simulated reasonably well. The models with small deposition fluxes produced higher scores for atmospheric 137Cs, and those with strong diffusion succeeded in capturing the high 137Cs concentrations observed; however, they also tended to overestimate the concentrations.

1 January 2022 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SFSheng FANG
Sheng FANG
SZShuhan Zhuang
Shuhan Zhuang
DGDaisuke Goto
Daisuke Goto
XHXiaofeng Hu
Xiaofeng Hu
LSLi Sheng
Li Sheng
SHShunxiang Huang
Shunxiang Huang
Wet deposition, including both in- and below-cloud scavenging, is critical for the atmospheric transport modeling of 137Cs following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant (FDNPP) accident. Although intensively investigated, wet deposition simulation is still subject to uncertainties of meteorological inputs and wet scavenging modeling, leading to biased 137Cs transport prediction. To reduce the dual uncertainties, in- and below-cloud wet scavenging schemes of 137Cs were simultaneously integrated into Weather Research and Forecasting-Chemistry (WRF-Chem), yielding online coupled modeling of meteorology and the two wet scavenging processes. The integration was performed using 25 combinations of different in- and below-cloud schemes, covering most schemes in the literature. Two microphysics schemes were also tested to better reproduce the precipitation. The 25 models and the ensemble mean of 9 representative models were systematically compared with the below-cloud-only WRF-Chem model, using the cumulative deposition and atmospheric concentrations of 137Cs measurements. The results reveal that, with the Morrison's double moment cloud microphysics scheme, the developed models could better reproduce the rainfall and substantially improve the cumulative deposition simulation. The in-cloud scheme is influential to the model behaviors and those schemes considering cloud parameters also improve the atmospheric concentration simulations, whereas the others solely dependent on the rain intensity are sensitive to meteorology. The ensemble mean achieves satisfactory performance except one plume event, but still outperforms most models.

1 September 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XSXiang Sun
Xiang Sun
ZPZhong-Ba Ping
Zhong-Ba Ping
ZDZhan-Feng Dong
Zhan-Feng Dong
KCKe-Liang Chen
Ke-Liang Chen
XZXiao-Dong Zhu
Xiao-Dong Zhu
WXWei Xiong
Wei Xiong

3 December 2022 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSheng FANG
Sheng FANG
XDXinwen Dong
Xinwen Dong
SZShuhan Zhuang
Shuhan Zhuang
ZTZhijie Tian
Zhijie Tian
YZYungang Zhao
Yungang Zhao
LSLi Sheng
Li Sheng