Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the mainstay treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Here, we used network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different agents across 41 studies (36 cohort studies and five RCTs) in 11,540 patients. Multiple RCTs and cohort studies were searched to evaluate TACE combined with different TKIs. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor response. NMA used a random-effects consistency model to pool evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed. Further, heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed and agents were ranked. TACE plus lenvatinib provided the maximal OS (Rank probability: 0.7559), PFS (Rank probability: 0.8595), CR (Rank probability: 0.4179), and DCR (Rank probability: 0.3857). TACE plus anlotinib demonstrated the highest PR (p = 0.62649) and ORR (p = 0.51158). SD was more often associated with TACE plus sorafenib (Rank probability: 0.601685). TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC based on the highest ranking of OS, PFS, and DCR rates. However, given the lack of statistically significant OS benefit, shared decision making should include other TKIs as acceptable alternatives.

Background and Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed (HAICROX) as an alternative treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are ineligible for, or failed, the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment. Materials and Methods: From July 2020 to November 2021, a total of 35 HCC patients were enrolled and received HAIC with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed. The overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. The tumor response was assessed by the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST), and the adverse events were investigated using the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0). Results: The median OS and TTP were 10 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.5–14.6) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.3–4.7), respectively. By means of multivariate analysis, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor for better survival. No patients experienced toxicity-related death. Thrombocytopenia, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation were the most common toxicities. No grade 3 or higher adverse events related to HAICROX were observed. Conclusion: HAICROX showed valuable efficacy and tolerable toxicity in advanced HCC patients who progressed on TACE or were ineligible for TACE. HAICROX is a promising treatment for advanced-stage HCC patients with TACE failure or ineligibility.

Background and Objectives: The recurrence outcome in patients who underwent microwave ablation (MWA) with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify the predictive factors of recurrence in these patients. Materials and Methods: From May 2018 to April 2021, 66 patients with HCC within Milan criteria were enrolled. Local tumor progression (LTP) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors of recurrence. The propensity score analysis was conducted to reduce potential confounding bias. Results: During the median follow-up of 25.07 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.85, 28.28), the median time to LTP and RFS were 20.10 (95%CI, 14.67, 25.53) and 13.03 (95%CI, 6.36, 19.70) months. No group difference (MWA vs. MWA + TACE) was found in 1-year cumulative LTP (p = 0.575) and RFS (p = 0.515), but meaningful significant differences were found in two-year recurrence (LTP, p = 0.007 and RFS, p = 0.037). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that treatment received before ablation was an independent risk factor of LTP (hazard ratio [HR] 4.37, 95%CI, 1.44, 13.32) and RFS (HR 3.41, 95%CI, 1.49, 7.81). Conclusions: The LTP and RFS in the MWA group were similar to that in the MWA combined with TACE. For HCC within Milan criteria, both groups preferentially selected MWA. More endeavor and rigorous surveillance should be taken to relapse prevention, in patients who have received previous treatment.

Objective: To investigate the clinical features and long-term prognosis of patients co-existing with ovarian endometrioma (OMA) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Methods: Totally 358 OMA patients were retrospectively analyzed, who had a minimum of 8 years follow-up after laparoscopic cystectomy, which was performed by one professional endometriosis surgery team at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2009 to April 2013. All women were divided into DIE group and non-DIE group, and analysis was performed in preoperative characteristics, surgical findings and postoperative outcomes during follow-up. Results: A total of 358 OMA patients were included, of which 190 patients (53.1%, 190/358) were in the DIE group, while other 168 patients (46.9%, 168/358) in the non-DIE group. The average ages between the two groups were (33.7±5.4), (32.5±5.3) years (P=0.047), the average parity was (0.4±0.6) times vs (0.3±0.5) times (P=0.079). There were significant differences in the proportions of moderate to severe dysmenorrhea [67.4% (128/190) vs 56.5% (95/168)], chronic pelvic pain [24.2% (46/190) vs 7.7% (13/168)], and the increase in CA₁₂₅ [79.9% (139/190) vs 65.2% (101/168)] between the two groups (all P<0.05). The average operation time in the DIE and non-DIE groups was (75±21) vs (39±36) minutes (P<0.01). There was a significant difference in adenomyosis presence between the two groups [41.6% (79/190) vs 22.0% (37/168); P=0.001]. All patients were followed up for at least 8 years. At the end of the follow-up, though the DIE group was with higher total rate of disease relapse, yet no significant difference was found between the two groups in statistical comparison [21.6% (41/190) vs 16.1% (27/168); P=0.185]. A total of 41 cases in the DIE group recurred, the recurrence rate of pain was 15.8% (30/190), and the recurrence rate of cyst was 8.4% (16/190); 27 cases had recurrence after operation in the non-DIE group, the recurrence rate of pain was 8.9% (15/168), and the recurrence rate of cyst was 10.7% (18/168). There were no significant differences in the pain recurrence rate (P=0.067) and cyst recurrence rate (P=0.460) between the two groups. As for the successfully pregnant patients, live birth rates were 100.0% (65/65) vs 94.4% (68/72) between DIE group and non-DIE groups (P=0.120). Conclusions: Compared with the non-DIE group, OMA patients with concurrent DIE might have severe pain symptoms, higher probability of abnormal CA₁₂₅ levels and more severe pelvic adhesions. Although there are no significant differences in the total recurrence rate and the recurrence rate of various types between the two groups, the proportion of pain recurrence in the DIE group is higher than that in the non-DIE group. In terms of fertility outcomes, patients in the DIE group are with lower likelihood of pregnancy after surgery during the long-time follow-up. DIE has no significant influence on the fertility outcome.

The baseline CRAFITY score, derived from AFP and C-reactive protein, is a validated prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving immunotherapy. However, whether its prognostic value can be improved by on-treatment reassessment remains unclear. We evaluated the two-cycle on-treatment CRAFITY score in 108 advanced-HCC patients who received immune-based combination therapy as first- or second-line treatment. The score was calculated at baseline and after two cycles. Kaplan–Meier, Cox regression, time-dependent ROC, landmark, and sensitivity analyses were performed. The two-cycle score significantly stratified overall survival (median OS from landmark: 34.6, 12.9, and 6.7 months for scores 0, 1, and 2; p < 0.0001) and remained independently associated with OS after adjustment for vascular invasion, treatment line, and concomitant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.70–3.29, p < 0.001). The baseline score showed only borderline associations (OS p = 0.07; PFS p = 0.09). The two-cycle score had an apparent AUC of 0.709 (95% CI 0.586–0.832) at 6 months and 0.745 (95% CI 0.658–0.832) at 12 months. The corresponding values for the baseline score were 0.645 and 0.638. Adding the two-cycle score to a clinical reference model increased the 12-month AUC from 0.699 to 0.811 (ΔAUC = 0.112). Bootstrap internal validation yielded an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.698 (95% CI 0.650–0.776). In conclusion, the two-cycle CRAFITY score provides complementary posttreatment prognostic information for early risk stratification, but prospective external validation is required before clinical application.