Lukas J. Volz

Dr. Lukas J. Volz

1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2014 in The Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNCharlotte Nettekoven
Charlotte Nettekoven
LVLukas J. Volz
Lukas J. Volz
MKMartha Kutscha
Martha Kutscha
EPEva-Maria Pool
Eva-Maria Pool
ARAnne K. Rehme
Anne K. Rehme
CGChristian Grefkes
Christian Grefkes
Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a specific protocol of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), induces changes in cortical excitability that last beyond stimulation. TBS-induced aftereffects, however, vary between subjects, and the mechanisms underlying these aftereffects to date remain poorly understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether increasing the number of pulses of intermittent TBS (iTBS) (1) increases cortical excitability as measured by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) alters functional connectivity measured using resting-state fMRI, in a dose-dependent manner. Sixteen healthy, human subjects received three serially applied iTBS blocks of 600 pulses over the primary motor cortex (M1 stimulation) and the parieto-occipital vertex (sham stimulation) to test for dose-dependent iTBS effects on cortical excitability and functional connectivity (four sessions in total). iTBS over M1 increased MEP amplitudes compared with sham stimulation after each stimulation block. Although the increase in MEP amplitudes did not differ between the first and second block of M1 stimulation, we observed a significant increase after three blocks (1800 pulses). Furthermore, iTBS enhanced resting-state functional connectivity between the stimulated M1 and premotor regions in both hemispheres. Functional connectivity between M1 and ipsilateral dorsal premotor cortex further increased dose-dependently after 1800 pulses of iTBS over M1. However, no correlation between changes in MEP amplitudes and functional connectivity was detected. In summary, our data show that increasing the number of iTBS stimulation blocks results in dose-dependent effects at the local level (cortical excitability) as well as at a systems level (functional connectivity) with a dose-dependent enhancement of dorsal premotor cortex-M1 connectivity.

1 September 2015 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CNCharlotte Nettekoven
Charlotte Nettekoven
LVLukas J. Volz
Lukas J. Volz
MLMartha Leimbach
Martha Leimbach
EPEva-Maria Pool
Eva-Maria Pool
ARAnne K. Rehme
Anne K. Rehme
CGChristian Grefkes
Christian Grefkes

14 March 2016 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LVLukas J. Volz
Lukas J. Volz
ARA. K. Rehme
A. K. Rehme
JMJ. Michely
J. Michely
CNC. Nettekoven
C. Nettekoven
SES. B. Eickhoff
S. B. Eickhoff
CGC. Grefkes
C. Grefkes
Neural plasticity is a major factor driving cortical reorganization after stroke. We here tested whether repetitively enhancing motor cortex plasticity by means of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) prior to physiotherapy might promote recovery of function early after stroke. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to elucidate underlying neural mechanisms. Twenty-six hospitalized, first-ever stroke patients (time since stroke: 1–16 days) with hand motor deficits were enrolled in a sham-controlled design and pseudo-randomized into 2 groups. iTBS was administered prior to physiotherapy on 5 consecutive days either over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1-stimulation group) or parieto-occipital vertex (control-stimulation group). Hand motor function, cortical excitability, and resting-state fMRI were assessed 1 day prior to the first stimulation and 1 day after the last stimulation. Recovery of grip strength was significantly stronger in the M1-stimulation compared to the control-stimulation group. Higher levels of motor network connectivity were associated with better motor outcome. Consistently, control-stimulated patients featured a decrease in intra- and interhemispheric connectivity of the motor network, which was absent in the M1-stimulation group. Hence, adding iTBS to prime physiotherapy in recovering stroke patients seems to interfere with motor network degradation, possibly reflecting alleviation of post-stroke diaschisis.

7 March 2014 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LVLukas J. Volz
Lukas J. Volz
MHMasashi Hamada
Masashi Hamada
JRJohn Rothwell
John Rothwell
CGChristian Grefkes
Christian Grefkes
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) evokes several volleys of corticospinal activity. While the earliest wave (D-wave) originates from axonal activation of cortico-spinal neurons (CSN), later waves (I-waves) result from activation of mono- and polysynaptic inputs to CSNs. Different coil orientations preferentially stimulate cortical elements evoking different outputs: latero-medial-induced current (LM) elicits D-waves and short-latency electromyographic responses (MEPs); posterior–anterior current (PA) evokes early I-waves. Anterior–posterior current (AP) is more variable and tends to recruit later I-waves, featuring longer onset latencies compared with PA-TMS. We tested whether the variability in response to AP-TMS was related to functional connectivity of the stimulated M1 in 20 right-handed healthy subjects who underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing an isometric contraction task. The MEP-latency after AP-TMS (relative to LM-TMS) was strongly correlated with functional connectivity between the stimulated M1 and a network involving cortical premotor areas. This indicates that stronger premotor–M1 connectivity increases the probability that AP-TMS recruits shorter latency input to CSNs. In conclusion, our data strongly support the hypothesis that TMS of M1 activates distinct neuronal pathways depending on the orientation of the stimulation coil. Particularly, AP currents seem to recruit short latency cortico-cortical projections from premotor areas.

6 January 2015 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJochen Michely
Jochen Michely
LVLukas J. Volz
Lukas J. Volz
MBMichael T. Barbe
Michael T. Barbe
FHFelix Hoffstaedter
Felix Hoffstaedter
SVShivakumar Viswanathan
Shivakumar Viswanathan
CGChristian Grefkes
Christian Grefkes
Although characteristic motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease such as bradykinesia typically improve under dopaminergic medication, deficits in higher motor control are less responsive. We here investigated the dopaminergic modulation of network dynamics underlying basic motor performance, i.e. finger tapping, and higher motor control, i.e. internally and externally cued movement preparation and selection. Twelve patients, assessed ON and OFF medication, and 12 age-matched healthy subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Dynamic causal modelling was used to assess effective connectivity in a motor network comprising cortical and subcortical regions. In particular, we investigated whether impairments in basic and higher motor control, and the effects induced by dopaminergic treatment are due to connectivity changes in (i) the mesial premotor loop comprising the supplementary motor area; (ii) the lateral premotor loop comprising lateral premotor cortex; and (iii) cortico-subcortical interactions. At the behavioural level, we observed a marked slowing of movement preparation and selection when patients were internally as opposed to externally cued. Preserved performance during external cueing was associated with enhanced connectivity between prefrontal cortex and lateral premotor cortex OFF medication, compatible with a context-dependent compensatory role of the lateral premotor loop in the hypodopaminergic state. Dopaminergic medication significantly improved finger tapping speed in patients, which correlated with a drug-induced coupling increase of prefrontal cortex with the supplementary motor area, i.e. the mesial premotor loop. In addition, only in the finger tapping condition, patients ON medication showed enhanced excitatory influences exerted by cortical premotor regions and the thalamus upon the putamen. In conclusion, the amelioration of bradykinesia by dopaminergic medication seems to be driven by enhanced connectivity within the mesial premotor loop and cortico-striatal interactions. In contrast, medication did not improve internal motor control deficits concurrent to missing effects at the connectivity level. This differential effect of dopaminergic medication on the network dynamics underlying motor control provides new insights into the clinical finding that in Parkinson’s disease dopaminergic drugs especially impact on bradykinesia but less on executive functions.

16 May 2014 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARA. K. Rehme
A. K. Rehme
LVLukas J. Volz
Lukas J. Volz
DFD.-L. Feis
D.-L. Feis
IBI. Bomilcar-Focke
I. Bomilcar-Focke
TLT. Liebig
T. Liebig
CGC. Grefkes
C. Grefkes
Conventional mass-univariate analyses have been previously used to test for group differences in neural signals. However, machine learning algorithms represent a multivariate decoding approach that may help to identify neuroimaging patterns associated with functional impairment in "individual" patients. We investigated whether fMRI allows classification of individual motor impairment after stroke using support vector machines (SVMs). Forty acute stroke patients and 20 control subjects underwent resting-state fMRI. Half of the patients showed significant impairment in hand motor function. Resting-state connectivity was computed by means of whole-brain correlations of seed time-courses in ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1). Lesion location was identified using diffusion-weighted images. These features were used for linear SVM classification of unseen patients with respect to motor impairment. SVM results were compared with conventional mass-univariate analyses. Resting-state connectivity classified patients with hand motor deficits compared with controls and nonimpaired patients with 82.6-87.6% accuracy. Classification was driven by reduced interhemispheric M1 connectivity and enhanced connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and premotor areas. In contrast, lesion location provided only 50% sensitivity to classify impaired patients. Hence, resting-state fMRI reflects behavioral deficits more accurately than structural MRI. In conclusion, multivariate fMRI analyses offer the potential to serve as markers for endophenotypes of functional impairment.