Objectives: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of cabazitaxel in relapsed penile cancer. Methods: This Phase II single-arm trial was designed to recruit 17 patients with relapsed penile cancer. The primary endpoint was objective (complete + partial) response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] v1.1). Treatment comprised six 21-day cycles of cabazitaxel with restaging after cycles 2 and 4. The planned interim analysis was based upon the premise that if none of the first nine patients achieved ORR, trial would be stopped (α = 0.05, Simon’s 2-stage design). Results: Nine patients were recruited from four UK centres between December 2014 and August 2016. The median age was 61 (range, 27–73.6) years, and seven patients had metastases. Patients received a median of two chemotherapy cycles (range, 2–5). None of the nine patients achieved ORR and the trial was stopped. Cabazitaxel was well tolerated with no dose reductions or delays. Three patients had grade 3/4 adverse events (anaemia, vomiting, or neutropenic sepsis). The median progression-free and overall survival were 1.3 and 5.6 months, respectively. Conclusions: The trial did not reach the threshold for further continuation of single-agent cabazitaxel. However, the observed tolerability profile supports its further investigation in combination with other agents to improve patient outcomes.

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed PET imaging has rapidly transformed prostate cancer workup over the past decade and paved the way for a theranostic approach using ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). This review gives an overview of the underlying principles behind PSMA as a target; the current use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer imaging and benefits compared to conventional imaging; and therapeutic applications including optimisation of patient selection. It also explores the evidence base of PSMA PET for other indications not in routine clinical use and the future of PSMA-directed RLT.

Background: There is currently no staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) that is adapted to decision‐making and universally used. Experts have unconscious ability to simplify the heterogeneity of clinical situations into a few relevant groups to drive their therapeutic decisions. Therefore, we have used unsupervised clustering of real cases by experts to generate an operational classification of cSCCs, an approach that was successful for basal cell carcinomas.Objectives: To generate a consensual and operational classification of cSCCs.Methods: Unsupervised independent clustering of 248 cases of cSCCs considered difficult‐to‐treat. Eighteen international experts from different specialties classified these cases into what they considered homogeneous clusters useful for management, each with freedom regarding clustering criteria. Convergences and divergences between clustering were analysed using a similarity matrix, the K‐mean approach and the average silhouette method. Mathematical modelling was used to look for the best consensual clustering. The operability of the derived classification was validated on 23 new practitioners.Results: Despite the high heterogeneity of the clinical cases, a mathematical consensus was observed. It was best represented by a partition into five clusters, which appeared a posteriori to describe different clinical scenarios. Applicability of this classification was shown by a good concordance (94%) in the allocation of cases between the new practitioners and the 18 experts. An additional group of easy‐to‐treat cSCC was included, resulting in a six‐group final classification: easy‐to‐treat/complex to treat due to tumour and/or patient characteristics/multiple/locally advanced/regional disease/visceral metastases.Conclusions: Given the methodology based on the convergence of unguided intuitive clustering of cases by experts, this new classification is relevant for clinical practice. It does not compete with staging systems, but they may complement each other, whether the objective is to select the best therapeutic approach in tumour boards or to design homogeneous groups for trials.