Julia Zimmermann

Dr. Julia Zimmermann

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2020 in Surgical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FKFlorian Kühn
Florian Kühn
UWUrlich Wirth
Urlich Wirth
JZJulia Zimmermann
Julia Zimmermann
NBNicola Beger
Nicola Beger
SHSandro M. Hasenhütl
Sandro M. Hasenhütl
TSTobias Schiergens
Tobias Schiergens
Background: Evidence for endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for colorectal defects is still based on small patient series from various institutions, employing different treatment algorithms and methods. As EVT was invented at our institution 20 years ago, the aim was to report the efficacy and safety of EVT for colorectal defects as well as to analyze factors associated with efficacy, therapy duration, and outpatient treatment. Methods: Cohort study with analysis of prospectively collected data of patients receiving EVT for colorectal defects at a tertiary referral center in Germany (n = 281). Results: The majority of patients had malignant disease (83%) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of III/IV (81%). Most frequent indications for EVT were anastomotic leakage after sigmoid or rectal resection (67%) followed by rectal stump leakage (20%). EVT was successful in 256 out of 281 patients (91%). EVT following multi-visceral resection (P = 0.037) and recent surgical revision after primary surgery (P = 0.009) were risk factors for EVT failure. EVT-associated adverse events occurred in 27 patients (10%). Median treatment duration was 25 days. Previous chemo-radiation (P = 0.006) was associated with a significant longer duration of EVT. Outpatient treatment was conducted in 49% of patients with a median hospital stay reduction of 15 days and 98% treatment success. Younger patient age (P = 0.044) was associated with the possibility of outpatient treatment. Restoration of intestinal continuity was achieved in 60% of patients where technically possible with a 12-month rate of 52%. Conclusions: In patients with colorectal defects, EVT appears to be a safe and effective, minimally invasive option for in- and outpatient treatment.

1 September 2022 in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JZJulia Zimmermann
Julia Zimmermann
RSRomina‐Marina Sima
Romina‐Marina Sima
MRMarc P. Radosa
Marc P. Radosa
CRChristoph G. Radosa
Christoph G. Radosa
LPLiana Ples
Liana Ples
JRJulia C. Radosa
Julia C. Radosa
Objective: To evaluate how hysterectomy performed for benign gynecologic pathologies affects the quality of life and sexual function of patients aged 35 years or younger, and if outcomes differ according to the surgical technique.Methods: Seventy‐three patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy (SLH), or vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for benign uterine disorders between April 2014 and June 2020 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany, were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Quality of life and sexual function were assessed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively using standardized validated questionnaires: the European Quality of Life Five‐Dimension Scale (EQ‐5D) and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).Results: Thirty‐three (45%) patients underwent TLH, 25 (34%) underwent SLH, and 15 (21%) patients underwent VH. The median preoperative EQ‐5D score, FSFI score, and EQ‐5D visual analog scale were 0.9 (range 0.62–1), 19.25 (range 2.4–27.4), and 50 (range 0–100); postoperative scores were 1 (range 0.61–1), 24.15 (range 3.9–29.3), and 90 (range 30–100), respectively (P ≤ 0.001). Postoperative scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores, with no significant difference according to the surgical technique.Conclusion: Hysterectomy for benign indication in women aged 35 years or less significantly improved the patients' quality of life and sexual function with no differences regarding the surgical technique.Clinical trial registration: The study was registered in the German trial registry (no. DRKS00005622).

17 November 2020 in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJulia Zimmermann
Julia Zimmermann
JRJ. C. Radosa
J. C. Radosa
MRM. P. Radosa
M. P. Radosa
PSP. Sklavounos
P. Sklavounos
PSP. A. Schweitzer
P. A. Schweitzer
ESE. F. Solomayer
E. F. Solomayer
Purpose: As data on this topic are sparse and contradictory, we aimed to ascertain the opinions of the members of the German Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (AGE) regarding the use of robotic surgery in the treatment of ovarian malignancies. Methods: In 2015, an anonymous questionnaire was sent to AGE members to assess their views on the treatment of ovarian malignancies by robotic surgery according to T stage and the current treatment practices in their facilities. Results: Of the 228 respondents, 132 (58%) were fellows or attending physicians and 156 (68%) worked at university hospitals or tertiary referral centers. Most [n = 218 (96%)] respondents reported treating < 10% of their patients using robotic surgery. Respondents felt that T1 and borderline ovarian tumors, but not T2 (51%) or T3/4 (76%) tumors, should and could be treated by robot surgery. 162 (71%) respondents considered the currently available data on this subject to be insufficient, and 42% indicated their willingness to participate in clinical studies on the applicability of robotic surgery to the treatment of T1/2 ovarian tumors. Conclusion: The majority of AGE members surveyed considered robotic surgery to be an option for the treatment of T1 ovarian malignancies and borderline ovarian tumors. However, prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the relevance of robotic surgery in this context.

13 March 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJulia Zimmermann
Julia Zimmermann
MFMathias Fousse
Mathias Fousse
IJIngolf Juhasz-Böss
Ingolf Juhasz-Böss
JRJulia C. Radosa
Julia C. Radosa
ESErich Solomayer
Erich Solomayer
RMRuben Mühl-Benninghaus
Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus
Headache is a common symptom during pregnancy and in puerperium that requires careful consideration, as it may be caused by a life-threatening condition. Headaches in pregnant women and women in puerperium are classified as primary or secondary; acute, severe and newly diagnosed headaches should prompt further investigation. We aimed to further characterise the demographic features, symptoms, examination findings, and neuroimaging results of cases of headache during pregnancy and in puerperium. All pregnant women or women in postpartum conditions who attended neurological consultations at the emergency department of the clinic for Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine of Saarland University/Germany between 2001/2015 and 2012/2019 were enrolled in this retrospective chart review. Data collected from the charts included demographic/pregnancy characteristics, clinical features and imaging findings. Descriptive statistics as well as binary logistic regression were performed. More than 50% of 97 patients had abnormal findings in their neurological examination. Magnetic resonance imaging findings were pathological for almost 20% of patients—indicating conditions such as cerebral venous thrombosis, reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy, brain tumour and intracranial bleeding. The odds of abnormal neuroimaging results were 2.2-times greater among women with abnormal neurological examination findings than among those with normal examination results. In cases of headache during pregnancy and in puerperium, neuroimaging should be indicated early on. Further research is needed to determine which conditions indicate a need for immediate neuroimaging.

18 January 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMariz Kasoha
Mariz Kasoha
ASAnna K. Steinbach
Anna K. Steinbach
RBRainer M. Bohle
Rainer M. Bohle
BLBarbara Linxweiler
Barbara Linxweiler
BHBashar Haj Hamoud
Bashar Haj Hamoud
JRJulia C. Radosa
Julia C. Radosa
Purpose: To investigate the role of Dkk1 as a predictor of response to NACT in BC patients. Methods: This retrospective monocentric study included 145 women who had undergone NACT followed by breast surgery. Dkk1 protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry staining in core needle biopsies and mammary carcinoma specimens. Results: Dkk1 levels were lower in treated BC tumours than in untreated tumours. The outcomes of 68 matched pre- and post-therapy tissues showed that Dkk1 levels in mammary carcinoma tissues were significantly predicted by levels in core needle biopsies and that Dkk1 expression was reduced in 83% of cases. Smaller cT stage, positive Her2 expression, and decreased Dkk1-IRS in core needle biopsy tissues were all independent predictors of regression grade (R4), according to Sinn. However, the percentage of Dkk1 expression differences prior to and following NACT had no effect on PFS or OS. Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that Dkk1 could be identified as an independent predictor of NACT response in BC patients, particularly those with TNBC. Further research with a multicentric expanded (pre-/post-therapy) sample set and better-defined populations in terms of molecular subtypes, therapy modality, and long-term follow-up is recommended to obtain more solid evidence.

22 October 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJulia Zimmermann
Julia Zimmermann
PRPauline Ramisch
Pauline Ramisch
MRMarc P. Radosa
Marc P. Radosa
CRChristoph G. Radosa
Christoph G. Radosa
AKAskin C. Kaya
Askin C. Kaya
JRJulia C. Radosa
Julia C. Radosa
The demand for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has increased in the last decade due to increased maternal age, increased incidence of ovarian malignancies in younger patients, and technical advances in surgery. Data on oncological safety and fertility outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer after laparoscopic FSS are sparse, but some retrospective studies have shown that open FSS may be offered to selected patients. We assessed the role of minimally invasive FSS in comparison with radical surgery (RS) in terms of oncological safety and reproductive outcomes after FSS in this multicenter study. Eighty patients with FIGO stage I/II ovarian cancer treated with laparoscopic FSS or RS between 01/2000 and 10/2018 at the participating centers (comprehensive gynecological cancer centers with minimally invasive surgical expertise) were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively kept data. Case–control (n = 40 each) matching according to the FIGO stage was performed. Progression-free survival [150 (3–150) and 150 (5–150) months; p = 0.61] and overall survival [36 (3–150) and 50 (1–275) months; p = 0.65] did not differ between the FSS and RS groups. Eight (25.8%) women became pregnant after FSS, resulting in seven (22.5%) deliveries; three (37.5%) patients conceived after in vitro fertilization, and five (62.5%) conceived spontaneously. Laparoscopic FSS seems to be applicable and oncologically safe for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, with adequate fertility outcomes.