The effects of long-term heavy metal contamination on the soil biological processes and soil microbial communities were investigated in a typical electroplating site in Zhangjiakou, China. It was found that the soil of the electroplating plant at Zhangjiakou were heavily polluted by Cr, Cr (VI), Ni, Cu, and Zn, with concentrations ranged from 112.8 to 9727.2, 0 to 1083.3, 15.6 to 58.4, 10.8 to 510.0 and 69.6 to 631.6 mg/kg, respectively. Soil urease and phosphatase activities were significantly inhibited by the heavy metal contamination, while the microbial biomass carbon content and the bacterial community richness were much lower compared to noncontaminated samples, suggesting that the long-term heavy metal contamination had a severe negative effect on soil microorganisms. Differently, soil dehydrogenase was promoted in the presence of Chromate compared to noncontaminated samples. This might be due to the enrichment of Sphingomonadaceae, which have been proven to be able to secrete dehydrogenase. The high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene documented that Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi were the dominant bacterial phyla in the contaminated soil. The Spearman correlation analysis showed the Methylobacillus, Muribaculaceae, and Sphingomonadaceae were able to tolerate high concentrations of Cr, Cr (VI), Cu, and Zn, indicating their potential in soil remediation.

The alkali digestion pretreatment method in the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 3060A could underestimate the content of Cr(VI) in Cr-contaminated soils, especially for soils mixed with chromite ore processing residue (COPR), which leads to a misjudgment of the Cr(VI) level in soils after remediation, causing secondary pollution to the environment. In this study, a new pretreatment method to analyze Cr(VI) concentration in contaminated soils was established. The impacts of soil quality, particle size, alkali digestion time and the rounds of alkali digestion on Cr(VI) detection in contaminated soils was explored and the alkali digestion method was optimized. Compared with USEPA Method 3060A, the alkaline digestion time was prolonged to 6 h and multiple alkali digestion was employed until the amount of Cr(VI) in the last extraction was less than 10% of the total amount of Cr(VI). Because Cr(VI) in COPR is usually embedded in the mineral phase structure, the hydration products were dissolved and Cr(VI) was released gradually during the alkaline digestion process. The amount of Cr(VI) detected showed high correlation coefficients with the percentage of F1 (mild acid-soluble fraction), F2 (reducible fraction) and F4 (residual fraction). The Cr(VI) contents detected by the new alkaline digestion method and USEPA Method 3060A showed significant differences for soil samples mixed with COPR due to their high percentage of residual fraction. This new pretreatment method could quantify more than 90% of Cr(VI) in Cr-contaminated soils, especially those mixed with COPR, which proved to be a promising method for Cr(VI) analysis in soils, before and after remediation.

Various green materials like biochar and Fe⁰ (nano-scale zerovalent iron, nZVI) have been applied to remediate aqueous Cr(VI) contamination, but few studies have tried to further improve the performance of nZVI and/or biochar composites with different sulfidation methods. Here, we modified a hybrid material of nZVI@biochar with Na₂S and pyrite (FeS₂), applied it to remove aqueous Cr(VI) under different experimental conditions, and revealed key factors influencing Cr(VI) removal performance. The results show that pyrite loading is an effective sulfidation method to increase the Fe and S contents in composites. FeS_x-nZVI@BC (1:1) had a Cr(VI) removal efficiency of ~95% with 5 mg/L Cr(VI) loaded, which was much higher than other hybrid composites. The Cr(VI) removal efficiency of FeSx-nZVI@BC showed a decreasing trend under pH conditions that increased from pH 3 to pH 9. The presence of dissolved oxygen and aqueous Cu²⁺ and Cd²⁺ could significantly suppress the removal of aqueous Cr(VI), while humic acids at different concentrations did not suppress Cr(VI) removal. After the reaction, it was observed with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS) that most Cr in the solid phase was closely associated with pyrite minerals. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra, together with the Fe²⁺-quenching method, confirmed that Fe (Fe²⁺ or Fe⁰) acted as the main electron donor, contributing to ~90% of the Cr(VI) reduction. Our study indicates that pyrite loading could further improve the performance of remediation materials and that the pyrite-loaded nZVI@BC composite is a green material with strong potential to be applied in the remediation of water contaminated by Cr(VI).

Phosphogypsum (PG) stacks are traditionally assessed as sources of legacy inorganic contaminants, but the behavior of emerging contaminants in these chemically complex systems remains poorly understood. This opinion article proposes that PFAS, if present in PG stacks, may not be adequately described by partitioning concepts derived from dilute groundwater or ordinary soil porewater systems. Instead, the low-pH, high-ionic-strength, and calcium–sulfate-rich conditions of PG leachate may promote hydrochemistry-mediated repartitioning of PFAS. Under such conditions, PFAS may exhibit reduced apparent aqueous stability, enhanced association with PG particles or colloids, retention on particle surfaces, and enrichment at air–water interfaces, forming potential hidden reservoirs with the potential for delayed release and episodic remobilization. Consequently, dissolved concentrations alone may underestimate total PFAS storage and long-term groundwater risk in and around PG stack systems. Overall, this study highlights the need to shift from conventional dilute-system assumptions toward a hydrochemically mediated multiphase framework for PFAS occurrence assessment, monitoring design, and risk evaluation in phosphogypsum environments and other chemically complex industrial waste systems.