Exponentially growingrecAmutant cells ofEscherichia colidisplay pronounced DNA degradation that starts at the sites of DNA damage and depends on RecBCD nuclease (ExoV) activity. As a consequence of this “reckless” DNA degradation, populations ofrecAmutants contain a large proportion of anucleate cells. We have found that both DNA degradation and anucleate-cell production are efficiently suppressed by mutations in thexonA(sbcB) andsbcDgenes. The suppressive effects of these mutations were observed in normally grown, as well as in UV-irradiated,recAcells. The products of thexonAandsbcDgenes are known to code for the ExoI and SbcCD nucleases, respectively. Since bothxonAandsbcDmutations are required for strong suppression of DNA degradation while individual mutations have only a weak suppressive effect, we infer that ExoI and SbcCD play partially redundant roles in regulating DNA degradation inrecAcells. We suggest that their roles might be in processing (blunting) DNA ends, thereby producing suitable substrates for RecBCD binding.

Escherichia coli cells with mutations in recBC genes are defective for the main RecBCD pathway of recombination and have severe reductions in conjugational and transductional recombination, as well as in recombinational repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. This phenotype can be corrected by suppressor mutations in sbcB and sbcC ( D ) genes, which activate an alternative RecF pathway of recombination. It was previously suggested that sbcB15 and Δ sbcB mutations, both of which inactivate exonuclease I, are equally efficient in suppressing the recBC phenotype. In the present work we reexamined the effects of sbcB15 and Δ sbcB mutations on DNA repair after UV and γ irradiation, on conjugational recombination, and on the viability of recBC ( sbcC ) cells. We found that the sbcB15 mutation is a stronger recBC suppressor than Δ sbcB , suggesting that some unspecified activity of the mutant SbcB15 protein may be favorable for recombination in the RecF pathway. We also showed that the xonA2 mutation, a member of another class of ExoI mutations, had the same effect on recombination as Δ sbcB , suggesting that it is an sbcB null mutation. In addition, we demonstrated that recombination in a recBC sbcB15 sbcC mutant is less affected by recF and recQ mutations than recombination in recBC Δ sbcB sbcC and recBC xonA2 sbcC strains is, indicating that SbcB15 alleviates the requirement for the RecFOR complex and RecQ helicase in recombination processes. Our results suggest that two types of sbcB -sensitive RecF pathways can be distinguished in E. coli , one that is activated by the sbcB15 mutation and one that is activated by sbcB null mutations. Possible roles of SbcB15 in recombination reactions in the RecF pathway are discussed.

Bacterial SSB proteins, as well as their eukaryotic RPA analogues, are essential and ubiquitous. They avidly bind single-stranded DNA and regulate/coordinate its metabolism, hence enabling essential DNA processes such as replication, transcription, and repair. The prototypic Escherichia coli SSB protein is encoded by an ssb gene. Although the ssb gene promoters harbor an SOS box, multiple studies over several decades failed to elucidate whether ssb gene expression is inducible and SOS dependent. The SOS regulon is comprised of about 50 genes, whose transcription is coordinately induced under stress conditions. Using quantitative real-time PCR, we determined the ssb gene expression kinetics in UV- and γ-irradiated E. coli and revealed that ssb gene expression is elevated in irradiated cells in an SOS-dependent manner. Additionally, the expression of the sulA gene was determined to indicate the extent of SOS induction. In a mutant with a constitutively induced SOS regulon, the ssb gene was overexpressed in the absence of DNA damage. Furthermore, we measured ssb gene expression by droplet digital PCR during unaffected bacterial growth and revealed that ssb gene expression was equal in wild-type and SOS⁻ bacteria, whereas sulA expression was higher in the former. This study thus reveals a complex pattern of ssb gene expression, which under stress conditions depends on the SOS regulon, whereas during normal bacterial growth it is unlinked to SOS induction. The E. coli ssb gene is SOS regulated in such a way that its basal expression is relatively high and can be increased only through stronger SOS induction. The remarkable SOS induction observed in undisturbed wild-type cells may challenge our notion of the physiological role of the SOS response in bacteria.

Genome stability in radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans depends on RecA, the main bacterial recombinase. Without RecA, gross genome rearrangements occur during repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Long repeated (insertion) sequences have been identified as hot spots for ectopic recombination leading to genome rearrangements, and single-strand annealing (SSA) postulated to be the most likely mechanism involved in this process. Here, we have sequenced five isolates of D. radiodurans recA mutant carrying gross genome rearrangements to precisely characterize the rearrangements and to elucidate the underlying repair mechanism. The detected rearrangements consisted of large deletions in chromosome II in all the sequenced recA isolates. The mechanism behind these deletions clearly differs from the classical SSA; it utilized short (4–11 bp) repeats as opposed to insertion sequences or other long repeats. Moreover, it worked over larger linear DNA distances from those previously tested. Our data are most compatible with alternative end-joining, a recombination mechanism that operates in eukaryotes, but is also found in Escherichia coli. Additionally, despite the recA isolates being preselected for different rearrangement patterns, all identified deletions were found to overlap in a 35 kb genomic region. We weigh the evidence for mechanistic vs. adaptive reasons for this phenomenon.

The bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans is known to efficiently and accurately reassemble its genome after hundreds of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Only at very large amounts of radiation-induced DSBs is this accuracy affected in the wild-type D. radiodurans, causing rearrangements in its genome structure. However, changes in its genome structure may also be possible during the propagation and storage of cell cultures. We investigate this possibility by listing structural differences between three completely sequenced genomes of D. radiodurans strains with a recent common ancestor—the type strain stored and sequenced in two different laboratories (of the ATCC 13939 lineage) and the first sequenced strain historically used as the reference (ATCC BAA-816). We detected a number of structural differences and found the most likely mechanisms behind them: (i) transposition/copy number change in mobile interspersed repeats—insertion sequences and small non-coding repeats, (ii) variable number of monomers within tandem repeats, (iii) deletions between long direct DNA repeats, and (iv) deletions between short (4–10 bp) direct DNA repeats. The most surprising finding was the deletions between short repeats because it indicates the utilization of a less accurate DSB repair mechanism in conditions in which a more accurate one should be both available and preferred. The detected structural differences, as well as SNPs and short indels, while being important footprints of deinococcal DNA metabolism and repair, are also a valuable resource for researchers using these D. radiodurans strains.