The SuperPATH approach is a direct superior portal-assisted approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) that utilizes the interval between the gluteus minimus and the piriformis to access the hip capsule. Patients and Methods: SuperPATH arthroplasty was performed by a single surgeon between December of 2016 and December of 2021 in 344 cases. The technique described by Chow was performed in all cases. The average length of stay was 1.3 days, and all patients were discharged for home. All patients were mobilized on the day of the operation. Six cases presented complications: four intraoperative femur fractures and two peroneal nerve palsies. No infection and no hip dislocation were noticed in any case. Modifications: We recommend that the patient be placed as far from the surgeon as possible as well as the use of a sterilized standard linen pack to elevate the foot and internally rotate the hip. In addition, regarding instrumentation, we recommend the use of a 4.5 mm drill for the first guidance femur drilling and a standard corkscrew for femoral head removal. Finally, we propose a different reduction technique using a hook. The use of the SuperPATH approach allows for maximal tissue sparing through preservation of external rotators and minimizing stretching of the gluteus medius. There is no range of motion restrictions postoperatively and patients can achieve a high level of function with a very low dislocation risk and reduced inpatient stay. Furthermore, an incision extension is possible if needed in complex cases. For surgeons familiar with the standard posterolateral approach, the SuperPATH approach is a reliable and safe method with promising results for the patient. In order to improve the surgical effect and facilitate some steps in the procedure, we share our experience and recommend some modifications.

Introduction: Many orthopedic surgeons recommend ischemic tourniquets during arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair to reduce blood loss and improve visibility. However, their use remains controversial due to potential complications. Similarly, the practice of postoperative drainage is debated. While its proponents argue it reduces limb swelling, DVT, adhesions, and stiffness, others contend that it may increase infection risk or harm the ACL graft and joint surfaces. Materials and Methods: A total of 456 patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between September 2015 and December 2024, without the use of a tourniquet or drainage. The patients were 334 men with a mean age of 34.7 years and 122 women with a mean age of 32.3 years. In 389 cases the graft type was a hamstring autograft, in 55 cases a patellar tendon autograft (BPTB) was used, and in 12 cases a quadriceps tendon autograft was used. Results: The mean operative time was 61 min (range 52–79). No cases experienced visual impairment or required ischemia to enhance visibility. Bleeding sites were successfully cauterized during arthroscopy. Postoperative complications included knee hematoma in three patients (0.7%), resolved after drainage on day one, and two infections (0.4%), treated successfully with arthroscopic drainage and implant removal. No further complications were reported. Conclusion: Although many orthopedic surgeons prefer arthroscopic ACL repair with a tourniquet for better visibility and reduced intraoperative blood loss, this approach carries risks such as nerve palsy, joint swelling, stiffness, muscle weakness, and vascular changes. Not using a tourniquet can help to identify bleeding sites and allows for a more thorough procedure. The literature suggests that avoiding a tourniquet also reduces postoperative pain and accelerates recovery. The mean operative time for ACL reconstruction was consistent with the literature, indicating that avoiding a tourniquet did not cause delays. Additionally, the absence of postoperative drainage did not lead to complications, with most patients showing no issues like bleeding, hematoma, ischemia, or poor wound healing.