Oliver Sutcliffe

Dr. Oliver Sutcliffe

1. MANchester DRug Analysis & Knowledge Exchange (MANDRAKE), Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

2 June 2015 in The Analyst
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJamie P. Smith
Jamie P. Smith
Oliver SutcliffeOliver Sutcliffe
Oliver Sutcliffe
Craig BanksCraig Banks
Craig Banks
New psychoactive substances (NPSs), sometimes referred to as “legal highs” in more colloquial environments/the media, are a class of compounds that have been recently made available for abuse (not necessarily recently discovered) which provide similar effects to the traditional well studied illegal drugs but are not always controlled under existing local, regional or international drug legislation. Following an unprecedented increase in the number of NPSs in the last 5 years (with 101 substances discovered for the first time in 2014 alone) its, occasionally fatal, consequences have been extensively reported in the media. Such NPSs are typically marketed as ‘not for human consumption’ and are instead labelled and sold as plant food, bath salts as well as a whole host of other equally nondescript aliases in order to bypass legislative controls. NPSs are a new multi-disciplinary research field with the main emphasis in terms of forensic identification due to their adverse health effects, which can range from minimal to life threatening and even fatalities. In this mini-review we overview this recent emerging research area of NPSs and the analytical approaches reported to provide detection strategies as well as detailing recent reports towards providing point-of-care/in-the-field NPS (“legal high”) sensors.

27 August 2014 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJamie P. Smith
Jamie P. Smith
JMJonathan P. Metters
Jonathan P. Metters
OKOsama I. G. Khreit
Osama I. G. Khreit
Oliver SutcliffeOliver Sutcliffe
Oliver Sutcliffe
Craig BanksCraig Banks
Craig Banks

1 September 2011 in Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GKGordon J. Kirkpatrick
Gordon J. Kirkpatrick
JPJane A. Plumb
Jane A. Plumb
Oliver SutcliffeOliver Sutcliffe
Oliver Sutcliffe
DFDavid J. Flint
David J. Flint
Nial WheateNial Wheate
Nial Wheate

15 January 2020 in Drug Testing and Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CNCaitlyn Norman
Caitlyn Norman
GWGillian Walker
Gillian Walker
BMBrian McKirdy
Brian McKirdy
CMCiara McDonald
Ciara McDonald
DFDaniel Fletcher
Daniel Fletcher
CMCraig McKenzie
Craig McKenzie

22 November 2021 in Drug Testing and Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRobert Kronstrand
Robert Kronstrand
CNCaitlyn Norman
Caitlyn Norman
SVSvante Vikingsson
Svante Vikingsson
ABAnoek Biemans
Anoek Biemans
BCBryan Valencia Crespo
Bryan Valencia Crespo
Henrik GréenHenrik Gréen
Henrik Gréen
Early warning systems detect new psychoactive substances (NPS), while dedicated monitoring programs and routine drug and toxicology testing identify fluctuations in prevalence. We report the increasing prevalence of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist (SCRA) ADB‐BUTINACA (N‐[1‐amino‐3,3‐dimethyl‐1‐oxobutan‐2‐yl]‐1‐butyl‐1H‐indazole‐3‐carbox‐amide). ADB‐BUTINACA was first detected in a seizure in Sweden in 2019, and we report its detection in 13 routine Swedish forensic toxicology cases soon after. In January 2021, ADB‐BUTINACA was detected in SCRA‐infused papers seized in Scottish prisons and has rapidly increased in prevalence, being detected in 60.4% of the SCRA‐infused papers tested between January and July 2021. In this work, ADB‐BUTINACA was incubated with human hepatocytes (HHeps), and 21 metabolites were identified in vitro, 14 being detected in authentic case samples. The parent drug and metabolites B9 (mono‐hydroxylation on the n‐butyl tail) and B16 (mono‐hydroxylation on the indazole ring) are recommended biomarkers in blood, while metabolites B4 (dihydrodiol formation on the indazole core), B9, and B16 are suitable biomarkers in urine. ADB‐4en‐PINACA (N‐[1‐amino‐3,3‐dimethyl‐1‐oxobutan‐2‐yl]‐1‐[pent‐4‐en‐1‐yl]‐1H‐indazole‐3‐carboxamide) was detected in Scottish prisons in December 2020, but, unlike ADB‐BUTINACA, prevalence has remained low. ADB‐4en‐PINACA was incubated with HHeps, and 11 metabolites were identified. Metabolites E3 (dihydrodiol formed in the tail moiety) and E7 (hydroxylation on the linked/head group) are the most abundant metabolites in vitro and are suggested as urinary biomarkers. The in vitro potencies of ADB‐BUTINACA (EC50, 11.5 nM and ADB‐4en‐PINACA (EC50, 11.6 nM) are similar to that of MDMB‐4en‐PINACA (EC50, 4.3 nM). A third tert‐leucinamide SCRA, ADB‐HEXINACA was also detected in prison samples and warrants further investigation.