Carlos Thomaz

Dr. Carlos Thomaz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2010 in Image and Vision Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCarlos Thomaz
Carlos Thomaz
GGGilson Antonio Giraldi
Gilson Antonio Giraldi

1 August 2015 in Psychiatry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJoão R. Sato
João R. Sato
JMJorge Moll
Jorge Moll
SGSophie Green
Sophie Green
JDJohn F.W. Deakin
John F.W. Deakin
CTCarlos Thomaz
Carlos Thomaz
RZRoland Zahn
Roland Zahn
Standard functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analyses cannot assess the potential of a neuroimaging signature as a biomarker to predict individual vulnerability to major depression (MD). Here, we use machine learning for the first time to address this question. Using a recently identified neural signature of guilt-selective functional disconnection, the classification algorithm was able to distinguish remitted MD from control participants with 78.3% accuracy. This demonstrates the high potential of our fMRI signature as a biomarker of MD vulnerability.

3 March 2004 in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCarlos Thomaz
Carlos Thomaz
DGD.F. Gillies
D.F. Gillies
Raul FeitosaRaul Feitosa
Raul Feitosa
In many biometric pattern-recognition problems, the number of training examples per class is limited, and consequently the sample group covariance matrices often used in parametric and nonparametric Bayesian classifiers are poorly estimated or singular. Thus, a considerable amount of effort has been devoted to the design of other covariance estimators, for use in limited-sample and high-dimensional classification problems. In this paper, a new covariance estimate, called the maximum entropy covariance selection (MECS) method, is proposed. It is based on combining covariance matrices under the principle of maximum uncertainty. In order to evaluate the MECS effectiveness in biometric problems, experiments on face, facial expression, and fingerprint classification were carried out and compared with popular covariance estimates, including the regularized discriminant analysis and leave-one-out covariance for the parametric classifier, and the Van Ness and Toeplitz covariance estimates for the nonparametric classifier. The results show that, in image recognition applications whenever the sample group covariance matrices are poorly estimated or ill posed, the MECS method is faster and usually more accurate than the aforementioned approaches in both parametric and nonparametric Bayesian classifiers.

1 February 2013 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHEmma L. Hall
Emma L. Hall
MWMark W. Woolrich
Mark W. Woolrich
CTCarlos Thomaz
Carlos Thomaz
PMPeter G. Morris
Peter G. Morris
MBMatthew J. Brookes
Matthew J. Brookes

1 October 2010 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJoao Ricardo Sato
Joao Ricardo Sato
AFAndré Fujita
André Fujita
ECElisson F. Cardoso
Elisson F. Cardoso
CTCarlos Thomaz
Carlos Thomaz
MBMichael J. Brammer
Michael J. Brammer
EAEdson Amaro
Edson Amaro

1 May 2009 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJoao Ricardo Sato
Joao Ricardo Sato
AFAndré Fujita
André Fujita
CTCarlos Thomaz
Carlos Thomaz
MMMaria da Graça Morais Martin
Maria da Graça Morais Martin
JMJanaina Mourão-Miranda
Janaina Mourão-Miranda
EJEdson Amaro Junior
Edson Amaro Junior