David Tanner

Dr. David Tanner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in Earth-Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristian Brandes
Christian Brandes
DTDavid Tanner
David Tanner

1 March 2012 in Quaternary Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristian Brandes
Christian Brandes
JWJutta Winsemann
Jutta Winsemann
JRJulia Roskosch
Julia Roskosch
JMJanine Meinsen
Janine Meinsen
DTDavid Tanner
David Tanner
PWPatrick Wu
Patrick Wu

11 February 2014 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMichael Krumbholz
Michael Krumbholz
CHChristoph F. Hieronymus
Christoph F. Hieronymus
SBSteffi Burchardt
Steffi Burchardt
VTValentin R. Troll
Valentin R. Troll
DTDavid Tanner
David Tanner
NFNadine Friese
Nadine Friese
Magmatic sheet intrusions (dykes) constitute the main form of magma transport in the Earth's crust. The size distribution of dykes is a crucial parameter that controls volcanic surface deformation and eruption rates and is required to realistically model volcano deformation for eruption forecasting. Here we present statistical analyses of 3,676 dyke thickness measurements from different tectonic settings and show that dyke thickness consistently follows the Weibull distribution. Known from materials science, power law-distributed flaws in brittle materials lead to Weibull-distributed failure stress. We therefore propose a dynamic model in which dyke thickness is determined by variable magma pressure that exploits differently sized host-rock weaknesses. The observed dyke thickness distributions are thus site-specific because rock strength, rather than magma viscosity and composition, exerts the dominant control on dyke emplacement. Fundamentally, the strength of geomaterials is scale-dependent and should be approximated by a probability distribution.

1 June 2008 in Journal of Structural Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLTina Lohr
Tina Lohr
CKCharlotte M. Krawczyk
Charlotte M. Krawczyk
OOOnno Oncken
Onno Oncken
DTDavid Tanner
David Tanner

1 April 2008 in AAPG Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLTina Lohr
Tina Lohr
CKCharlotte M. Krawczyk
Charlotte M. Krawczyk
DTDavid Tanner
David Tanner
RSRamin Samiee
Ramin Samiee
HEHeike Endres
Heike Endres
PKPeter A. Kukla
Peter A. Kukla
In addition to seismically mapped fault structures, a large number of faults below the limit of seismic resolution contribute to subsurface deformation. However, a correlation between large- and small-scale faults is difficult because of their strong variation in orientation. A workflow to analyze deformation over different scales is described here. Based on the combination of seismic interpretation, coherency analysis, geostatistical analysis, kinematic modeling, and well data analysis, we constrained the density and orientation of subseismic faults and made predictions about reactivation and opening of fractures. We interpreted faults in seismic and coherency volumes at scales between several kilometers and a few tens of meters. Three-dimensional (3-D) retrodeformation was performed on a detailed interpreted 3-D structural model to simulate strain in the hanging wall at the time of faulting, at a scale below seismic resolution. The modeling results show that (1) considerable strain is observed more than 1 km (0.62 mi) away from the fault trace and (2) deformation around the fault causes strain variations, depending on the fault morphology. This strain variation is responsible for the heterogeneous subseismic fracture distribution observed in wells. We linked the fracture density from the well data with the modeled strain magnitude and used the strain magnitude as a proxy for fracture density. With this method, we can predict the relative density of small-scale fractures in areas without well data. Furthermore, knowing the orientation of the local strain axis, we predict a fault strike and opening or reactivation of fractures during a particular deformation event.

1 January 2012 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristian Brandes
Christian Brandes
DTDavid Tanner
David Tanner