Andrew D Henderson

Dr. Andrew D Henderson

École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2007 in Environmental Engineering Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAndrew D Henderson
Andrew D Henderson
ADAvery H. Demond
Avery H. Demond
Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) have shown great promise as an alternative to pump and treat for the remediation of groundwater containing a wide array of contaminants including organics, metals, and radionuclides. Analyses to date have focused on individual case studies, rather than considering broad performance issues. In response to this need, this study analyzed data from field installations of in situ zero-valent iron (ZVI) PRBs to determine what parameters contribute to PRB failure. Although emphasis has been placed on losses of reactivity and permeability, imperfect hydraulic characterization was the most common cause of the few PRB failures reported in the literature. Graphical and statistical analyses suggested that internal EH, influent pH, and influent concentrations of alkalinity, NO3 − and Cl− are likely to be the strongest predictors of PRBs that could be at risk for diminished performance. Parameters often cited in the literature such as saturation indices, dissolved oxygen, and total dissolved solids did not seem to have much predictive capability. Because of the relationship between the predictive parameters and corrosion inhibition, it appears that reactivity of the ZVI, rather than the reduction in permeability, is more likely the factor that limits PRB longevity in the field. Due to the sparseness of field monitoring of parameters such as EH, the data available for these analyses were limited. Consequently, these results need to be corroborated as additional measurements become available.

10 September 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FVFrancesca Verones
Francesca Verones
JBJane Bare
Jane Bare
CBCécile Bulle
Cécile Bulle
RFRolf Frischknecht
Rolf Frischknecht
MHMichael Hauschild
Michael Hauschild
PFPeter Fantke
Peter Fantke

13 July 2011 in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRalph K. Rosenbaum
Ralph K. Rosenbaum
MHMark Huijbregts
Mark Huijbregts
AHAndrew D Henderson
Andrew D Henderson
MMManuele Margni
Manuele Margni
TMThomas E. McKone
Thomas E. McKone
OJOlivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet

1 January 2017 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPStephan Pfister
Stephan Pfister
ABAnne-Marie Boulay
Anne-Marie Boulay
MBMarkus Berger
Markus Berger
MHMichalis Hadjikakou
Michalis Hadjikakou
Masaharu MotoshitaMasaharu Motoshita
Masaharu Motoshita
AHAndrew D Henderson
Andrew D Henderson

8 June 2011 in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAndrew D Henderson
Andrew D Henderson
MHMichael Z. Hauschild
Michael Z. Hauschild
DMDik van de Meent
Dik van de Meent
MHMark Huijbregts
Mark Huijbregts
HLHenrik Fred Larsen
Henrik Fred Larsen
OJOlivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet

2 February 2012 in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRoel J. K. Helmes
Roel J. K. Helmes
MHMark Huijbregts
Mark Huijbregts
AHAndrew D Henderson
Andrew D Henderson
OJOlivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet
Purpose The location of a phosphorus emission can strongly affect its expected fate in freshwater. To date, in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), fate factors for phosphorus emissions have been derived for continents or large countries and had limited spatial resolution. These fate factors do not account sufficiently for local variations and are not applicable globally. In this paper, fate factors for freshwater eutrophication are derived for phosphorus emissions to freshwater on a global scale with a half-degree resolution. Methods For this purpose, a new global fate model for phosphorus has been developed on a half-degree resolution. The removal processes taken into account are grid-specific advection, phosphorus retention and water use. Aggregated fate factors based on archetypes and on administrative units are presented. Results and discussion The derived fate factors represent the persistence of phosphorus in the freshwater environment. The typical fate factor of phosphorus emissions to freshwater is 10 days and can vary more than 2 orders of magnitude among the grid cells (the 5th and 95th percentile are 0.8 and 310 days, respectively). Advection is the dominant removal process of phosphorus in freshwater (67.5%), followed by retention (27.6%) and water use (4.9%). Conclusions The results demonstrate inclusion of information on the location of phosphorus emissions to freshwater can improve the comparative power of the fate factor implementation in LCAs. The fate factors enable consistent assessment and comparison of freshwater eutrophication impacts at different locations across the globe.