Activating mutations in KRAS are highly prevalent in solid tumours and are frequently found in 35% of lung, 45% of colorectal, and up to 90% of pancreatic cancers. Mutated KRAS is a prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC and is associated with a more aggressive clinical phenotype, highlighting the need for KRAS-targeted therapy. Once considered undruggable due to its smooth shallow surface, a breakthrough showed that the activated G12C-mutated KRAS isozyme can be directly inhibited via a newly identified switch II pocket. This discovery led to the development of a new class of selective small-molecule inhibitors against the KRAS G12C isoform. Sotorasib and adagrasib are approved in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Currently, there are at least twelve KRAS G12C inhibitors being tested in clinical trials, either as a single agent or in combination. In this study, KRAS mutation prevalence, subtypes, rates of occurrence in treatment-resistant invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMAs), and novel drug delivery options are reviewed. Additionally, the current status of KRAS inhibitors, multiple resistance mechanisms that limit efficacy, and their use in combination treatment strategies and novel multitargeted approaches in NSCLC are discussed.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy with an aggressive behavior and dismal prognosis. 5-year overall survival remains a disappointing 7%. Genomically, SCLCs are homogeneous compared to non-small cell lung cancers and are characterized almost always by functional inactivation of RB1 and TP53 with no actionable mutations. Additionally, SCLCs histologically appear uniform. Thus, SCLCs are currently managed as a single disease with platinum-based chemotherapy remaining the cornerstone of treatment. Recent studies have identified expression of dominant transcriptional signatures which may permit classification of SCLCs into four biologically distinct subtypes, namely, SCLC-A, SCLC-N, SCLC-P, and SCLC-I. These groups are readily detectable by immunohistochemistry and also have potential predictive utility for emerging therapies, including PARPi, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and DLL3 targeted therapies. In contrast with their histology, studies have identified that SCLCs display both inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Identification of subpopulations of cells with high expression of PLCG2 has been linked with risk of metastasis. SCLCs also display subtype switching under therapy pressure which may contribute furthermore to metastatic ability and chemoresistance. In this review, we summarize the recent developments in the understanding of the biology of SCLCs, and discuss the potential diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment opportunities the four proposed subtypes may present for the future. We also discuss the emerging evidence of tumor heterogeneity and plasticity in SCLCs which have been implicated in metastasis and acquired therapeutic resistance seen in these aggressive tumors.

Diagnostic endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in patients with suspected myocarditis helps to direct therapy and guide prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the 2007 clinical guideline indications for EMB and the presence of a diagnostic biopsy result and associated outcomes in patients with suspected myocarditis in a national quaternary referral center in a contemporary cohort. All cases of suspected myocarditis referred to the National Cardiac Transplant Centre who underwent EMB between 2009 and 2019 were identified retrospectively through pathology records. Outcomes including subsequent need for inotrope and/or mechanical circulatory support (MCS), heart transplantation and in-hospital mortality were recorded. In total, 25 (68% male, mean age of 45 ± 15 years) EMBs were performed for this indication across this time period, 64% (n = 16) of which demonstrated diagnostic results, the majority (75%, n = 12) identifying acute lymphocytic myocarditis, 13% (n = 2) giant cell, one patient (6.3%) eosinophilic and one (6.3%) an immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis. The majority of those with histologically confirmed myocarditis had a Class I or IIa guideline indication for EMB (n = 12, 75%). The remaining 4 patients (25%), either met Class IIb criteria (n = 2) or would not have been accounted for in this guideline. The majority of patients requiring inotropes and/or MCS (n = 9/11), and/or heart transplant (n = 3/4), or who later died (n = 4/5) were in the diagnostic biopsy group. In this 10-year National referral sample, 75% of patients with histologically confirmed myocarditis had a Class I or IIa indication for EMB, reinforcing the usefulness of traditional guidelines in this contemporary era. However, 25% of patients with a subsequent confirmed histological diagnosis had either none or a less well-established indication for EMB, highlighting the need for clinical suspicion outside of accepted clinical scenarios.

Original Article USO1 expression is dysregulated in non-small cell lung cancer Anna Keogh, Lisa Ryan, Mutaz M. Nur, Anne-Marie Baird, Siobhan Nicholson, Sinéad Cuffe, Gerard J. Fitzmaurice, Ronan Ryan, Vincent K. Young, Stephen P. Finn, Steven G. Gray

Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP) are showing promise in many biomedical applications. One of these- magnetic hyperthermia-utilizes externally applied alternating magnetic fields and tumor-residing magnetic nanoparticles to generate localized therapeutic temperature elevations. Magnetic hyperthermia is approved in Europe to treat glioblastoma and is undergoing clinical assessment in the United States to treat prostate cancer. In this study, we performed biodistribution and histological analysis of a new IONP (RCL-01) in Wistar rats. These nanoparticles are currently undergoing clinical assessment in locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to determine the feasibility of magnetic hyperthermia treatment in this disease. The study presented here aimed to determine the fate of these nanoparticles in vivo and whether this results in organ damage. Wistar rats were injected intravenously with relatively high doses of IONP (30 mg(Fe)/kg, 45 mg(Fe)/kg and 60 mg(Fe)/kg) and compared to a vehicle control to determine the accumulation of iron in organs and whether this resulted in histological changes in these tissues. Dose-dependent increases of iron were observed in the liver, spleen and lungs of IONP-treated animals at 7 days postinjection; however, this did not result in significant histological changes in these tissues. Immunofluorescent imaging determined these nanoparticles are internalized by macrophages in tissue, suggesting they are readily phagocytosed by the reticuloendothelial system for eventual recycling. Notably, no changes in iron or dextran staining were found in the kidneys across all treatment groups, providing evidence for potential renal clearance.

Purpose: Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and microsatellite instability are predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response. The best approach to identify patients with such tumors is unclear in prostate cancer. Experimental Design: This study included 1,016 men diagnosed with primary prostate cancer during prospective follow-up of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Physicians’ Health Study. The highest-grade/index lesions from radical prostatectomy (95%) or transurethral resections of the prostate were mounted on tissue microarrays. Scoring of immunohistochemistry for the MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 required a nontumor internal positive control for designating deficiency. Validation was done on full sections and with PCR-based quantification of microsatellite repeats. Results: Tumor stage was predominantly pathologically localized with a full distribution of Gleason scores. MMR tumor scoring could be performed with available internal positive control tissue in 75% to 90% of cases, depending on the MMR protein. Of the 903 tumors evaluable for MSH2 protein loss, 4 tumors had loss of MSH2 (prevalence, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2%–1.1%), and 3 of 708 evaluable tumors had concomitant loss of MSH6 (prevalence, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1%–1.2%). No tumor had loss of MLH1 or PMS2. The four MMR-deficient cases had higher Gleason scores, and three had non-zero microsatellite repeats. Conclusions: In this nationwide prospective study, MMR deficiency was rare in primary, surgically treated prostate cancer. The low prevalence and the need for an internal positive control for this assay are feasibility concerns for unselected routine immunohistochemistry-based screening for MMR deficiency on limited tissue specimens, such as prostate biopsies.