Ivan Norscia

Prof. Dr. Ivan Norscia

Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EPElisabetta Palagi
Elisabetta Palagi
ACAlessia Celeghin
Alessia Celeghin
MTMarco Tamietto
Marco Tamietto
PWPiotr Winkielman
Piotr Winkielman
INIvan Norscia
Ivan Norscia

7 December 2011 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
INIvan Norscia
Ivan Norscia
Elisabetta PalagiElisabetta Palagi
Elisabetta Palagi
The ability to share others' emotions, or empathy, is crucial for complex social interactions. Clinical, psychological, and neurobiological clues suggest a link between yawn contagion and empathy in humans (Homo sapiens). However, no behavioral evidence has been provided so far. We tested the effect of different variables (e.g., country of origin, sex, yawn characteristics) on yawn contagion by running mixed models applied to observational data collected over 1 year on adult (>16 years old) human subjects. Only social bonding predicted the occurrence, frequency, and latency of yawn contagion. As with other measures of empathy, the rate of contagion was greatest in response to kin, then friends, then acquaintances, and lastly strangers. Related individuals (r≥0.25) showed the greatest contagion, in terms of both occurrence of yawning and frequency of yawns. Strangers and acquaintances showed a longer delay in the yawn response (latency) compared to friends and kin. This outcome suggests that the neuronal activation magnitude related to yawn contagion can differ as a function of subject familiarity. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that yawn contagion is primarily driven by the emotional closeness between individuals and not by other variables, such as gender and nationality.

12 August 2014 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Elisabetta PalagiElisabetta Palagi
Elisabetta Palagi
INIvan Norscia
Ivan Norscia
EDElisa Demuru
Elisa Demuru
In humans and apes, yawn contagion echoes emotional contagion, the basal layer of empathy. Hence, yawn contagion is a unique tool to compare empathy across species. If humans are the most empathic animal species, they should show the highest empathic response also at the level of emotional contagion. We gathered data on yawn contagion in humans (Homo sapiens) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) by applying the same observational paradigm and identical operational definitions. We selected a naturalistic approach because experimental management practices can produce different psychological and behavioural biases in the two species, and differential attention to artificial stimuli. Within species, yawn contagion was highest between strongly bonded subjects. Between species, sensitivity to others' yawns was higher in humans than in bonobos when involving kin and friends but was similar when considering weakly-bonded subjects. Thus, emotional contagion is not always highest in humans. The cognitive components concur in empowering emotional affinity between individuals. Yet, when they are not in play, humans climb down from the empathic podium to return to the "understory", which our species shares with apes.

16 December 2009 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJoerg U. Ganzhorn
Joerg U. Ganzhorn
SASummer Arrigo-Nelson
Summer Arrigo-Nelson
SBSue Boinski
Sue Boinski
ABAn Bollen
An Bollen
VCValentina Carrai
Valentina Carrai
PWPatricia C. Wright
Patricia C. Wright
The ecological factors contributing to the evolution of tropical vertebrate communities are still poorly understood. Primate communities of the tropical Americas have fewer folivorous but more frugivorous genera than tropical regions of the Old World and especially many more frugivorous genera than Madagascar. Reasons for this phenomenon are largely unexplored. We developed the hypothesis that Neotropical fruits have higher protein concentrations than fruits from Madagascar and that the higher representation of frugivorous genera in the Neotropics is linked to high protein concentrations in fruits. Low fruit protein concentrations in Madagascar would restrict the evolution of frugivores in Malagasy communities. We reviewed the literature for nitrogen concentrations in fruits from the Neotropics and from Madagascar, and analyzed fruits from an additional six sites in the Neotropics and six sites in Madagascar. Fruits from the Neotropical sites contain significantly more nitrogen than fruits from the Madagascar sites. Nitrogen concentrations in New World fruits are above the concentrations to satisfy nitrogen requirements of primates, while they are at the lower end or below the concentrations to cover primate protein needs in Madagascar. Fruits at most sites in the Neotropics contain enough protein to satisfy the protein needs of primates. Thus, selection pressure to develop new adaptations for foods that are difficult to digest (such as leaves) may have been lower in the Neotropics than in Madagascar. The low nitrogen concentrations in fruits from Madagascar may contribute to the almost complete absence of frugivorous primate species on this island.

8 September 2006 in International Journal of Primatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
INIvan Norscia
Ivan Norscia
VCValentina Carrai
Valentina Carrai
SBSilvana M. Borgognini-Tarli
Silvana M. Borgognini-Tarli