David Sanford

Dr. David Sanford


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 August 2022 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRyan J. Stubbins
Ryan J. Stubbins
AFAnnabel Francis
Annabel Francis
FKFlorian Kuchenbauer
Florian Kuchenbauer
DSDavid Sanford
David Sanford
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy that most frequently develops in older adults. Overall, AML is associated with a high mortality although advancements in genetic risk stratification and new treatments are leading to improvements in outcomes for some subgroups. In this review, we discuss an individualized approach to intensive therapy with a focus on the role of recently approved novel therapies as well as the selection of post-remission therapies for patients in first remission. We discuss the management of patients with relapsed and refractory AML, including the role of targeted treatment and allogeneic stem cell transplant. Next, we review non-intensive treatment for older and unfit AML patients including the use of azacitidine and venetoclax. Finally, we discuss the integration of palliative care in the management of patients with AML.


4 February 2022 in European Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRyan J. Stubbins
Ryan J. Stubbins
MSMaria Stamenkovic
Maria Stamenkovic
CRClaudie Roy
Claudie Roy
JRJudith Rodrigo
Judith Rodrigo
SCShanee Chung
Shanee Chung
DSDavid Sanford
David Sanford

1 November 2018 in Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WLWasithep Limvorapitak
Wasithep Limvorapitak
MBMichael J. Barnett
Michael J. Barnett
DHDonna E. Hogge
Donna E. Hogge
DFDonna L. Forrest
Donna L. Forrest
TNThomas J. Nevill
Thomas J. Nevill
DSDavid Sanford
David Sanford

24 February 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSScott R. Solomon
Scott R. Solomon
BPBayard L. Powell
Bayard L. Powell
JKJamie Koprivnikar
Jamie Koprivnikar
CLCatherine Lai
Catherine Lai
HMHeather Male
Heather Male
Roland Bruno WalterRoland Bruno Walter
Roland Bruno Walter
This open-label phase 1 study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03555955) assessed CPX-351 pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with hematologic malignancies with normal or impaired renal function. Patients were enrolled into three cohorts based on their creatinine clearance (CrCl): ≥90 mL/min (Cohort 1, normal renal function, n = 7), 30 to <59 mL/min (Cohort 2, moderate renal impairment, n = 8), or <30 mL/min (Cohort 3, severe renal impairment, n = 6). Patients received intravenous CPX-351 for initial induction; blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis. The primary objective was to assess the PK parameters for cytarabine, daunorubicin, and their respective metabolites, arabinosyluracil (Ara-U) and daunorubicinol. Renal impairment did not significantly impact the cytarabine, daunorubicin, or daunorubicinol exposure, but it caused a slight increase in the Ara-U exposure. The CPX-351 side effect profile was similar in patients with impaired renal function compared to those with normal renal function. All the patients reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most commonly febrile neutropenia and nausea (57% each) and hyperglycemia (43%); no patients discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. These data suggest that CPX-351 dose adjustment is not required for patients with hematologic malignancies with moderate or severe renal impairment.

22 September 2022 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDavid Sanford
David Sanford
PDPierre Desjardins
Pierre Desjardins
BLBrian Leber
Brian Leber
KPKristjan Paulson
Kristjan Paulson
Sarit AssoulineSarit Assouline
Sarit Assouline
HLHeather A. Leitch
Heather A. Leitch
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy that predominantly affects the elderly. Prognosis declines with age. For those who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy, historically established treatment options have been hypomethylating agents (HMAs), low dose cytarabine (LDAC), and best supportive care (BSC). As the standard of care evolves for those unfit for intensive chemotherapy, there is a need to understand established treatment pathways, clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in Canada. The CURRENT study was a retrospective chart review of AML patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy who initiated first-line treatment between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. Data were collected from 170 Canadian patients treated at six hematology centers, of whom 118 received systemic therapy and 52 received BSC as first-line treatment. Median overall survival was 8.58 months and varied from 2.96 months for BSC to 13.31 months for HMAs. Over 80% of patients had at least one outpatient visit, and 67% of patients receiving systemic therapy and 71% of those receiving BSC had at least one admission to hospital, during their first line of therapy. A total of 96 (81.4%) patients receiving first line systemic therapy and 39 (75.0%) of those receiving first line BSC had at least one red blood cell or platelet transfusion. These findings highlight the unmet need for novel therapies for patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.