James R Eshleman

Dr. James R Eshleman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 July 2017 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDung T. Le
Dung T. Le
JDJennifer N. Durham
Jennifer N. Durham
KSKellie N. Smith
Kellie N. Smith
HWHao Wang
Hao Wang
BBBjarne R. Bartlett
Bjarne R. Bartlett
LDLuis A. Diaz
Luis A. Diaz
Predicting responses to immunotherapy: Colon cancers with loss-of-function mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway have favorable responses to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy. In a phase 2 clinical trial, Le et al. showed that treatment success is not just limited to colon cancer (see the Perspective by Goswami and Sharma). They found that a wide range of different cancer types with MMR deficiency also responded to PD-1 blockade. The trial included some patients with pancreatic cancer, which is one of the deadliest forms of cancer. The clinical trial is still ongoing, and around 20% of patients have so far achieved a complete response. MMR deficiency appears to be a biomarker for predicting successful treatment outcomes for several solid tumors and indicates a new therapeutic option for patients harboring MMR-deficient cancers. Science , this issue p. 409 ; see also p. 358

14 February 2016 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJonathan C. Dudley
Jonathan C. Dudley
MLMing-Tseh Lin
Ming-Tseh Lin
DLDung T. Le
Dung T. Le
JEJames R Eshleman
James R Eshleman
Initial results by Le and colleagues, which were published in the June 25, 2015 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, report significant responses of cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI) to anti–PD-1 inhibitors in patients who failed conventional therapy. This finding fits into a broader body of research associating somatic hypermutation and neoepitope formation with response to immunotherapy, with the added benefit of relying on a simple, widely used diagnostic test. This review surveys the pathogenesis and prognostic value of MSI, diagnostic guidelines for detecting it, and the frequency of MSI across tumors, with the goal of providing a reference for its use as a biomarker for PD-1 blockade. MSI usually arises from either germline mutations in components of the mismatch repair (MMR) machinery (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2) in patients with Lynch syndrome or somatic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. The result is a cancer with a 10- to 100-fold increase in mutations, associated in the colon with poor differentiation, an intense lymphocytic infiltrate, and a superior prognosis. Diagnostic approaches have evolved since the early 1990s, from relying exclusively on clinical criteria to incorporating pathologic features, PCR-based MSI testing, and immunohistochemistry for loss of MMR component expression. Tumor types can be grouped into categories based on the frequency of MSI, from colorectal (20%) and endometrial (22%–33%) to cervical (8%) and esophageal (7%) to skin and breast cancers (0%–2%). If initial results are validated, MSI testing could have an expanded role as a tool in the armamentarium of precision medicine. Clin Cancer Res; 22(4); 813–20. ©2016 AACR.

15 August 2019 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VGVincent P. Groot
Vincent P. Groot
SMStacy Mosier
Stacy Mosier
Ammar Asrar JavedAmmar Asrar Javed
Ammar Asrar Javed
JTJonathan A. Teinor
Jonathan A. Teinor
GGGeorgios Gemenetzis
Georgios Gemenetzis
JEJames R Eshleman
James R Eshleman
Purpose: In research settings, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shows promise as a tumor-specific biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to perform analytical and clinical validation of a KRAS ctDNA assay in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) and College of American Pathology–certified clinical laboratory. Experimental Design: Digital-droplet PCR was used to detect the major PDAC-associated somatic KRAS mutations (G12D, G12V, G12R, and Q61H) in liquid biopsies. For clinical validation, 290 preoperative and longitudinal postoperative plasma samples were collected from 59 patients with PDAC. The utility of ctDNA status to predict PDAC recurrence during follow-up was assessed. Results: ctDNA was detected preoperatively in 29 (49%) patients and was an independent predictor of decreased recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy were less likely to have preoperative ctDNA than were chemo-naïve patients (21% vs. 69%; P < 0.001). ctDNA levels dropped significantly after tumor resection. Persistence of ctDNA in the immediate postoperative period was associated with a high rate of recurrence and poor median RFS (5 months). ctDNA detected during follow-up predicted clinical recurrence [sensitivity 90% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74%–98%), specificity 88% (95% CI, 62%–98%)] with a median lead time of 84 days (interquartile range, 25–146). Detection of ctDNA during postpancreatectomy follow-up was associated with a median OS of 17 months, while median OS was not yet reached at 30 months for patients without ctDNA (P = 0.011). Conclusions: Measurement of KRAS ctDNA in a CLIA laboratory setting can be used to predict recurrence and survival in patients with PDAC.

19 January 2016 in Cancer Biology & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ANAlexis L. Norris
Alexis L. Norris
RWRachael E. Workman
Rachael E. Workman
YFYunfan Fan
Yunfan Fan
JEJames R Eshleman
James R Eshleman
WTWinston Timp
Winston Timp
Despite advances in sequencing, structural variants (SVs) remain difficult to reliably detect due to the short read length (<300 bp) of 2nd generation sequencing. Not only do the reads (or paired-end reads) need to straddle a breakpoint, but repetitive elements often lead to ambiguities in the alignment of short reads. We propose to use the long-reads (up to 20 kb) possible with 3rd generation sequencing, specifically nanopore sequencing on the MinION. Nanopore sequencing relies on a similar concept to a Coulter counter, reading the DNA sequence from the change in electrical current resulting from a DNA strand being forced through a nanometer-sized pore embedded in a membrane. Though nanopore sequencing currently has a relatively high mismatch rate that precludes base substitution and small frameshift mutation detection, its accuracy is sufficient for SV detection because of its long reads. In fact, long reads in some cases may improve SV detection efficiency. We have tested nanopore sequencing to detect a series of well-characterized SVs, including large deletions, inversions, and translocations that inactivate the CDKN2A/p16 and SMAD4/DPC4 tumor suppressor genes in pancreatic cancer. Using PCR amplicon mixes, we have demonstrated that nanopore sequencing can detect large deletions, translocations and inversions at dilutions as low as 1:100, with as few as 500 reads per sample. Given the speed, small footprint, and low capital cost, nanopore sequencing could become the ideal tool for the low-level detection of cancer-associated SVs needed for molecular relapse, early detection, or therapeutic monitoring.

5 August 2014 in Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GCGuoli Chen
Guoli Chen
SMStacy Mosier
Stacy Mosier
CGChristopher D. Gocke
Christopher D. Gocke
MLMing-Tseh Lin
Ming-Tseh Lin
JEJames R Eshleman
James R Eshleman

24 October 2015 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GZGang Zheng
Gang Zheng
LTLi-Hui Tseng
Li-Hui Tseng
GCGuoli Chen
Guoli Chen
LHLisa Haley
Lisa Haley
PIPeter Illei
Peter Illei
MLMing-Tseh Lin
Ming-Tseh Lin
Selective BRAF inhibitors, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, and the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, have been approved for treatment of metastatic melanomas with a BRAF p.V600E mutation. The clinical significance of non-codon 600 mutations remains unclear, in part, due to variation of kinase activity for different mutants. In this study, we categorized BRAF mutations according to the reported mutant kinase activity. A total of 1027 lung cancer, colorectal cancer or melanoma specimens were submitted for clinical mutation detection by next generation sequencing. Non-codon 600 mutations were observed in 37 % of BRAF-mutated tumors. Of all BRAF mutants, 75 % were kinase-activated, 15 % kinase-impaired and 10 % kinase-unknown. The most common kinase-impaired mutant involves codon 594, specifically, p.D594G (c.1781A > G) and p.D594N (c.1780G > A). Lung cancers showed significantly higher incidences of kinase-impaired or kinase-unknown mutants. Kinase-impaired BRAF mutants showed a significant association with concomitant activating KRAS or NRAS mutations, but not PIK3CA mutations, supporting the reported interaction of these mutations. BRAF mutants with impaired or unknown kinase activity as well as concomitant kinase-impaired BRAF mutations and RAS mutations were detected in lung cancers, colorectal cancers and melanomas. Different therapeutic strategies based on the BRAF mutant kinase activity and the concomitant mutations may be worthwhile.