Depending on their extent, burn injuries require different treatment strategies. In cases of severe large-area trauma, the availability of vital skin for autografting is limited. Donor skin allografts are a well-established but rarely standardized option for temporary wound coverage. Ten patients were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Overall, 202 donor skin grafts obtained from the in-house skin bank were applied in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna. Between 2017 and 2022, we analysed the results in patient treatment, the selection of skin donors, tissue procurement, tissue processing and storage of allografts, as well as the condition and morphology of the allografts before application. The average Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) was 8.5 (range, 5–12), and the mean affected total body surface area (TBSA) was 46.1% (range, 20–80%). In total, allograft application was performed 14 times. In two cases, a total of eight allografts were removed due to local infection, accounting for 3.96% of skin grafts. Six patients survived the acute phase of treatment. Scanning electron microscope images and histology showed no signs of scaffold decomposition and intact tissue layers of the allografts. The skin banking program and the application of skin allografts at the Vienna Burn Center can be considered successful. In severe burn injuries, skin allografts provide time by serving as sufficient wound coverage after early necrosectomy. Having an in-house skin banking program at a dedicated burn centre is particularly advantageous since issues of availability and distribution can be minimized. Skin allografts provide a reliable treatment option in patients with extensive burn injuries.

Removal of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (bPNST) represents a surgical challenge. The morphological relation of bPNST and healthy nerve fascicles are of utmost importance for achieving both removal of the entire tumor and preservation of functional integrity of the peripheral nerve. Thus, we intraoperatively assessed the morphological patterns between bPNST and nerve fascicles using photo documentation obtained between January 2009 and September 2021. In 31 patients (20 women and 11 men) with a mean age of 48 ± 18 years a total of 34 bPNST were removed. Four constant morphological patterns between bPNST relatively to nerve fascicles were detected: (1) bPNST is located peripherally (n = 16), (2) it splits the nerve into two main fascicles (n = 5), (3) it totally splits up the nerve out of the nerve’s center (n = 8) und (4) it encloses the nerve and its fascicles (n = 5) without any detectable boundary layer. Histology revealed 28 schwannomas, five neurofibromas, and one perineurioma. The proposed classification reflects the increasing complexity of tumor removal with a higher type number. This might be beneficial for preoperative diagnostics, i.e., high-resolution ultrasound or MRI-tractography, as well as for planning the bPNST’s surgical resection and the possible need for nerve reconstruction.

Background/Objectives: Vascularized bone grafts have been successfully established for complex bone defects. The integration of three-dimensional (3D) simulation and printing technology may aid in more precise surgical planning and intraoperative bone shaping. The purpose of the present study was to describe the implementation and surgical application of this innovative technology for bone reconstruction. Methods: This prospective pilot study was conducted between June 2019 and June 2024. For this evaluation, patients who received vascularized bone reconstruction assisted with 3D technology were included. For reconstruction, the free medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap was used as the vascularized bone graft. Patient-specific 3D-printed templates, based on individual 3D simulations according to defect characteristics, were used for surgical planning, including flap elevation, shaping and inset. Results: A total of six patients (five male) with an average age of 39 years (range 19–62 years) and a mean follow-up time of 15 months (range 5–24 months) were analysed. The indications were as follows: avascular necrosis of the carpal bones, a metacarpal defect after tumor resection and pseudoarthrosis after a fractured ulna. Three patients received an osteochondral and three patients received a cortico-cancellous MFC flap. Conclusions: Our evaluation of clinical application revealed enhanced preoperative planning as well as intraoperative performance. Although the implementation for this technology is challenging, the new insights gained in planning and surgical guidance have led us to incorporate this technology into our standard routine.