The pH and calcium ion release of three root canal sealers--Sealapex, Sealer 26, and Apexit--were assessed at 24 and 48 hr, and at 7 and 30 days after spatulation. After manipulation, the sealers were placed in 1-cm-long tubes measuring 4 mm in diameter and immersed in a glass flask containing 10 ml of deionized water, which was hermetically sealed and stored at 37 degrees C. The tubes were removed at the scheduled times and the water in which they were immersed was tested for pH with a pHmeter and for released calcium by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Starting 48 hr after immersion, Selapex produced an alklaine pH and released significantly higher calcium amounts compared with the other two sealers, with even more pronounced results after 30 days. On the basis of the results obtained, we conclude that Sealapex presented the highest calcium and hydroxyl release, especially after longer time intervals, whereas Sealer 26 showed highest release during the initial periods (i.e. during its setting time). Apexit presented the least satisfactory results.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on the bond strength of three commercially available endodontic sealers (MTA Fillapex, Sealapex, and AH Plus) to root canal dentin. Sixty slices of extracted human canines were obtained from cervical, middle, and apical root thirds. Root canals were standardized and specimens were filled and divided into six groups (n = 10): G1, MTA Fillapex; G2, Sealapex; and G3, AH Plus, with prior application of calcium hydroxide dressing; and G4, G5 and G6, without prior application of intracanal dressing. After 7 days, specimens were submitted to a push-out test. The data obtained were analyzed using the ANOVA and Tukey tests (a = 5%). Fracture modes were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The results of sealer bond strength to root canal dentin varied according to the sealer, root third and prior dressing application. Overall, calcium hydroxide dressing reduced bond strength in all root thirds, but the reduction was significant only for AH Plus, at the cervical (3.25 ± 1.69) and apical (4.43 ± 1.65) thirds (p < 0.05). AH Plus showed the highest bond strength for all root thirds (p < 0.05) compared to the other groups. G1, G2, G4 and G5 showed similar bond strength values for all root thirds (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the calcium hydroxide dressing only had a negative effect on the bond strength of AH Plus, at the cervical and apical thirds. On the other hand, the bond strength values for MTA Fillapex and Sealapex were lower than those for AH Plus and, whereas the mixed failure mode predominated for AH Plus, the adhesive failure mode predominated for MTA Fillapex and Sealapex.