Lucia Mangone

Dr. Lucia Mangone

Epidemiology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2006 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEugenio Paci
Eugenio Paci
GMGuido Miccinesi
Guido Miccinesi
DPDonella Puliti
Donella Puliti
PBPaola Baldazzi
Paola Baldazzi
VLVincenzo De Lisi
Vincenzo De Lisi
MZManuel Zorzi
Manuel Zorzi
Introduction: Excess of incidence rates is the expected consequence of service screening. The aim of this paper is to estimate the quota attributable to overdiagnosis in the breast cancer screening programmes in Northern and Central Italy. Methods: All patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 50 and 74 years who were resident in screening areas in the six years before and five years after the start of the screening programme were included. We calculated a corrected-for-lead-time number of observed cases for each calendar year. The number of observed incident cases was reduced by the number of screen-detected cases in that year and incremented by the estimated number of screen-detected cases that would have arisen clinically in that year. Results: In total we included 13,519 and 13,999 breast cancer cases diagnosed in the pre-screening and screening years, respectively. In total, the excess ratio of observed to predicted in situ and invasive cases was 36.2%. After correction for lead time the excess ratio was 4.6% (95% confidence interval 2 to 7%) and for invasive cases only it was 3.2% (95% confidence interval 1 to 6%). Conclusion: The remaining excess of cancers after individual correction for lead time was lower than 5%.

12 May 2021 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lucia MangoneLucia Mangone
Lucia Mangone
CPCarmine Pinto
Carmine Pinto
PMPamela Mancuso
Pamela Mancuso
MOMarta Ottone
Marta Ottone
IBIsabella Bisceglia
Isabella Bisceglia
PRPaolo Giorgi Rossi
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Background: Right-sided colorectal cancer (CRC) has worse survival than does left-sided CRC. The objective of this study was to further assess the impact of right-side location on survival and the role of the extent of lymphadenectomy. Methods: All CRCs diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy, were included. Data for stage, grade, histology, screening history, and number of removed lymph nodes (LN) were collected. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR), with relative 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), of right vs. left colon and of removing < 12, 12–21 or > 21 lymph nodes by cancer site. Results: During the study period, 29,358 patients were registered (8828 right colon, 18,852 left colon, 1678 transverse). Patients with right cancer were more often older, females, with advanced stage and high grade, and higher number of removed LNs. Five-year survival was lower in the right than in the left colon (55.2% vs 59.7%). In multivariable analysis, right colon showed a lower survival when adjusting for age, sex, and screening status (HR 1.12, 95%CI 1.04–1.21). Stratification by number of lymph nodes removed (12–21 or > 21) was associated with better survival in right colon (HR 0.54, 95%CI 0.40–0.72 and HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.30–0.55, respectively) compared to left colon (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.76–1.06 and HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.69–1.01, respectively). Conclusions: This study confirms that right CRC has worse survival; the association is not due to screening status. An adequate removal of lymph nodes is associated with better survival, although the direction of the association in terms of causal links is not clear.

9 February 2018 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGStefano Guzzinati
Stefano Guzzinati
SVSaverio Virdone
Saverio Virdone
RARoberta De Angelis
Roberta De Angelis
CPChiara Panato
Chiara Panato
CBCarlotta Buzzoni
Carlotta Buzzoni
LMLuigino DAL MASO
Luigino DAL MASO
Background: Estimates of cancer prevalence are widely based on limited duration, often including patients living after a cancer diagnosis made in the previous 5 years and less frequently on complete prevalence (i.e., including all patients regardless of the time elapsed since diagnosis). This study aims to provide estimates of complete cancer prevalence in Italy by sex, age, and time since diagnosis for all cancers combined, and for selected cancer types. Projections were made up to 2020, overall and by time since diagnosis. Methods: Data were from 27 Italian population-based cancer registries, covering 32% of the Italian population, able to provide at least 7 years of registration as of December 2009 and follow-up of vital status as of December 2013. The data were used to compute the limited-duration prevalence, in order to estimate the complete prevalence by means of the COMPREV software. Results: In 2010, 2,637,975 persons were estimated to live in Italy after a cancer diagnosis, 1.2 million men and 1.4 million women, or 4.6% of the Italian population. A quarter of male prevalent cases had prostate cancer (n = 305,044), while 42% of prevalent women had breast cancer (n = 604,841). More than 1.5 million people (2.7% of Italians) were alive since 5 or more years after diagnosis and 20% since ≥15 years. It is projected that, in 2020 in Italy, there will be 3.6 million prevalent cancer cases (+ 37% vs 2010). The largest 10-year increases are foreseen for prostate (+ 85%) and for thyroid cancers (+ 79%), and for long-term survivors diagnosed since 20 or more years (+ 45%). Among the population aged ≥75 years, 22% will have had a previous cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: The number of persons living after a cancer diagnosis is estimated to rise of approximately 3% per year in Italy. The availability of detailed estimates and projections of the complete prevalence are intended to help the implementation of guidelines aimed to enhance the long-term follow-up of cancer survivors and to contribute their rehabilitation needs.

31 October 2022 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Lucia MangoneLucia Mangone
Lucia Mangone
FMFrancesco Marinelli
Francesco Marinelli
IBIsabella Bisceglia
Isabella Bisceglia
MBMaria Barbara Braghiroli
Maria Barbara Braghiroli
ADAngela Damato
Angela Damato
CPCarmine Pinto
Carmine Pinto
The aim of this study is to present the 5-year relative survival by stage of breast and colorectal cancer patients in a northern Italian province. For the period 2013-2015, cases were selected from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Breast cancer patients were divided into 3 age groups: <45, 45-74 (the target screening population) and 74+. Colorectal cancers patients were classified into <50, 50-69 (the target screening population), and over 69 years. Carcinomas in situ and unknown stage were both excluded from the survival analyses. The five-year relative survival was estimated using the Pohar Perme method. During the period examined, 1,450 breast cancers and 992 colorectal cancer cases were registered. Analyzing in detail the patients with breast cancer for the entire 2013-2015 period, we noted that 50.4% were in stage I, 33.6% in stage II, 10.8% in stage III and 3.8% in stage IV. The stage was unknown in only 1.3% of patients (19 cases). The stage data of patients with colorectal cancer showed 24.5% were in stage I, 26.1% in stage II, 23.4% in stage III, and 24.6% in stage IV, and 1.4% unknown. Breast cancer 5-year survival was 100%, 89.7%, 71.4%, and 29.1% for stages I, II, III and IV, respectively and for colon cancer 96.7%, 83.4%, 70.8% and 16.2%, respectively.The presence of cancer screening, associated with effective treatments, account for the high survival rate of early-stage breast and colon cancers.

30 April 2013 in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFrancesca Bella
Francesca Bella
PMPamela Minicozzi
Pamela Minicozzi
AGAdriano Giacomin
Adriano Giacomin
Emanuele CrocettiEmanuele Crocetti
Emanuele Crocetti
MFMassimo Federico
Massimo Federico
MSMilena Sant
Milena Sant

1 September 2018 in Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMassimo Vicentini
Massimo Vicentini
PBPaola Ballotari
Paola Ballotari
PRPaolo Giorgi Rossi
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
FVFrancesco Venturelli
Francesco Venturelli
CSClaudio Sacchettini
Claudio Sacchettini
VMValeria Manicardi
Valeria Manicardi