Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated systems (Cas) are efficient tools for targeting specific genes for laboratory research, agricultural engineering, biotechnology, and human disease treatment. Cas9, by far the most extensively used gene-editing nuclease, has shown great promise for the treatment of hereditary diseases, viral infection, cancers, and so on. Recent reports have revealed that some other types of CRISPR-Cas systems may also have surprising potential to join the fray as gene-editing tools for various applications. Despite the rapid progress in basic research and clinical tests, some underlying problems present continuous, significant challenges, such as editing efficiency, relative difficulty in delivery, off-target effects, immunogenicity, etc. This article summarizes the applications of CRISPR-Cas from bench to bedside and highlights the current obstacles that may limit the usage of CRISPR-Cas systems as gene-editing toolkits in precision medicine and offer some viewpoints that may help to tackle these challenges and facilitate technical development. CRISPR-Cas systems, as a powerful gene-editing approach, will offer great hopes in clinical treatments for many individuals with currently incurable diseases.

During embryonic morphogenesis, wound repair and cancer invasion, cells often migrate collectively via tight cell-cell junctions, a process named coll

Introduction: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) expression appears to be a promising marker of bacterial infections. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy of nCD64 expression for the diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill adult patients. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library for literature published between database inception and 19 May 2014, as well as reference lists of identified primary studies. Studies were included if they included assessment of the accuracy of nCD64 expression for sepsis diagnosis in adult patients and provided sufficient information to construct a 2×2 contingency table. Results: A total of 8 studies comprising 1986 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.78) and 0.85 (95 % CI, 0.82–0.87), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 8.15 (95 % CI, 3.82–17.36), 0.16 (95 % CI, 0.09–0.30), and 60.41 (95 % CI, 15.87–229.90), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of nCD64 expression with Q* value were 0.95 (Q* =0.89). Conclusions: On the basis of our meta-analysis, nCD64 expression is a helpful marker for early diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients. The results of the test should not be used alone to diagnose sepsis, but instead should be interpreted in combination with medical history, physical examination, and other test results.

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems in bacteria and archaea provide adaptive immunity against invading foreign nucleic acids. Previous studies suggest that certain bacteria employ their Type II CRISPR-Cas systems to target their own genes, thus evading host immunity. However, whether other CRISPR-Cas systems have similar functions during bacterial invasion of host cells remains unknown. Here we identify a novel role for Type I CRISPR-Cas systems in evading host defenses in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain UCBPP-PA14. The Type I CRISPR-Cas system of PA14 targets the mRNA of the bacterial quorum-sensing regulator LasR to dampen the recognition by toll-like receptor 4, thus diminishing the pro-inflammatory responses of the host in cell and mouse models. Mechanistically, this nuclease-mediated RNA degradation requires a “5′-GGN-3′” recognition motif in the target mRNA, and HD and DExD/H domains in Cas3 of the Type I CRISPR-Cas system. As LasR and Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are ubiquitously present in bacteria, our findings elucidate an important common mechanism underlying bacterial virulence.

Feedback inhibition of the microRNA decoy activity of lncRNA MEG3 tempers inflammation during lung infection.