Backgrounds: Bevacizumab (BVZ) is used as a subsequent line of treatment for pediatric optic pathway glioma (OPG) in the case of progression. Data on the treatment effect concerning tumor progression and visual function are scarce and nationwide studies are lacking. Methods: We performed a retrospective, nationwide, multicentre cohort study including all pediatric patients with OPG treated with BVZ in the Netherlands (2009–2021). Progression-free survival, change in visual acuity and visual field, MRI-based radiologic response, and toxicity were evaluated. Results: In total, 33 pediatric patients with OPG were treated with BVZ (median 12 months). Visual acuity improved in 20.5%, remained stable in 74.4%, and decreased in 5.1% of 39 of all analysed eyes. The monocular visual field improved in 73.1%, remained stable in 15.4%, and decreased in 7.7% of 25 analysed eyes. Radiologic response at the end of therapy showed a partial response in 7 patients (21.9%), minor response in 7 (21.9%), stable disease in 15 (46.9%), and progressive disease in 3 (9.3%). Progression-free survival at 18 and 36 months after the start of BVZ reduced from 70.9% to 38.0%. Toxicity (≥grade 3 CTCAE) during treatment was observed in five patients (15.2%). Conclusion: Treatment of BVZ in pediatric patients with OPG revealed stabilisation in the majority of patients, but was followed by progression at a later time point in more than 60% of patients. This profile seems relatively acceptable given the benefits of visual field improvement in more than 70% of analysed eyes and visual acuity improvement in more than 20% of eyes at the cessation of BVZ.

Aims The risk to develop adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is high for paediatric patients. This is, amongst other reasons, due to the inevitable use of off-label and unlicensed medicines. Moreover, there is limited knowledge on ADRs in children. Thus, adequate recognition may be challenging. The lack of dedicated studies and the voluntary nature of pharmacovigilance systems used to gain insight into the characteristics of ADRs contribute to this problem. The goal of this study is to identify whether ADRs in paediatric patients are adequately documented by the medical team and whether they are subsequently reported to the national pharmacovigilance system. Methods All patients admitted to the paediatric medium care of the Radboudumc Amalia Children’s hospital during 1 month, and using one or more drugs, were included. Two researchers analysed retrospectively and independently the number of possible ADRs in the medical records. The ADRs were listed per paediatric subspecialty, to evaluate any differences in documentation and reporting of the ADRs. Subsequently, the causality, severity, and seriousness of the ADRs were assessed. The ADRs were categorised by system organ class and drug class. The national pharmacovigilance centre was consulted to check if there were any reports coming from our hospital and to collect the total number of reports. Results The medical records of 301 patients were analysed, 81 patients were suffering from one or more ADRs. In total 132 suspected ADRs were found, divided among 19 different paediatric subspecialties. Numbers were too small to investigate the differences in ADR documentation. Of these found ADRs, 55% were not explicitly noted as such in the medical records by the treating physician. None of the ADRs were reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre. Most ADRs scored ‘possible’ in the causality assessment, were mild or moderate, and a small number were serious. The ADRs occurred in 25 different organ systems. In total 25 different drug classes were involved. Conclusions The results of the present study show that a large number of ADRs are not registered in the medical records and are not reported to the national pharmacovigilance system. Furthermore, it is shown that the number of ADRs occurring at our centre is much higher than the number reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre. Only an average of 513 ADRs in paediatric patients are reported per year nationwide, suggesting that there is extensive underreporting.

For drug safety in pediatric patients, knowledge about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is essential to balance benefits and risks, especially because of the high incidence of off-label drug use. However, underreporting of ADRs is a serious problem, leading to a deficit in knowledge affecting clinical practice. The aim of this study is to find a method by which we can improve the quantity of ADR reporting while maintaining or improving the quality of the ADR reports. This was done in several steps. First, health care providers were educated to increase awareness of ADRs. Thereafter, a novel active supporting system was introduced, where reporting ADRs was simplified; if clinical physicians suspected an ADR, they only had to send the name or hospital number of the patient, the observed ADR, and the suspected drug to a supportive team. This team collects all information needed about the possible ADR from the patient’s medical records and hospital charts. With this information, the supportive team fills in the forms necessary for reporting ADRs to the nationwide pharmacovigilance centre Lareb. With this system, the quantity of ADR reports from both inpatients and outpatients rose dramatically. Subsequently, the quality of the obtained ADR reports was measured using the ClinDoc and vigiGrade systems. This study shows there is no loss of quality of the ADR reports in the active reporting system compared to spontaneous reporting systems. Based on the data of the present study, we suggest that an active reporting system has the potential to increase our knowledge about ADRs in pediatric patients.

By definition, children constitute a vulnerable population, especially when they are chronically ill and/or disabled. A characteristic of chronically ill and disabled children is that they also suffer from indirect effects of their disease, such as immobilization, chronic inflammation, reduced time outdoors in the sun, osteotoxic effects of disease-targeted therapy (like glucocorticoids), and poor nutrition. All these factors may lead to bone fragility due to secondary osteoporosis, a co-morbidity that may be overlooked in the context of serious underlying diseases. The ultimate goal of osteoporosis diagnosis and monitoring in this setting is the early identification, prevention, and treatment of low-trauma long bone and vertebral fractures; indeed, vertebral fractures are a frequently under-diagnosed manifestation of overt bone fragility in this context. Efforts to prevent first-ever fractures are also meritorious, including encouragement of weight-bearing activities, optimization of nutritional status, including calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and the diagnosis and treatment of delayed growth and puberty; however, these conservative measures may be insufficient in those at high risk. Numerous natural history studies have shown that vertebral fractures are more common than non-vertebral (i.e., long bone) fractures in at-risk children. Not surprisingly, the cornerstone of secondary osteoporosis monitoring is lateral spine imaging for the early detection of vertebral collapse. Although dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard to measure bone mineral density, digital X-ray radiogrammetry may be used as a surrogate measure of bone strength if dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is not available. In the event that preventive measures fail, treatment with bisphosphonates may be appropriate. Typically, treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates is reserved for children with overt bone fragility and limited potential for spontaneous recovery. However, there is increasing attention to very high-risk children, such as boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, who may benefit from bisphosphonate therapy prior to first-ever fractures (given their high fracture frequency and essentially absent potential for spontaneous recovery). This article provides a contemporary overview of the definition and diagnosis of osteoporosis in children with chronic illness, along with the approach to monitoring those at risk and the evidence for currently recommended intervention strategies.

Background: The current standard therapy for pediatric optic pathway/hypothalamic glioma (OPHG) is systemic anticancer therapy (SAT) over surgery and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, recurrent radiological or clinical tumor progression after SAT forms a considerable challenge. Sporadic OPHGs are considered to have a higher tendency toward progression after first-line systemic anticancer therapy (SAT) compared to neurofibromatosis type-1-associated (NF1) OPHGs. Methods: The objective of this study was to conduct a national retrospective cohort analysis of children who received various treatments for a progressive OPHG, involving the hypothalamus and/or chiasm and/or optic radiations. The study aimed to examine the differences in clinical course and the range of treatment modalities applied to both sporadic and NF1-associated OPHGs between 1995 and 2020. Additionally, we sought to identify risk factors for 3- and 5-year progression following first- and second-order SAT. Results: In total, 136 children received treatment, of whom 49 of 136 (36.0%) had NF1. Within a median of 7.5 years (range: 0.1–23.8 years) of follow-up, sporadic OPHGs received more treatments compared to NF1-associated OPHGs (median of 2 (range: 1–8) vs. median of 1 (range: 1–7) (p < 0.01)). Nine children with sporadic OPHGs (6.6%) died. Of 112 children (82.4%) receiving SAT, 92% received combined first-line vincristine and carboplatin. These children had a 3- and 5-year progression-free survival of 61.8% (95% CI: 51.0–72.6%) and 48.4% (95% CI: 38.0–58.8%), respectively. Sporadic OPHGs had a higher rate of second progression (p < 0.01). Starting first-line vincristine and carboplatin at an age below one year was the only independent risk factor for progression. Conclusions: In this national historic cohort of pediatric OPHGs, four out of five children received SAT. Sporadic OPHGs received a higher number of various SATs compared to NF1-associated OPHGs, but the sporadic appearance of OPHGs was not an independent risk factor for progression after combined vincristine and carboplatin, as ‘age below one year at the start’ was the only factor.

Introduction The use of drugs carries risks, as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can occur. In the Netherlands, a voluntary pharmacovigilance system is in place, allowing healthcare professionals and patients to report (suspected) ADRs. Previous research has highlighted underreporting as a significant problem; however, barriers for ADR reporting are not clear. Objectives The aim was to assess perceptions of ADR reporting among pediatricians (in training), to identify barriers hindering reporting, and to study differences between our hospital and other Dutch hospitals. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among pediatricians (in training) in the Netherlands. The study questionnaire was based on a validated questionnaire and adjusted for the Dutch context, addressing aspects related to ADR reporting, attitudes toward ADRs in work environment, personal vision, reasons for nonreporting, and future perspectives. Results A dataset of 127 respondents was included. Of these, 93% reported knowing how to report an ADR. Overall, 95% believed that reporting ADRs has the potential to enhance knowledge and improve drug safety, and 93% acknowledged the overall importance of ADR reporting. However, 19% of respondents indicated that they had never reported an ADR. The most commonly cited reason (61%) for not reporting was prior knowledge of the ADR. Other barriers included uncertainty about whether a symptom constituted an ADR, the perception that the ADR was not severe, and time constraints. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of addressing barriers to ADR reporting in pediatric healthcare. While healthcare professionals recognize the significance of ADR reporting, several impediments hinder their reporting efforts.