Lee CH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Sep;39:e293. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e293

Bang S, et al. Investig Clin Urol. 2022 May;63(3):301-308. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20210434

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of single-port (SP) robotic transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We sequentially analyzed 30 partial nephrectomy performed after the SP robot was introduced to the hospital in September 2021 to June 2022. All patients were found to have T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCCs) and were operated by a single expert in conventional robot with da Vinci SP platform. Results: Total of 30 patients underwent SP robotic partial nephrectomy with 16 (53.33%) by TP approach and 14 (47.67%) by RP. Body mass index was slightly higher in TP group (25.37 vs 23.53, p -value = 0.040). The other demographic information was not significantly different. There was no statistical difference in ischemic time (727.41 ± 561.18 seconds for TP and 698.56 ± 299.23 seconds for RP, p -value = 0.812), and console time (67.97 ± 24.06 minutes for TP and 69.71 ± 28.66 minutes for RP, p -value = 0.724). There was no statistical difference in perioperative and pathologic outcomes either. Postoperative renal function calculated from diethylenetriaminepentacetate was 103.33 mL/min/1.73 m ² for TP and 101.33 mL/min/1.73 m ² for RP ( p -value = 0.214). And 90.36 mL/min/1.73 m ² for TP and 87.74 mL/min/1.73 m ² for RP at 90 days after surgery ( p -value = 0.592). Conclusion: SP robot partial nephrectomy can be performed effectively and safely regardless of the approach. TP and RP approach offers similar perioperative and postoperative outcomes for T1 RCC. The Clinical Trial Registration number KC22WISI0431.

Objective: To compare the surgical results of retroperitoneal (RP) robot partial nephrectomy (PNx) using either a single-port robot (SP) or a multi-port robot (MP). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all RP robotic PNx performed at a single institution from September 2021—when the SP robot was introduced to the institution—through April 2023. In total, 125 patients underwent the surgery; 81 patients were treated with surgery using a MP robot whereas 44 patients were treated with surgery using a SP. All MP surgeries were performed with da Vinci Xi (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, California, USA), while all SP surgeries were performed with da Vinci SP (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, California, USA). We performed a propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis of these 125 patients. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups after PSM. In terms of operation time, that for MP was 103.68 ± 21.89 minutes whereas that for SP was 95.43 ± 32.22 minutes ( p -value = 0.164). Meanwhile, in terms of console time, that for MP was 70.95 ± 21.92 minutes whereas that for SP was 64.14 ± 32.06 minutes ( p -value = 0.248). In terms of estimated blood loss was 90.91 ± 91.06 mL in MP and 92.27 ± 104.30 mL in SP ( p -value = 0.948). Lastly, there was a statistically significant difference in warm ischemic time, as it was 17.18 ± 6.56 minutes in MP and 13.82 ± 4.59 in SP ( p -value = 0.007). There were no statistically significant differences between MP and SP in any other surgical outcomes. Conclusions: SP robot RP PNx demonstrated comparable outcomes to those achieve using MP procedures. This means SP robot RP PNx can be considered a preferable and more convenient surgical approach than conventional methods, particularly when dealing with small renal masses located in the posterior side of the kidney.

Background: With the introduction of the single-port (SP) robot, surgery that was difficult to attempt is becoming possible. Nephroureterectomy (NUx) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma also seems to be able to attempt a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. Purpose: to investigate the feasibility of SP robotic RP NUx with bladder cuff excision. Design, setting, and participants: we sequentially analyzed 20 patients who underwent SP robot NUx from January 2021 to December 2022. Surgical procedure: all patients were diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and were operated upon by a single expert using the da Vinci SP platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with retroperitoneal approach. Results and limitations: A total of 20 patients underwent SP robotic NUx with bladder cuff excision. The mean age of patients was 69.45 ± 8.68 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.37 ± 3.00 kg/m². The mean tumor size was 2.42 ± 1.03 cm on a CT scan, with right-sided tumors in eight patients (40%) and left-sided tumors in 12 patients (60%). The median console time was 106 min and 40 s, and the expected blood loss was 122.50 ± 75.18 mL. Final pathology showed that all of the patients were diagnosed as having urothelial carcinoma; one patient was classified as Ta (5.00%), three patients were classified as T1 (15.00%), seven patients were classified as T2 (35.00%), eight patients were classified as T3 (40.00%), and one patient was classified as T4 (5.00%). None of these 20 patients showed any complications based on the Clavien–Dindo scale. Conclusions: SP robotic NUx using a retroperitoneal approach provides feasible perioperative and postoperative outcomes for UTUC.

Kwon HJ, et al. Investig Clin Urol. 2024 Jul;65:e51. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20230427