Introduction: Recent studies showed that balanced opioid-free anesthesia is feasible and desirable in several surgical settings. However, in thoracic surgery, scientific evidence is still lacking. Thus, we conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis of opioid-free anesthesia in this field. Methods: The primary outcome was the occurrence of any complication. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, recovery room length of stay, postoperative pain at 24 and 48 h, and morphine equivalent consumption at 48 h. Results: Out of 375 potentially relevant articles, 6 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 5 observational cohort studies) counting a total of 904 patients were included. Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid-based anesthesia, was associated with a lower rate of any complication (74 of 175 [42%] vs. 200 of 294 [68%]; RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65–0.89; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), lower 48 h morphine equivalent consumption (MD −14.5 [−29.17/−0.22]; p = 0.05; I2 = 95%) and lower pain at 48 h (MD −1.95 [−3.6/0.3]; p = 0.02, I = 98%). Conclusions: Opioid-free anesthesia in thoracic surgery is associated with lower postoperative complications, and less opioid demand with better postoperative analgesia at 48 h compared to opioid-based anesthesia.
29 December 2024 in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Purpose of review: This editorial aims to highlight the evolving concept of protective hemodynamics in the management of critically ill patients. Recent findings: Recent literature underscores the limitations of rigid blood pressure targets, particularly in the context of critical care and perioperative management. High blood pressure targets, especially when coupled with high-dose vasopressors, can lead to poor outcomes. ’Protective hemodynamics’ aims to maintain cardiovascular stability while reducing risks associated with interventions. Summary: The implications of adopting protective hemodynamics are profound for both clinical practice and research. Clinically, this approach can reduce iatrogenic harm and improve long-term outcomes for critically ill patients. For research, it opens new avenues for investigating individualized hemodynamic management strategies that prioritize overall patient stability and long-term health over rigid target attainment.
BACKGROUND: Major noncardiac surgery is associated with high rates of postoperative myocardial injury and other complications. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) was reported to decrease these complication rates. However, such supportive evidence lacks robustness. METHODS: In a multinational, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adult high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures to receive RIPC or sham RIPC after the induction of general anesthesia and before surgery. RIPC involved three 5-minute ischemic cycles, each followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion, using a blood pressure cuff inflated to 200 mm Hg. The primary end point was the rate of myocardial injury, defined by an increase in postoperative troponin levels above the highest 99th percentile of reference values. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, need for intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: We recruited 1213 patients in 25 hospitals and 8 countries. We randomly assigned 599 patients to RIPC and 614 to sham RIPC. The most frequent surgical procedures were abdominal or intrathoracic surgeries (406 patients [33.6%]). RIPC was applied to the upper limb in 1014 patients (84.8%) and to the lower limb in 182 patients (15.2%). Postoperative myocardial injury occurred in 215 of 566 patients (38.0%) in the RIPC group and in 223 of 596 patients (37.4%) in the sham RIPC group (relative risk, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.88–1.18; P =0.84). There were no significant differences in the rate of any secondary outcomes. We observed 11 episodes of limb petechiae (10 [1.7%] in the RIPC group versus one [0.2%] in the sham RIPC group) and 34 (6.0%) hospital readmissions in the RIPC group versus 20 (3.5%) in the sham RIPC group. CONCLUSIONS: Among adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, RIPC did not reduce myocardial injury or other postoperative complications. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02427867.
24 February 2026 in British Journal of Anaesthesia