Juan Cai

Dr. Juan Cai


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2021 in Learning Environments Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJuan Cai
Juan Cai
QWQingyun Wen
Qingyun Wen
KLKoen Lombaerts
Koen Lombaerts
IJIrma Jaime
Irma Jaime
LCLi Cai
Li Cai

1 March 2022 in Studies in Educational Evaluation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJuan Cai
Juan Cai
QWQingyun Wen
Qingyun Wen
IJIrma Jaime
Irma Jaime
LCLi Cai
Li Cai
KLKoen Lombaerts
Koen Lombaerts


6 January 2023 in Social Psychology of Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJuan Cai
Juan Cai
QWQingyun Wen
Qingyun Wen
Zhengwen QiZhengwen Qi
Zhengwen Qi
KLKoen Lombaerts
Koen Lombaerts


24 August 2023 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJuan Cai
Juan Cai
FBFree De Backer
Free De Backer
GVGeert Vandermeersche
Geert Vandermeersche
KLKoen Lombaerts
Koen Lombaerts
A comprehensive cross-national understanding of the classroom learning environment (CLE) is critical to advancing CLE’s development. This study compares the English and Chinese CLE literature to enhance a complete understanding of CLE. We conducted bibliometric analysis on 3,130 English literature from Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) and 1,261 Chinese literature from the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI). The results show that both Chinese and English literature focus on the influence of CLE on students’ cognitive and affective learning outcomes and the incorporation of information technology in CLE. The results also reveal the differences between Chinese and English literature from two perspectives: (1) Chinese CLE research mainly focuses on English education, and English CLE research mainly focuses on science education and (2) Chinese CLE research mainly analyzed the pedagogical aspect of CLE, while English CLE research focused on CLE’s social and psychological aspects. We also discussed that future research should focus on (1) the balance of analyzing CLE from the perspective of students and other educational stakeholders such as teachers and school leaders, (2) student differences from the pedagogical level, (3) the physical level of CLE, (4) the use of statistical methods such as structural equation modeling that can analyze the mechanisms underlying the effects of CLE on student learning, and (5) the interdisciplinary research on CLE.