Objectives: A new bone conduction transducer, the Radioear B-81, has been designed to be an improvement over the commonly used transducer, the Radioear B-71. Reference Equivalent Threshold Force Levels (RETFLs) were obtained with the new Radioear B-81. Design: Thresholds were obtained in accordance with ANSI-S3.6-2018 (Annex D) and participants were selected as prescribed in ISO 389.9-2009. Thresholds were obtained with automatic audiometry using circumaural earphones (Radioear DD450) and forehead placement of the bone vibrators. Results: Mean bone conduction thresholds obtained using the B-81 and B-71 bone oscillators for frequencies from 250 to 4000 Hz were not statistically different. RETFLs for the B-81 are identical to the values in ANSI S3.6-2018 for the B-71 bone vibrator. Air-bone gaps were observed for both transducers at low frequencies (250 and 500 Hz) due to occlusion effects produced by the circumaural earphone and at high frequencies (3000 and 4000 Hz), previously reported in several studies that used standard RETFLs. Test-retest differences for air conduction thresholds were analyzed and the results are presented in the Appendix A (Supplemental Digital Content 1, ). Conclusions: RETFLs in ANSI S3.6-2018 and ISO 389.3-2016 are appropriate for use with the B-81 bone vibrator.

This electrophysiological study investigated the role of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents in listening in noise. Both ears of eleven normal-hearing adult participants were tested. The physiological tests consisted of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) inhibition and the measurement of cortical event-related potentials (ERPs). The mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 responses were obtained in passive and active listening tasks, respectively. Behavioral responses for the word recognition in noise test were also analyzed. Consistent with previous findings, the TEOAE data showed significant inhibition in the presence of contralateral acoustic stimulation. However, performance in the word recognition in noise test was comparable for the two conditions (i.e., without contralateral stimulation and with contralateral stimulation). Peak latencies and peak amplitudes of MMN and P300 did not show changes with contralateral stimulation. Behavioral performance was also maintained in the P300 task. Together, the results show that the peripheral auditory efferent effects captured via otoacoustic emission (OAE) inhibition might not necessarily be reflected in measures of central cortical processing and behavioral performance. As the MOC effects may not play a role in all listening situations in adults, the functional significance of the cochlear effects of the medial olivocochlear efferents and the optimal conditions conducive to corresponding effects in behavioral and cortical responses remain to be elucidated.

Individuals with hearing loss are at risk for cognitive decline. The traditional approach to audiological care does not typically involve a team approach that addresses cognitive concerns. While cognitive screening is within the scope of practice in audiology, audiologists are not typically trained in interpreting screening results or providing rehabilitation that supports cognitive health. However, as growing evidence shows that hearing loss is tied to cognitive decline, a team approach is required to support whole-person care. Speech–language pathologists, who specialize in optimizing communication, are best situated to collaborate with audiologists to provide holistic aural rehabilitation. Audiologists and speech–language pathologists who partner to support a client’s communication skills and social relationships play an important role in the life of an individual with hearing loss. In this perspective, we describe relevant background information about hearing loss and cognition and present an interprofessional approach to aural rehabilitation for adults with hearing loss who have cognitive concerns. We also discuss implications for future research.