Daniel Feinstein

Mr. Daniel Feinstein

United States Geological Survey (Retired), Reston, VA, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2003 in Groundwater
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRandall Hunt
Randall Hunt
HHHenk M. Haitjema
Henk M. Haitjema
JKJames T. Krohelski
James T. Krohelski
Daniel FeinsteinDaniel Feinstein
Daniel Feinstein

14 July 2018 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMichael N. Fienen
Michael N. Fienen
BNB. Thomas Nolan
B. Thomas Nolan
LKLeon J. Kauffman
Leon J. Kauffman
Daniel FeinsteinDaniel Feinstein
Daniel Feinstein
Groundwater age is an important indicator of groundwater susceptibility to anthropogenic contamination and a key input to statistical models for forecasting water quality. Numerical models can provide estimates of groundwater age, enabling interpretation of measured age tracers. However, to extend to national‐scale groundwater systems where numerical models are not routinely available, a more efficient metamodeling approach can provide a less precise but widely applicable estimate of groundwater age, trained to make forecasts based on predictor variables that can be measured independent of numerical models. We trained gradient‐boosted regression tree statistical metamodels to MODFLOW/MODPATH‐derived groundwater age estimates in five inset models in the Lake Michigan Basin, USA. Using high‐throughput computing, we explored an exhaustive range of tuning parameters and tested metamodels through cross validation, a 20% holdout, and a round robin approach among the five inset models withholding each inset model from training and testing on the held‐out inset model. Forecast skill—measured by Nash Sutcliffe efficiency—was high for age‐related responses in the 20% hold‐out case (ranging from 0.73 to 0.84). The round robin analysis provided the opportunity to explore extending to unmodeled areas and a greater range of skill indicated the need to evaluate when it is appropriate to apply a metamodel from one region to another. We further explored the ramifications of metamodel simplification achieved through removing predictor variables based on their estimated importance. We found that similar metamodel performance was achievable with a fraction of the candidate set of predictor variables with well construction variables being most important.

27 April 2015 in Groundwater
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MFMichael N. Fienen
Michael N. Fienen
BNBernard T. Nolan
Bernard T. Nolan
Daniel FeinsteinDaniel Feinstein
Daniel Feinstein
JSJ. Jeffrey Starn
J. Jeffrey Starn

12 January 2016 in Groundwater
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Daniel FeinsteinDaniel Feinstein
Daniel Feinstein
MFMichael N. Fienen
Michael N. Fienen
Howard ReevesHoward Reeves
Howard Reeves
CLChristian D. Langevin
Christian D. Langevin

1 July 2004 in Groundwater
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Daniel FeinsteinDaniel Feinstein
Daniel Feinstein
WGWeixing Guo
Weixing Guo

1 March 2003 in Groundwater
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Daniel FeinsteinDaniel Feinstein
Daniel Feinstein
CDCharles Dunning
Charles Dunning
RHRandall Hunt
Randall Hunt
JKJim Krohelski
Jim Krohelski