Multifocal functional tests are not routinely performed in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) management. We emphasise their importance and coin the term functional diabetic retinopathy (FDR). We reviewed current guidelines on management of DR/DME, and literature on diabetic retinal neurodegeneration (DRN) and functional deficits in DR/DME. Functional visual loss due to DRN precedes vasculopathy and clinical DR; however, currently the diagnosis and management of DR/DME are based on classical signs of retinal vasculopathy and structural changes shown by funduscopy, fundus photographs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Furthermore, DME can mask DRN-based retinal layer thinning by OCT and is focussed on the macular region. The only functional test recommended in national and international guidelines on DR/DME is best-corrected visual acuity, a test of foveal function (<1 % of retina). Multifocal functional tests can objectively characterize both foveal and extrafoveal, localized and global, function. Current recommendations for DR/DME screening are inadequate to detect FDR affecting the greater retina. Early detection of FDR using multifocal functional tests could bring DR/DME management strategies forward enabling prevention of the later stage vision-threatening complications. After all, the end point of patient care is functional outcomes.

Background: Knowing the pattern and presentation of the diseases is critical for management strategies. To inform eye-care policy we quantified the pattern of vitreo-retinal (VR) diseases presenting at the national referral hospital in Bhutan. Methods: We reviewed all new patients over three years from the retinal clinic of the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital. Demographic data, presenting complaints and duration, treatment history, associated systemic diseases, diagnostic procedures performed, and final diagnoses were quantified. Comparisons of the expected and observed frequency of gender used Chi-squared tests. We applied a sampling with replacement based bootstrap analysis (10,000 cycles) to estimate the population means and the standard errors of the means and standard error of the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles of the ages of the males and females within 20-year cohorts. We then applied t-tests employing the estimated means and standard errors. The 2913 subjects insured that the bootstrap estimates were statistically conservative. Results: The 2913 new cases were aged 47.2 ± 21.8 years. 1544 (53.0%) were males. Housewives (953, 32.7%) and farmers (648, 22.2%) were the commonest occupations. Poor vision (41.9%), screening for diabetic and hypertensive retinopathy (13.1%), referral (9.7%), sudden vision loss (9.3%), and trauma (8.0%) were the commonest presenting symptoms. Coexistent diabetes and hypertension were the most common associated systemic diseases. Haematological tests (blood sugar, HbA1c and lipid profile, 31.8%), OCT (27.4%), refraction (9.9%), B-scan (8.7%), fundus photography (8.0%) were the most commonly performed diagnostic tests. Hypertensive retinopathy (18.9%) was the commonest VR disease, followed by refractive errors referred for retinal evaluation (16.7%), diabetic retinopathy with macular oedema (15.8%), and AMD (11.0%). Retinal detachment was more prevalent in females (83 vs. 41, p = 0.007). Rare vision-threatening diseases like seasonal hyper-acute pan-uveitis also presented. Conclusions: The developing VR service in Bhutan is challenged by the spectrum of diseases, limited human resources (e.g. one retinal surgeon during the study), and accessibility to tertiary eye-care services, all amidst difficult terrain. Sustained effort and robust coordination among the eye-care professionals, government and non-governmental organisations are critical for optimising VR services, especially as rates of diseases such as diabetes and hypertension grow.

Visual field (VF) testing dates back to fifth century B.C. It plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of retinal and neurological diseases. This review summarizes each of the different VF tests and perimetric methods, including the advantages and disadvantages and adherence to the desired standard diagnostic criteria. The review targets beginners and eye care professionals and includes history and evolution, qualitative and quantitative tests, and subjective and objective perimetric methods. VF testing methods have evolved in terms of technique, precision, user-friendliness, and accuracy. Consequently, some earlier perimetric techniques, often still effective, are not used or have been forgotten. Newer technologies may not always be advantageous because of higher costs, and they may not achieve the desired sensitivity and specificity. VF testing is most often used in glaucoma and neurological diseases, but new objective methods that also measure response latencies are emerging for the management of retinal diseases. Given the varied perimetric methods available, clinicians are advised to select appropriate methods to suit their needs and target disease and to decide on applying simple vs. complex tests or between using subjective and objective methods. Newer, rapid, non-contact, objective methods may provide improved patient satisfaction and allow for the testing of children and the infirm.

Aim: To conduct a rapid assessment of avoidable blindness survey in Bhutan to obtain estimates of blindness, visual impairment, and cataract surgical coverage, outcomes and barriers among persons ≥50 years old. Methods: A total of 82 clusters of 50 people ≥50 years were selected using probability proportionate to size sampling. Eligible participants were selected from households using compact segment sampling, and underwent ophthalmic examination for visual acuity, followed by penlight and direct ophthalmoscopy. Participants with cataract were interviewed regarding surgical outcomes and barriers to surgery. Results: Overall, 4046 of 4100 persons enumerated (98.7%) underwent ophthalmic examination. Adjusting for age and sex, the prevalence of bilaterally blind persons with available correction was 1.5% (95% confidence interval 1.09–1.89). Most blindness (67.1%) and severe visual impairment (74.1%) resulted from cataract, but 22.1% resulted from posterior segment pathology. Cataract surgical coverage for bilaterally blind persons was 72.7%. Almost 90% of patients reported moderate or good satisfaction, despite poor surgical outcomes in 23.6%. Conclusions: The prevalence of blindness in people aged ≥50 years in Bhutan was relatively low when compared with neighboring countries and World Health Organization sub-region estimates. Areas for improvement include community outreach, surgical outcomes, and posterior segment diseases.

Purpose: To compare per-region macular sensitivity and delay from objective perimetry with Matrix perimetry and retinal thickness in mild diabetic macular edema (DMO). Methods: Thirty-three patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) aged 59.2 ± 10.5 years participated in a longitudinal study. Macular thickness, sensitivities and delays from the objectiveFIELD Analyzer (OFA), and Matrix perimeter sensitivities were mapped onto a common spatial layout to compute per-region correlations between structure/function measures. A generalized linear mixed-effects logistic regression model determined which variables contributed to clinical diagnosis of DMO. Results: For OFA, the mean sensitivity differences compared with normal in patients with T2D were negative and the mean delay differences positive, indicating lowered sensitivities and prolonged delays, both increasing with diabetes duration. Shorter diabetes duration could produce either localized peripheral hypersensitivities or shorter delays. Functional change could occur when retinal thickness was stable. Peripheral macular thickness correlated with central and peripheral OFA sensitivity and delay, all P < 0.0012 in DMO and a median of P = 0.001 without DMO; this was not true for Matrix sensitivities. The logistic model determined that peripheral thickness, OFA sensitivity (P = 0.043), and time in the study (P = 0.001) contribute independently to the odds of DMO versus no DMO. Conclusions: Mean sensitivities decreased and mean delays increased with duration of diabetes. Peripheral macular thickness correlated significantly with central and peripheral macular OFA sensitivity and delay. Peripheral macular thickness and functional measures may provide sensitive prognostic data. Translational Relevance: Functional loss can precede structural change in DMO, so including such functional assessment for deciding on treatment may be beneficial.