Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy represents a major breakthrough in cancer treatment, and it has achieved unprecedented success in hematological malignancies, especially in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell malignancies. At present, CD19 and BCMA are the most common targets in CAR-T cell therapy, and numerous novel therapeutic targets are being explored. However, the adverse events related to CAR-T cell therapy might be serious or even life-threatening, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), CAR-T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES), infections, cytopenia, and CRS-related coagulopathy. In addition, due to antigen escape, the limited CAR-T cell persistence, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, a considerable proportion of patients relapse after CAR-T cell therapy. Thus, in this review, we focus on the progress and challenges of CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies, such as attractive therapeutic targets, CAR-T related toxicities, and resistance to CAR-T cell therapy, and provide some practical recommendations.

Over the last decade, the survival outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has been substantially improved with the emergence of novel therapeutic agents, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs), and T cell redirecting bispecific antibodies. However, MM remains an incurable neoplastic plasma cell disorder, and almost all MM patients inevitably relapse due to drug resistance. Encouragingly, B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has achieved impressive success in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM and brought new hopes for R/R MM patients in recent years. Due to antigen escape, the poor persistence of CAR-T cells, and the complicated tumor microenvironment, a significant population of MM patients still experience relapse after anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy. Additionally, the high manufacturing costs and time-consuming manufacturing processes caused by the personalized manufacturing procedures also limit the broad clinical application of CAR-T cell therapy. Therefore, in this review, we discuss current limitations of CAR-T cell therapy in MM, such as the resistance to CAR-T cell therapy and the limited accessibility of CAR-T cell therapy, and summarize some optimization strategies to overcome these challenges, including optimizing CAR structure, such as utilizing dual-targeted/multi-targeted CAR-T cells and armored CAR-T cells, optimizing manufacturing processes, combing CAR-T cell therapy with existing or emerging therapeutic approaches, and performing subsequent anti-myeloma therapy after CAR-T cell therapy as salvage therapy or maintenance/consolidation therapy.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study to compare busulfan plus fludarabine (BuFlu) with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) as the conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Totally 108 AML-CR1 patients undergoing allo-HSCT were randomized into BuCy (busulfan 1.6 mg/kg, q12 hours, -7 ~ -4d; cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg.d, -3 ~ -2d) or BuFlu (busulfan 1.6 mg/kg, q12 hours, -5 ~ -2d; fludarabine 30 mg/m2.d, -6 ~ -2d) group. Hematopoietic engraftment, regimen-related toxicity (RRT), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplant related mortality (TRM), and overall survival were compared between the two groups. All patients achieved hematopoietic reconstitution except for two patients who died of RRT during conditioning. All patients obtained complete donor chimerism by day +30 post-transplantation. The incidence of total and III-IV RRT were 94.4% and 81.5% (P = 0.038), and 16.7% and 0.0% (P = 0.002), respectively, in BuCy and BuFlu group. With a median follow up of 609 (range, 3-2130) days after transplantation, the 5-year cumulative incidence of TRM were 18.8 ± 6.9% and 9.9 ± 6.3% (P = 0.104); the 5-year cumulative incidence of leukemia relapse were 16.5 ± 5.8% and 16.2 ± 5.3% (P = 0.943); the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 67.4 ± 7.6% and 75.3 ± 7.2% (P = 0.315), and 72.3 ± 7.5% and 81.9 ± 7.0% (P = 0.177), respectively in BuCy and BuFlu group. Compared with BuCy, BuFlu as a myeloablative condition regimen was associated with lower toxicities and comparable anti-leukemic activity in AML-CR1 patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is mainly limited by the high incidence of graft failure and GvHD. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to support hematopoiesis in vivo and to display potent immunosuppressive effects to prevent or treat GvHD after HSCT. In a multicenter phase II trial, we developed an approach with co-transplantation of MSCs in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT. Forty-four patients with SAA were included. The conditioning regimen included busulfan, cyclophosphamide and thymoglobulin (ATG). The recipients received cyclosporin A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil and short-term methotrexate for GvHD prophylaxis. Three out of 44 patients, who died early before hematopoietic engraftment, were not assessed. Evaluable patients (97.6%; 40/41) achieved hematopoietic reconstitution and sustained full donor chimerism. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 12 days (range 8–21 days) and for platelet engraftment was 19 days (range 8–154 days). The incidence was 29.3% for grade II–IV acute GvHD and 14.6% for chronic GvHD. The overall survival was 77.3% with a median 12-month (range 0.9–30.8) follow-up for surviving patients. These data suggest that co-transplantation of MSCs could reduce the risk of graft failure and severe GvHD in haplo-HSCT for SAA.

Abnormal endometrial receptivity is a major cause of the failure of embryo transplantation, which may lead to infertility, adverse pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes. While hormonal treatment has dramatically improved the fertility outcomes in women with endometriosis, a substantial unmet need persists in the treatment. In this study, methacrylate gelatin (GelMA) and methacrylate sericin (SerMA) hydrogel with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUMSC) encapsulation was designed for facilitating endometrial regeneration and fertility restoration through in situ injection. The presented GelMA/10%SerMA hydrogel showed appropriate swelling ratio, good mechanical properties, and degradation stability. In vitro cell experiments showed that the prepared hydrogels had excellent biocompatibility and cell encapsulation ability of HUMSC. Further in vivo experiments demonstrated that GelMA/SerMA@HUMSC hydrogel could increase the thickness of endometrium and improve the endometrial interstitial fibrosis. Moreover, regenerated endometrial tissue was more receptive to transfer embryos. Summary, we believed that GelMA/SerMA@HUMSC hydrogel will hold tremendous promise to repair or regenerate damaged endometrium.