Safety validation of automated driving functions is a major challenge that is partly tackled by means of simulation-based testing. The virtual validation approach always entails the modeling of automotive perception sensors and their environment. In the real world, these sensors are exposed to adverse influences by environmental conditions such as rain, fog, snow, etc. Therefore, such influences need to be reflected in the simulation models. In this publication, a novel data set is introduced and analyzed. This data set contains lidar data with synchronized reference measurements of weather conditions from a stationary long-term experiment. Recorded weather conditions comprise fog, rain, snow, and direct sunlight. The data are analyzed by pairing lidar values, such as the number of detections in the atmosphere, with weather parameters such as rain rate in mm/h. This results in expectation values, which can directly be utilized for stochastic modeling or model calibration and validation. The results show vast differences in the number of atmospheric detections, range distribution, and attenuation between the different sensors of the data set.

Radar sensors were among the first perceptual sensors used for automated driving. Although several other technologies such as lidar, camera, and ultrasonic sensors are available, radar sensors have maintained and will continue to maintain their importance due to their reliability in adverse weather conditions. Virtual methods are being developed for verification and validation of automated driving functions to reduce the time and cost of testing. Due to the complexity of modelling high-frequency wave propagation and signal processing and perception algorithms, sensor models that seek a high degree of accuracy are challenging to simulate. Therefore, a variety of different modelling approaches have been presented in the last two decades. This paper comprehensively summarises the heterogeneous state of the art in radar sensor modelling. Instead of a technology-oriented classification as introduced in previous review articles, we present a classification of how these models can be used in vehicle development by using the V-model originating from software development. Sensor models are divided into operational, functional, technical, and individual models. The application and usability of these models along the development process are summarised in a comprehensive tabular overview, which is intended to support future research and development at the vehicle level and will be continuously updated.

Validating safety is an unsolved challenge before autonomous driving on public roads is possible. Since only the use of simulation-based test procedures can lead to an economically viable solution for safety validation, computationally efficient simulation models with validated fidelity are demanded. A central part of the overall simulation tool chain is the simulation of the perception components. In this work, a sequential modular approach for simulation of active perception sensor systems is presented on the example of lidar. It enables the required level of fidelity of synthetic object list data for safety validation using beforehand simulated point clouds. The elaborated framework around the sequential modules provides standardized interfaces packaging for co-simulation such as Open Simulation Interface (OSI) and Functional Mockup Interface (FMI), while providing a new level of modularity, testability, interchangeability, and distributability. The fidelity of the sequential approach is demonstrated on an everyday scenario at an intersection that is performed in reality at first and reproduced in simulation afterwards. The synthetic point cloud is generated by a sensor model with high fidelity and processed by a tracking model afterwards, which, therefore, outputs bounding boxes and trajectories that are close to reality.

Reliable traffic lane recognition (TLR) plays a crucial role in automated vehicles (AVs), permitting precise positioning, which is critical for appropriate trajectory planning. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR), because of its proficient depth-estimation capabilities and independence from external lighting, serves as a common tool in TLR. However, the efficacy of LiDAR-based lane detection is notably affected by both road marking’s conditions and varying meteorological conditions. A definitive guideline for improving LiDAR reliability in adverse environmental conditions remains to be established. Within the scope of this study, the feasibility of using structured road markings (RM) reflectorized with glass beads (GB) characterized by refractive index (RI) increased from the typical 1.5 to 1.65 to promote LiDAR reliability was investigated. Visibility of two dissimilar types of RM was assessed across five distinct weather conditions (dry, wet roadway surface, and rainfall intensities of 6, 25, and 100 mm/h) using two LiDARs (128-layer and 16-layer). LiDAR intensity and the number of reflected points were used as indirect indicators for assessing the equipments’ reliability. The findings revealed that the use of structured RM resulted in enhanced LiDAR intensity and reduced intensity attenuation over distance under dry conditions. Comparison of the two LiDARs showed some advantages of using 128-layer sensor, even though principal results remained comparable. This outcome shed light on the possibility of improving LiDAR reliability from the perspective of upgrading road infrastructure.

In automated vehicles, environment perception is performed by various sensor types, such as cameras, radars, lidars, and ultrasonics. Simulation models of these sensors, as required in virtual validation methods, are available in various degrees of detail. However, proving the validity of such models is a subject of research. New metrics and methods for credibility assessment of simulation are needed to standardize the validation process in the future. The so-called double validation metric (DVM) has shown advantages and allows an intuitive interpretability of the validation results. The DVM has so far only been applied to lidar sensor models. In this paper, an extension to the DVM is introduced, which is called the DVM Map. A static measurement scenario is conducted in reality and transferred into simulation. The novel method is demonstrated on the obtained real and simulated radar sensor data. In this simple scenario special focus is put on the position accuracy of GNSS reference sensors. Therefore, their impact on the result of sensor model validation is discussed. The paper shows that the method provides a more detailed and accurate validation in comparison to the state of the art of a radar simulation, revealing previously undetected simulation errors. Errors due to the environment model, signal propagation, and signal processing are separated and satellite imagery is used for intuitive visualization of the results. This method is a complementary tool to existing validation techniques to improve the interpretability and judging the trustworthiness of radar simulations.